Carter BBD - End of story for now
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Carter BBD - End of story for now
Wow, you are 'allowed' 329 ppm HC tops and I am 'allowed' 300 ppm. You
also are 'allowed' 3.83% CO ! I am 'allowed' 1.5%.
I have the highest 'allowed' readings in my 86 CJ7.
You are running pretty clean though and could still pass 'our' test with
your readings. LOL!
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> I'm with ya, on eliminating the computer, mostly because it
> eliminates that growth on the side of the Carter BBD, that's always been
> problematic, and probably stopped working correctly fifteen years ago.
> Kalifornia may give me a break on the size of my engine, as
> compared yours: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Got news for ya.
> >
> > I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
> > lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
> > higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
> >
> > And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
> > strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
> > try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
> >
> > The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
> > computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
> > to raise and lower NOx.
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
also are 'allowed' 3.83% CO ! I am 'allowed' 1.5%.
I have the highest 'allowed' readings in my 86 CJ7.
You are running pretty clean though and could still pass 'our' test with
your readings. LOL!
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> I'm with ya, on eliminating the computer, mostly because it
> eliminates that growth on the side of the Carter BBD, that's always been
> problematic, and probably stopped working correctly fifteen years ago.
> Kalifornia may give me a break on the size of my engine, as
> compared yours: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Got news for ya.
> >
> > I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
> > lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
> > higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
> >
> > And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
> > strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
> > try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
> >
> > The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
> > computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
> > to raise and lower NOx.
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Carter BBD - End of story for now
Wow, you are 'allowed' 329 ppm HC tops and I am 'allowed' 300 ppm. You
also are 'allowed' 3.83% CO ! I am 'allowed' 1.5%.
I have the highest 'allowed' readings in my 86 CJ7.
You are running pretty clean though and could still pass 'our' test with
your readings. LOL!
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> I'm with ya, on eliminating the computer, mostly because it
> eliminates that growth on the side of the Carter BBD, that's always been
> problematic, and probably stopped working correctly fifteen years ago.
> Kalifornia may give me a break on the size of my engine, as
> compared yours: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Got news for ya.
> >
> > I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
> > lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
> > higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
> >
> > And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
> > strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
> > try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
> >
> > The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
> > computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
> > to raise and lower NOx.
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
also are 'allowed' 3.83% CO ! I am 'allowed' 1.5%.
I have the highest 'allowed' readings in my 86 CJ7.
You are running pretty clean though and could still pass 'our' test with
your readings. LOL!
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> I'm with ya, on eliminating the computer, mostly because it
> eliminates that growth on the side of the Carter BBD, that's always been
> problematic, and probably stopped working correctly fifteen years ago.
> Kalifornia may give me a break on the size of my engine, as
> compared yours: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Got news for ya.
> >
> > I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
> > lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
> > higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
> >
> > And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
> > strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
> > try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
> >
> > The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
> > computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
> > to raise and lower NOx.
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Carter BBD - End of story for now
In message <41407A5C.69E2926C@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
><snip>
>>
>> 'If?'
>>
>> 'If' you had a cat, and 'if' your test was in California, you'd fail miserably,
>> as would your pals.
>>
>> I prefer to avoid 'if' and stick to facts. The nutter hack will raise NOx
>> emissions.
>>
>
>Got news for ya.
>
>I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
>lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
>higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
You can't compare apples and oranges. Comparing cutpoints for your vehicle
against cutpoints for a vehicle 8-10 years older won't fly.
I showed you months ago how much higher the cutpoints where you are for NOx are
WAY higher than they are here for the same vehicle.
>
>And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
>strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
>try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
Well, they guys who have their Jeeps hacked and then fail their smog test have
to get them fixed somewhere! Hook the computer back up, and set it to specs,
and it passes easily.
>
>The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
>computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
>to raise and lower NOx.
LOL, that's getting pretty weak.
Fact: Vehicle was hacked. It failed. NOx high.
Fact: Vehicle was 'unhacked'. It passed.
Pretty clear to me. You getting confused again?
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>bllsht wrote:
>>
><snip>
>>
>> 'If?'
>>
>> 'If' you had a cat, and 'if' your test was in California, you'd fail miserably,
>> as would your pals.
>>
>> I prefer to avoid 'if' and stick to facts. The nutter hack will raise NOx
>> emissions.
>>
>
>Got news for ya.
>
>I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
>lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
>higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
You can't compare apples and oranges. Comparing cutpoints for your vehicle
against cutpoints for a vehicle 8-10 years older won't fly.
I showed you months ago how much higher the cutpoints where you are for NOx are
WAY higher than they are here for the same vehicle.
>
>And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
>strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
>try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
Well, they guys who have their Jeeps hacked and then fail their smog test have
to get them fixed somewhere! Hook the computer back up, and set it to specs,
and it passes easily.
>
>The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
>computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
>to raise and lower NOx.
LOL, that's getting pretty weak.
Fact: Vehicle was hacked. It failed. NOx high.
Fact: Vehicle was 'unhacked'. It passed.
Pretty clear to me. You getting confused again?
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Carter BBD - End of story for now
In message <41407A5C.69E2926C@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
><snip>
>>
>> 'If?'
