![]() |
D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi,
I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any thoughts on this subject or suggestions? Thanks, Paul 97 TJ 4.0L 4 inch lift 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet 33 BFG Short SYE, JB Conversions Pbarton@houston.rr.com |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
What size tires are you running? Do you plan to lock it?
Carl "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while > keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can > tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any > thoughts on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
What size tires are you running? Do you plan to lock it?
Carl "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while > keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can > tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any > thoughts on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
What size tires are you running? Do you plan to lock it?
Carl "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while > keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can > tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any > thoughts on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
What size tires are you running? Do you plan to lock it?
Carl "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while > keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can > tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any > thoughts on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Paul,
The disk brake calipers should be able to hold the axle in as well as a chained up log. If you were Mustang you would need the extra NHRA approved retainers to be able to drag race. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ pbarton wrote: > > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while keeping > the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can tell are > the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any thoughts > on this subject or suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Paul,
The disk brake calipers should be able to hold the axle in as well as a chained up log. If you were Mustang you would need the extra NHRA approved retainers to be able to drag race. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ pbarton wrote: > > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while keeping > the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can tell are > the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any thoughts > on this subject or suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Paul,
The disk brake calipers should be able to hold the axle in as well as a chained up log. If you were Mustang you would need the extra NHRA approved retainers to be able to drag race. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ pbarton wrote: > > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while keeping > the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can tell are > the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any thoughts > on this subject or suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Paul,
The disk brake calipers should be able to hold the axle in as well as a chained up log. If you were Mustang you would need the extra NHRA approved retainers to be able to drag race. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ pbarton wrote: > > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while keeping > the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can tell are > the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any thoughts > on this subject or suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
I did the 8.8 swap 4.56 gears Full Locker No welds on axel tubes Pros: New Axle Disc Brakes (may need new porportioning valve) Cons: emergency brake is much better but seems to stick at times... Full Locker jumps from left to right... POWERTRAXX could not sell my D35 to anyone! ;) Brian Moga Waxhaw.Net On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, pbarton wrote: > Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:33:21 GMT > From: pbarton <pbarton@houston.rr.com> > Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys > Subject: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end > > > > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while keeping > the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can tell are > the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any thoughts > on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
I did the 8.8 swap 4.56 gears Full Locker No welds on axel tubes Pros: New Axle Disc Brakes (may need new porportioning valve) Cons: emergency brake is much better but seems to stick at times... Full Locker jumps from left to right... POWERTRAXX could not sell my D35 to anyone! ;) Brian Moga Waxhaw.Net On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, pbarton wrote: > Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:33:21 GMT > From: pbarton <pbarton@houston.rr.com> > Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys > Subject: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end > > > > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while keeping > the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can tell are > the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any thoughts > on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
I did the 8.8 swap 4.56 gears Full Locker No welds on axel tubes Pros: New Axle Disc Brakes (may need new porportioning valve) Cons: emergency brake is much better but seems to stick at times... Full Locker jumps from left to right... POWERTRAXX could not sell my D35 to anyone! ;) Brian Moga Waxhaw.Net On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, pbarton wrote: > Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:33:21 GMT > From: pbarton <pbarton@houston.rr.com> > Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys > Subject: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end > > > > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while keeping > the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can tell are > the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any thoughts > on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
I did the 8.8 swap 4.56 gears Full Locker No welds on axel tubes Pros: New Axle Disc Brakes (may need new porportioning valve) Cons: emergency brake is much better but seems to stick at times... Full Locker jumps from left to right... POWERTRAXX could not sell my D35 to anyone! ;) Brian Moga Waxhaw.Net On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, pbarton wrote: > Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:33:21 GMT > From: pbarton <pbarton@houston.rr.com> > Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys > Subject: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end > > > > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while keeping > the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can tell are > the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any thoughts > on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Carl,
