consensus on new commander?
09-26-2006, 10:10 PM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: consensus on new commander?
griffin proclaimed:
>>As for how it drives, dunno. But it left me with the impression I
>>needed to be about 7' tall, 300lb, cigar smoking, steroid driven
>>governor to feel like I fit in it.
>
>
> *plays the Simpson's "Canyonero!" theme song*
I see it more as the family vehicle on "American Dad"
>>As for how it drives, dunno. But it left me with the impression I
>>needed to be about 7' tall, 300lb, cigar smoking, steroid driven
>>governor to feel like I fit in it.
>
>
> *plays the Simpson's "Canyonero!" theme song*
I see it more as the family vehicle on "American Dad"
09-26-2006, 10:41 PM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: consensus on new commander?
XS11E proclaimed:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:45195B26.D4CC53C7@sympatico.ca:
>
>
>> At least it is more or less on topic unlike most of the --------
>> posted here these days.
>
>
> What, you got something against spiders? Frogs? Navy Ships? I suppose
> you thing we should talk about Jeeps?
>
> As for the Commander, I haven't even looked at one yet and probably
> won't even bother, my 1993 GC Ltd. will probably do me forever, but I
> have seen a fair number running around the streets of Phoenix so I
> think it's selling fairly well for whatever that's worth.
I see way more of the new Grands than Commanders. The Commanders at the
local dealer are also offering bigger discounts. One cow orker drove
the Commander for one of those extended weekend road tests and ended up
buying the Grand Cherokee instead because he fit better--and is build
like a linebacker.
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:45195B26.D4CC53C7@sympatico.ca:
>
>
>> At least it is more or less on topic unlike most of the --------
>> posted here these days.
>
>
> What, you got something against spiders? Frogs? Navy Ships? I suppose
> you thing we should talk about Jeeps?
>
> As for the Commander, I haven't even looked at one yet and probably
> won't even bother, my 1993 GC Ltd. will probably do me forever, but I
> have seen a fair number running around the streets of Phoenix so I
> think it's selling fairly well for whatever that's worth.
I see way more of the new Grands than Commanders. The Commanders at the
local dealer are also offering bigger discounts. One cow orker drove
the Commander for one of those extended weekend road tests and ended up
buying the Grand Cherokee instead because he fit better--and is build
like a linebacker.
09-26-2006, 10:41 PM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: consensus on new commander?
XS11E proclaimed:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:45195B26.D4CC53C7@sympatico.ca:
>
>
>> At least it is more or less on topic unlike most of the --------
>> posted here these days.
>
>
> What, you got something against spiders? Frogs? Navy Ships? I suppose
> you thing we should talk about Jeeps?
>
> As for the Commander, I haven't even looked at one yet and probably
> won't even bother, my 1993 GC Ltd. will probably do me forever, but I
> have seen a fair number running around the streets of Phoenix so I
> think it's selling fairly well for whatever that's worth.
I see way more of the new Grands than Commanders. The Commanders at the
local dealer are also offering bigger discounts. One cow orker drove
the Commander for one of those extended weekend road tests and ended up
buying the Grand Cherokee instead because he fit better--and is build
like a linebacker.
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:45195B26.D4CC53C7@sympatico.ca:
>
>
>> At least it is more or less on topic unlike most of the --------
>> posted here these days.
>
>
> What, you got something against spiders? Frogs? Navy Ships? I suppose
> you thing we should talk about Jeeps?
>
> As for the Commander, I haven't even looked at one yet and probably
> won't even bother, my 1993 GC Ltd. will probably do me forever, but I
> have seen a fair number running around the streets of Phoenix so I
> think it's selling fairly well for whatever that's worth.
I see way more of the new Grands than Commanders. The Commanders at the
local dealer are also offering bigger discounts. One cow orker drove
the Commander for one of those extended weekend road tests and ended up
buying the Grand Cherokee instead because he fit better--and is build
like a linebacker.
09-26-2006, 10:41 PM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: consensus on new commander?
XS11E proclaimed:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:45195B26.D4CC53C7@sympatico.ca:
>
>
>> At least it is more or less on topic unlike most of the --------
>> posted here these days.
>
>
> What, you got something against spiders? Frogs? Navy Ships? I suppose
> you thing we should talk about Jeeps?
>
> As for the Commander, I haven't even looked at one yet and probably
> won't even bother, my 1993 GC Ltd. will probably do me forever, but I
> have seen a fair number running around the streets of Phoenix so I
> think it's selling fairly well for whatever that's worth.
I see way more of the new Grands than Commanders. The Commanders at the
local dealer are also offering bigger discounts. One cow orker drove
the Commander for one of those extended weekend road tests and ended up
buying the Grand Cherokee instead because he fit better--and is build
like a linebacker.
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:45195B26.D4CC53C7@sympatico.ca:
>
>
>> At least it is more or less on topic unlike most of the --------
>> posted here these days.
>
>
> What, you got something against spiders? Frogs? Navy Ships? I suppose
> you thing we should talk about Jeeps?
>
> As for the Commander, I haven't even looked at one yet and probably
> won't even bother, my 1993 GC Ltd. will probably do me forever, but I
> have seen a fair number running around the streets of Phoenix so I
> think it's selling fairly well for whatever that's worth.
I see way more of the new Grands than Commanders. The Commanders at the
local dealer are also offering bigger discounts. One cow orker drove
the Commander for one of those extended weekend road tests and ended up
buying the Grand Cherokee instead because he fit better--and is build
like a linebacker.
09-27-2006, 12:13 AM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: consensus on new commander?
griffin wrote:
>>As for how it drives, dunno. But it left me with the impression I
>>needed to be about 7' tall, 300lb, cigar smoking, steroid driven
>>governor to feel like I fit in it.
>
>
> *plays the Simpson's "Canyonero!" theme song*
>
>
Yes, but can you get the La Fem version? <G>
Jeff DeWitt
>>As for how it drives, dunno. But it left me with the impression I
>>needed to be about 7' tall, 300lb, cigar smoking, steroid driven
>>governor to feel like I fit in it.
>
>
> *plays the Simpson's "Canyonero!" theme song*
>
>
Yes, but can you get the La Fem version? <G>
Jeff DeWitt
09-27-2006, 12:13 AM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: consensus on new commander?
griffin wrote:
>>As for how it drives, dunno. But it left me with the impression I
>>needed to be about 7' tall, 300lb, cigar smoking, steroid driven
>>governor to feel like I fit in it.
>
>
> *plays the Simpson's "Canyonero!" theme song*
>
>
Yes, but can you get the La Fem version? <G>
Jeff DeWitt
>>As for how it drives, dunno. But it left me with the impression I
>>needed to be about 7' tall, 300lb, cigar smoking, steroid driven
>>governor to feel like I fit in it.
>
>
> *plays the Simpson's "Canyonero!" theme song*
>
>
Yes, but can you get the La Fem version? <G>
Jeff DeWitt
09-27-2006, 12:13 AM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: consensus on new commander?
griffin wrote:
>>As for how it drives, dunno. But it left me with the impression I
>>needed to be about 7' tall, 300lb, cigar smoking, steroid driven
>>governor to feel like I fit in it.
>
>
> *plays the Simpson's "Canyonero!" theme song*
>
>
Yes, but can you get the La Fem version? <G>
Jeff DeWitt
>>As for how it drives, dunno. But it left me with the impression I
>>needed to be about 7' tall, 300lb, cigar smoking, steroid driven
>>governor to feel like I fit in it.
>
>
> *plays the Simpson's "Canyonero!" theme song*
>
>
Yes, but can you get the La Fem version? <G>
Jeff DeWitt