Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
01-13-2004, 04:20 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
That means you engine is good and strong. I wouldn't worry about the 150
number, I would worry about large variances among them. The tester he used
could be out of calibration enought to read a few psi higher than it should.
The relative difference among adjacent cylinders is more important than the
actual numbers you get.
"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:bu1c4l$c8dq2$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it
diagnosised
> for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi per
> cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
>
> Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the test
> be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
number, I would worry about large variances among them. The tester he used
could be out of calibration enought to read a few psi higher than it should.
The relative difference among adjacent cylinders is more important than the
actual numbers you get.
"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:bu1c4l$c8dq2$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it
diagnosised
> for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi per
> cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
>
> Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the test
> be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
01-13-2004, 04:28 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
"bowgus" <Bowgus@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:64ZMb.12730$%wh.8381@news04.bloor.is.net.cabl e.rogers.com...
> My understanding ,,, water creates steam ,,, which may remove the oil from
> parts like valvestems, rings and so on ,,, which is not good. If it was me
> and I had a carbon problem, I'd first figure out what was causing it, then
> fix it (not that I haven't had a few old beaters that carboned up
> regularly).
>
> And if I had 150 out of 140 ,,, I'd consider myself a lucky guy and go buy
a
> coupla lottery tickets :-)
Me too. I wouldn't give it a second thought. I would spend the time it takes
to pour water or ATF down the intake to get to my favorite wheeling spot.
;-)
01-13-2004, 04:28 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
"bowgus" <Bowgus@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:64ZMb.12730$%wh.8381@news04.bloor.is.net.cabl e.rogers.com...
> My understanding ,,, water creates steam ,,, which may remove the oil from
> parts like valvestems, rings and so on ,,, which is not good. If it was me
> and I had a carbon problem, I'd first figure out what was causing it, then
> fix it (not that I haven't had a few old beaters that carboned up
> regularly).
>
> And if I had 150 out of 140 ,,, I'd consider myself a lucky guy and go buy
a
> coupla lottery tickets :-)
Me too. I wouldn't give it a second thought. I would spend the time it takes
to pour water or ATF down the intake to get to my favorite wheeling spot.
;-)
01-13-2004, 04:28 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
"bowgus" <Bowgus@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:64ZMb.12730$%wh.8381@news04.bloor.is.net.cabl e.rogers.com...
> My understanding ,,, water creates steam ,,, which may remove the oil from
> parts like valvestems, rings and so on ,,, which is not good. If it was me
> and I had a carbon problem, I'd first figure out what was causing it, then
> fix it (not that I haven't had a few old beaters that carboned up
> regularly).
>
> And if I had 150 out of 140 ,,, I'd consider myself a lucky guy and go buy
a
> coupla lottery tickets :-)
Me too. I wouldn't give it a second thought. I would spend the time it takes
to pour water or ATF down the intake to get to my favorite wheeling spot.
;-)
01-13-2004, 04:48 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
Hi Bill,
You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
of smoke should be gone.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it diagnosised
> for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi per
> cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
>
> Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the test
> be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
of smoke should be gone.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it diagnosised
> for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi per
> cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
>
> Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the test
> be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
01-13-2004, 04:48 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
Hi Bill,
You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
of smoke should be gone.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it diagnosised
> for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi per
> cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
>
> Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the test
> be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
of smoke should be gone.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it diagnosised
> for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi per
> cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
>
> Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the test
> be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
01-13-2004, 04:48 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
Hi Bill,
You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
of smoke should be gone.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it diagnosised
> for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi per
> cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
>
> Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the test
> be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
of smoke should be gone.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it diagnosised
> for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi per
> cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
>
> Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the test
> be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
01-13-2004, 06:41 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
Fantastic!!! I'm stoked. I'm making a cross country trip to Florida in
March and was worried about the condition of the engine.
Thanks all,
Bill
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:400467A4.4C5651DD@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
> definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
> of smoke should be gone.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it
diagnosised
> > for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi
per
> > cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> > However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> > between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
> >
> > Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the
test
> > be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really
is?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bill
March and was worried about the condition of the engine.
Thanks all,
Bill
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:400467A4.4C5651DD@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
> definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
> of smoke should be gone.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it
diagnosised
> > for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi
per
> > cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> > However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> > between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
> >
> > Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the
test
> > be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really
is?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bill
01-13-2004, 06:41 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
Fantastic!!! I'm stoked. I'm making a cross country trip to Florida in
March and was worried about the condition of the engine.
Thanks all,
Bill
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:400467A4.4C5651DD@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
> definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
> of smoke should be gone.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it
diagnosised
> > for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi
per
> > cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> > However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> > between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
> >
> > Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the
test
> > be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really
is?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bill
March and was worried about the condition of the engine.
Thanks all,
Bill
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:400467A4.4C5651DD@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
> definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
> of smoke should be gone.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it
diagnosised
> > for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi
per
> > cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> > However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> > between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
> >
> > Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the
test
> > be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really
is?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bill
01-13-2004, 06:41 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cylinder compression 150 per cylinder good?
Fantastic!!! I'm stoked. I'm making a cross country trip to Florida in
March and was worried about the condition of the engine.
Thanks all,
Bill
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:400467A4.4C5651DD@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
> definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
> of smoke should be gone.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it
diagnosised
> > for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi
per
> > cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> > However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> > between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
> >
> > Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the
test
> > be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really
is?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bill
March and was worried about the condition of the engine.
Thanks all,
Bill
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:400467A4.4C5651DD@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> You have a really good battery and starter. ;-) Anyway you
> definitely don't need rings, just replace the stem seals and your puff
> of smoke should be gone.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > I just got a call from the shop where I took my jeep to have it
diagnosised
> > for engine "strength". The guy told me I have compression of 150 psi
per
> > cylinder with no variance between each cylinder. I'm thinking Great.
> > However, I looked up the specs in my FSM where they say I should have
> > between 120 to 140 per cylinder.
> >
> > Can I have too much compression and what would cause that? Could the
test
> > be done incorrectly which would present a higher number than it really
is?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bill