I am currently running 33"BFG. I doubt if I will ever go bigger than 35". I currently do not have a locker in the TJ. Maybe I will get lucky and find one for the 8.8inch. I think I should be able to get the stock Limited Slip Diff that comes off the Explorer. thanks, paul "Carl" <carlsaiyed@hotmailREMOVE.com> wrote in message news:d9OdnQ0CkdSCzYvZRVn-pw@comcast.com... > What size tires are you running? Do you plan to lock it? > > Carl > > "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> Hi, >> >> I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a >> Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer >> rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while >> keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I >> can tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. >> Any thoughts on this subject or suggestions? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> 97 TJ 4.0L >> >> 4 inch lift >> >> 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet >> >> 33 BFG >> >> Short SYE, JB Conversions >> >> >> >> Pbarton@houston.rr.com >> >> > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Carl,
I am currently running 33"BFG. I doubt if I will ever go bigger than 35". I currently do not have a locker in the TJ. Maybe I will get lucky and find one for the 8.8inch. I think I should be able to get the stock Limited Slip Diff that comes off the Explorer. thanks, paul "Carl" <carlsaiyed@hotmailREMOVE.com> wrote in message news:d9OdnQ0CkdSCzYvZRVn-pw@comcast.com... > What size tires are you running? Do you plan to lock it? > > Carl > > "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> Hi, >> >> I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a >> Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer >> rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while >> keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I >> can tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. >> Any thoughts on this subject or suggestions? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> 97 TJ 4.0L >> >> 4 inch lift >> >> 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet >> >> 33 BFG >> >> Short SYE, JB Conversions >> >> >> >> Pbarton@houston.rr.com >> >> > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Carl,
I am currently running 33"BFG. I doubt if I will ever go bigger than 35". I currently do not have a locker in the TJ. Maybe I will get lucky and find one for the 8.8inch. I think I should be able to get the stock Limited Slip Diff that comes off the Explorer. thanks, paul "Carl" <carlsaiyed@hotmailREMOVE.com> wrote in message news:d9OdnQ0CkdSCzYvZRVn-pw@comcast.com... > What size tires are you running? Do you plan to lock it? > > Carl > > "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> Hi, >> >> I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a >> Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer >> rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while >> keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I >> can tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. >> Any thoughts on this subject or suggestions? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> 97 TJ 4.0L >> >> 4 inch lift >> >> 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet >> >> 33 BFG >> >> Short SYE, JB Conversions >> >> >> >> Pbarton@houston.rr.com >> >> > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Carl,
I am currently running 33"BFG. I doubt if I will ever go bigger than 35". I currently do not have a locker in the TJ. Maybe I will get lucky and find one for the 8.8inch. I think I should be able to get the stock Limited Slip Diff that comes off the Explorer. thanks, paul "Carl" <carlsaiyed@hotmailREMOVE.com> wrote in message news:d9OdnQ0CkdSCzYvZRVn-pw@comcast.com... > What size tires are you running? Do you plan to lock it? > > Carl > > "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> Hi, >> >> I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a >> Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer >> rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while >> keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I >> can tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. >> Any thoughts on this subject or suggestions? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> 97 TJ 4.0L >> >> 4 inch lift >> >> 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet >> >> 33 BFG >> >> Short SYE, JB Conversions >> >> >> >> Pbarton@houston.rr.com >> >> > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi,
Thank you all for your feedback. Looks like I am not going off the deep end by doing this conversion. thanks, paul "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while > keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can > tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any > thoughts on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi,
Thank you all for your feedback. Looks like I am not going off the deep end by doing this conversion. thanks, paul "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while > keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can > tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any > thoughts on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi,
Thank you all for your feedback. Looks like I am not going off the deep end by doing this conversion. thanks, paul "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while > keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can > tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any > thoughts on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi,
Thank you all for your feedback. Looks like I am not going off the deep end by doing this conversion. thanks, paul "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > > I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a > Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer > rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while > keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I can > tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. Any > thoughts on this subject or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > 97 TJ 4.0L > > 4 inch lift > > 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet > > 33 BFG > > Short SYE, JB Conversions > > > > Pbarton@houston.rr.com > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Paul,
Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ pbarton wrote: > > Hi Carl, > I am currently running 33"BFG. I doubt if I will ever go bigger than > 35". I currently do not have a locker in the TJ. Maybe I will get lucky > and find one for the 8.8inch. I think I should be able to get the stock > Limited Slip Diff that comes off the Explorer. > thanks, > paul |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Paul,
Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ pbarton wrote: > > Hi Carl, > I am currently running 33"BFG. I doubt if I will ever go bigger than > 35". I currently do not have a locker in the TJ. Maybe I will get lucky > and find one for the 8.8inch. I think I should be able to get the stock > Limited Slip Diff that comes off the Explorer. > thanks, > paul |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Paul,
Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ pbarton wrote: > > Hi Carl, > I am currently running 33"BFG. I doubt if I will ever go bigger than > 35". I currently do not have a locker in the TJ. Maybe I will get lucky > and find one for the 8.8inch. I think I should be able to get the stock > Limited Slip Diff that comes off the Explorer. > thanks, > paul |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hi Paul,
Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ pbarton wrote: > > Hi Carl, > I am currently running 33"BFG. I doubt if I will ever go bigger than > 35". I currently do not have a locker in the TJ. Maybe I will get lucky > and find one for the 8.8inch. I think I should be able to get the stock > Limited Slip Diff that comes off the Explorer. > thanks, > paul |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
I think you'll be happy. Don't worry about the c-clips.