>>
>> 'If' you had a cat, and 'if' your test was in California, you'd fail miserably,
>> as would your pals.
>>
>> I prefer to avoid 'if' and stick to facts. The nutter hack will raise NOx
>> emissions.
>>
>
>Got news for ya.
>
>I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
>lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
>higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
You can't compare apples and oranges. Comparing cutpoints for your vehicle
against cutpoints for a vehicle 8-10 years older won't fly.
I showed you months ago how much higher the cutpoints where you are for NOx are
WAY higher than they are here for the same vehicle.
>
>And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
>strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
>try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
Well, they guys who have their Jeeps hacked and then fail their smog test have
to get them fixed somewhere! Hook the computer back up, and set it to specs,
and it passes easily.
>
>The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
>computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
>to raise and lower NOx.
LOL, that's getting pretty weak.
Fact: Vehicle was hacked. It failed. NOx high.
Fact: Vehicle was 'unhacked'. It passed.
Pretty clear to me. You getting confused again?
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>bllsht wrote:
>>
><snip>
>>
>> 'If?'
>>
>> 'If' you had a cat, and 'if' your test was in California, you'd fail miserably,
>> as would your pals.
>>
>> I prefer to avoid 'if' and stick to facts. The nutter hack will raise NOx
>> emissions.
>>
>
>Got news for ya.
>
>I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
>lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
>higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
You can't compare apples and oranges. Comparing cutpoints for your vehicle
against cutpoints for a vehicle 8-10 years older won't fly.
I showed you months ago how much higher the cutpoints where you are for NOx are
WAY higher than they are here for the same vehicle.
>
>And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
>strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
>try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
Well, they guys who have their Jeeps hacked and then fail their smog test have
to get them fixed somewhere! Hook the computer back up, and set it to specs,
and it passes easily.
>
>The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
>computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
>to raise and lower NOx.
LOL, that's getting pretty weak.
Fact: Vehicle was hacked. It failed. NOx high.
Fact: Vehicle was 'unhacked'. It passed.
Pretty clear to me. You getting confused again?
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Carter BBD - End of story for now
In message <41407A5C.69E2926C@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
><snip>
>>
>> 'If?'
>>
>> 'If' you had a cat, and 'if' your test was in California, you'd fail miserably,
>> as would your pals.
>>
>> I prefer to avoid 'if' and stick to facts. The nutter hack will raise NOx
>> emissions.
>>
>
>Got news for ya.
>
>I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
>lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
>higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
You can't compare apples and oranges. Comparing cutpoints for your vehicle
against cutpoints for a vehicle 8-10 years older won't fly.
I showed you months ago how much higher the cutpoints where you are for NOx are
WAY higher than they are here for the same vehicle.
>
>And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
>strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
>try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
Well, they guys who have their Jeeps hacked and then fail their smog test have
to get them fixed somewhere! Hook the computer back up, and set it to specs,
and it passes easily.
>
>The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
>computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
>to raise and lower NOx.
LOL, that's getting pretty weak.
Fact: Vehicle was hacked. It failed. NOx high.
Fact: Vehicle was 'unhacked'. It passed.
Pretty clear to me. You getting confused again?
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>bllsht wrote:
>>
><snip>
>>
>> 'If?'
>>
>> 'If' you had a cat, and 'if' your test was in California, you'd fail miserably,
>> as would your pals.
>>
>> I prefer to avoid 'if' and stick to facts. The nutter hack will raise NOx
>> emissions.
>>
>
>Got news for ya.
>
>I have compared emissions papers with folks from California and we have
>lower top end readings allowed up here. They are allowed to have way
>higher readings and still pass with older vehicles.
You can't compare apples and oranges. Comparing cutpoints for your vehicle
against cutpoints for a vehicle 8-10 years older won't fly.
I showed you months ago how much higher the cutpoints where you are for NOx are
WAY higher than they are here for the same vehicle.
>
>And just 'how' do you 'know' the Nutter will raise NOx? Talking
>strictly 'facts' here. I mean I am 'sure' you $tealer techs would never
>try something like that, so how do you know this 'fact'.
Well, they guys who have their Jeeps hacked and then fail their smog test have
to get them fixed somewhere! Hook the computer back up, and set it to specs,
and it passes easily.
>
>The 'fact' that you tuned something to lower the readings or added a
>computer back in means nothing. I too can play around with the settings
>to raise and lower NOx.
LOL, that's getting pretty weak.
Fact: Vehicle was hacked. It failed. NOx high.
Fact: Vehicle was 'unhacked'. It passed.
Pretty clear to me. You getting confused again?
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Carter BBD - End of story for now
Girlie boy, you don't bullsh*t, let's see a picture of your smog
license or certificate.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
><snip bullsh*t>
license or certificate.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
><snip bullsh*t>
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Carter BBD - End of story for now
Girlie boy, you don't bullsh*t, let's see a picture of your smog
license or certificate.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
><snip bullsh*t>
license or certificate.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
><snip bullsh*t>
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Carter BBD - End of story for now
Girlie boy, you don't bullsh*t, let's see a picture of your smog
license or certificate.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
><snip bullsh*t>
license or certificate.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
><snip bullsh*t>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)