CAN protocol?
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
'94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
by 2008. Here's a list:
http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
II and CAN compatable.
I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
down in the driver's seat and drive around.
Coasty wrote:
> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
> Coasty
>
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>
>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding heart
>>liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would only be an
>>American standard.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Abby Normal wrote:
>>
>>>My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that reads "Made
>>>in
>>>Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a OBDII
>>>scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want to buy the
>>>wrong
>>>one.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>
>
>
'94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
by 2008. Here's a list:
http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
II and CAN compatable.
I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
down in the driver's seat and drive around.
Coasty wrote:
> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
> Coasty
>
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>
>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding heart
>>liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would only be an
>>American standard.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Abby Normal wrote:
>>
>>>My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that reads "Made
>>>in
>>>Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a OBDII
>>>scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want to buy the
>>>wrong
>>>one.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>
>
>
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
'94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
by 2008. Here's a list:
http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
II and CAN compatable.
I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
down in the driver's seat and drive around.
Coasty wrote:
> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
> Coasty
>
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>
>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding heart
>>liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would only be an
>>American standard.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Abby Normal wrote:
>>
>>>My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that reads "Made
>>>in
>>>Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a OBDII
>>>scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want to buy the
>>>wrong
>>>one.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>
>
>
'94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
by 2008. Here's a list:
http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
II and CAN compatable.
I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
down in the driver's seat and drive around.
Coasty wrote:
> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
> Coasty
>
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>
>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding heart
>>liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would only be an
>>American standard.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Abby Normal wrote:
>>
>>>My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that reads "Made
>>>in
>>>Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a OBDII
>>>scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want to buy the
>>>wrong
>>>one.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>
>
>
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
'94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
by 2008. Here's a list:
http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
II and CAN compatable.
I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
down in the driver's seat and drive around.
Coasty wrote:
> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
> Coasty
>
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>
>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding heart
>>liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would only be an
>>American standard.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Abby Normal wrote:
>>
>>>My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that reads "Made
>>>in
>>>Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a OBDII
>>>scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want to buy the
>>>wrong
>>>one.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>
>
>
'94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
by 2008. Here's a list:
http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
II and CAN compatable.
I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
down in the driver's seat and drive around.
Coasty wrote:
> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
> Coasty
>
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>
>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding heart
>>liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would only be an
>>American standard.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Abby Normal wrote:
>>
>>>My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that reads "Made
>>>in
>>>Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a OBDII
>>>scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want to buy the
>>>wrong
>>>one.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>
>
>
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Thanks....
RoyJ wrote:
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased
> in by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both
> OBD II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that
> is really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time,
> sit in down in the driver's seat and drive around.
>
>
> Coasty wrote:
>> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
>> Coasty
>>
>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>>
>>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>> On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding
>>> heart liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would
>>> only be an American standard.
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> Abby Normal wrote:
>>>
>>>> My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that
>>>> reads "Made in
>>>> Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a
>>>> OBDII scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want
>>>> to buy the wrong
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
RoyJ wrote:
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased
> in by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both
> OBD II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that
> is really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time,
> sit in down in the driver's seat and drive around.
>
>
> Coasty wrote:
>> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
>> Coasty
>>
>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>>
>>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>> On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding
>>> heart liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would
>>> only be an American standard.
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> Abby Normal wrote:
>>>
>>>> My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that
>>>> reads "Made in
>>>> Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a
>>>> OBDII scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want
>>>> to buy the wrong
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Thanks....
RoyJ wrote:
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased
> in by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both
> OBD II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that
> is really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time,
> sit in down in the driver's seat and drive around.
>
>
> Coasty wrote:
>> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
>> Coasty
>>
>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>>
>>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>> On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding
>>> heart liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would
>>> only be an American standard.
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> Abby Normal wrote:
>>>
>>>> My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that
>>>> reads "Made in
>>>> Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a
>>>> OBDII scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want
>>>> to buy the wrong
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
RoyJ wrote:
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased
> in by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both
> OBD II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that
> is really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time,
> sit in down in the driver's seat and drive around.
>
>
> Coasty wrote:
>> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
>> Coasty
>>
>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>>
>>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>> On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding
>>> heart liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would
>>> only be an American standard.
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> Abby Normal wrote:
>>>
>>>> My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that
>>>> reads "Made in
>>>> Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a
>>>> OBDII scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want
>>>> to buy the wrong
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Thanks....
RoyJ wrote:
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased
> in by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both
> OBD II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that
> is really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time,
> sit in down in the driver's seat and drive around.
>
>
> Coasty wrote:
>> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
>> Coasty
>>
>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>>
>>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>> On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding
>>> heart liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would
>>> only be an American standard.
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> Abby Normal wrote:
>>>
>>>> My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that
>>>> reads "Made in
>>>> Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a
>>>> OBDII scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want
>>>> to buy the wrong
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
RoyJ wrote:
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased
> in by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both
> OBD II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that
> is really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time,
> sit in down in the driver's seat and drive around.
>
>
> Coasty wrote:
>> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
>> Coasty
>>
>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>>
>>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>> On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding
>>> heart liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would
>>> only be an American standard.
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> Abby Normal wrote:
>>>
>>>> My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that
>>>> reads "Made in
>>>> Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a
>>>> OBDII scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want
>>>> to buy the wrong
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Thanks....
RoyJ wrote:
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased
> in by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both
> OBD II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that
> is really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time,
> sit in down in the driver's seat and drive around.
>
>
> Coasty wrote:
>> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
>> Coasty
>>
>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>>
>>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>> On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding
>>> heart liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would
>>> only be an American standard.
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> Abby Normal wrote:
>>>
>>>> My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that
>>>> reads "Made in
>>>> Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a
>>>> OBDII scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want
>>>> to buy the wrong
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
RoyJ wrote:
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased
> in by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both
> OBD II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that
> is really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time,
> sit in down in the driver's seat and drive around.
>
>
> Coasty wrote:
>> A scanner is a scanner is a scanner
>> Coasty
>>
>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:44ED3E66.56B12882@***.net...
>>
>>> I can't believe the Environmental Protection Agency that requires
>>> On-Board Diagnostics II being anything other than an a Bleeding
>>> heart liberal wacko greenie limp's screw up: therefore there would
>>> only be an American standard.
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>> Abby Normal wrote:
>>>
>>>> My '97 ZJ (grand cherokee) has a stamp in the engine bay that
>>>> reads "Made in
>>>> Cananda". Does this mean that it has a CAN protocol regarding a
>>>> OBDII scanner? I'm looking to purchase a scanner, and don't want
>>>> to buy the wrong
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Thanks, I assumed CAN meant Canadian.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
RoyJ wrote:
>
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
> by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
> II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
> really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
> down in the driver's seat and drive around.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
RoyJ wrote:
>
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
> by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
> II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
> really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
> down in the driver's seat and drive around.
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Thanks, I assumed CAN meant Canadian.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
RoyJ wrote:
>
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
> by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
> II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
> really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
> down in the driver's seat and drive around.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
RoyJ wrote:
>
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
> by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
> II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
> really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
> down in the driver's seat and drive around.
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: CAN protocol?
Thanks, I assumed CAN meant Canadian.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
RoyJ wrote:
>
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
> by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
> II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
> really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
> down in the driver's seat and drive around.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
RoyJ wrote:
>
> Ah.....no. OBD II was on all 1996 and newer vehicles (some had it in
> '94 and '95) CAN protocol started showing up in 2003, must be phased in
> by 2008. Here's a list:
> http://www.auterraweb.com/aboutcan.html
> Only Jeep on the list so far is 2005 and up GC.
>
> Older readers (and many cheap readers) do NOT handle the CAN protocol.
> The really cheap ones like this are OBD II ONLY
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46030
>
> If you want to work on your current equipment, get a plain OBD II
> scanner. If you want to invest for the future, get one that is both OBD
> II and CAN compatable.
>
> I have (ok, I borrow it from a buddy)a laptop PC based scan tool that is
> really nice, you can have several moving graphs at the same time, sit in
> down in the driver's seat and drive around.