Carl "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:vtJRf.33555$%X2.2584@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > Thank you all for your feedback. Looks like I am not going off the > deep end by doing this conversion. > thanks, > paul > > > "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> Hi, >> >> I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a >> Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer >> rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while >> keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I >> can tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. >> Any thoughts on this subject or suggestions? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> 97 TJ 4.0L >> >> 4 inch lift >> >> 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet >> >> 33 BFG >> >> Short SYE, JB Conversions >> >> >> >> Pbarton@houston.rr.com >> >> > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
I think you'll be happy. Don't worry about the c-clips.
Carl "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:vtJRf.33555$%X2.2584@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > Thank you all for your feedback. Looks like I am not going off the > deep end by doing this conversion. > thanks, > paul > > > "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> Hi, >> >> I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a >> Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer >> rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while >> keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I >> can tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. >> Any thoughts on this subject or suggestions? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> 97 TJ 4.0L >> >> 4 inch lift >> >> 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet >> >> 33 BFG >> >> Short SYE, JB Conversions >> >> >> >> Pbarton@houston.rr.com >> >> > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
I think you'll be happy. Don't worry about the c-clips.
Carl "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:vtJRf.33555$%X2.2584@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > Thank you all for your feedback. Looks like I am not going off the > deep end by doing this conversion. > thanks, > paul > > > "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> Hi, >> >> I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a >> Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer >> rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while >> keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I >> can tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. >> Any thoughts on this subject or suggestions? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> 97 TJ 4.0L >> >> 4 inch lift >> >> 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet >> >> 33 BFG >> >> Short SYE, JB Conversions >> >> >> >> Pbarton@houston.rr.com >> >> > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
I think you'll be happy. Don't worry about the c-clips.
Carl "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:vtJRf.33555$%X2.2584@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Hi, > Thank you all for your feedback. Looks like I am not going off the > deep end by doing this conversion. > thanks, > paul > > > "pbarton" <pbarton@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:lIrRf.17970$733.6398@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> Hi, >> >> I have decided to upgrade the 97TJ rear end from the D35 to a >> Ford 8.8, with welds on the axel tubes. Will take this from an Explorer >> rear, gives me the pleasure of having disk brakes in the back while >> keeping the same blot pattern, 5x4.5, as the TJ. The weak points as I >> can tell are the 'C clips'. I could use a 'C clip" eliminator if needed. >> Any thoughts on this subject or suggestions? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> 97 TJ 4.0L >> >> 4 inch lift >> >> 3.73 Gears, no lockers yet >> >> 33 BFG >> >> Short SYE, JB Conversions >> >> >> >> Pbarton@houston.rr.com >> >> > > |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. -- jeff L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote: > Hi Paul, > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. -- jeff L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote: > Hi Paul, > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. -- jeff L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote: > Hi Paul, > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. -- jeff L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote: > Hi Paul, > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
The thing that has so far kept me from upgrading running gear and
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw up... Earle "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02... > Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing > the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but > the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I > would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel > shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. > > -- > jeff > > > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and > > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
The thing that has so far kept me from upgrading running gear and
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw up... Earle "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02... > Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing > the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but > the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I > would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel > shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. > > -- > jeff > > > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and > > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
The thing that has so far kept me from upgrading running gear and
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw up... Earle "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02... > Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing > the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but > the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I > would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel > shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. > > -- > jeff > > > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and > > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
The thing that has so far kept me from upgrading running gear and
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw up... Earle "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02... > Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing > the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but > the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I > would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel > shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. > > -- > jeff > > > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and > > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
That's why my nine inch axles are different lengths:
http://www.----------.com/9axles.jpg Ever since my first race car: http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- jeff wrote: > > Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing > the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but > the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I > would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel > shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. > > -- > jeff |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
That's why my nine inch axles are different lengths:
http://www.----------.com/9axles.jpg Ever since my first race car: http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- jeff wrote: > > Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing > the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but > the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I > would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel > shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. > > -- > jeff |
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
That's why my nine inch axles are different lengths:
http://www.----------.com/9axles.jpg Ever since my first race car: http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- jeff wrote: > > Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing > the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but > the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I > would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel > shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet. > > -- > jeff |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands