California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
06-26-2004, 11:09 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
I don't understand, does the proposed legislation eliminate the smog
exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40DB9C01.2FEBD583@***.net...
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40DB9C01.2FEBD583@***.net...
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
06-27-2004, 12:37 AM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
It will eliminate cars in the future such as my '78 Bronco from
becoming exempt in the year 2008 as they become thirty years old. Like
the argument states thirty year old cars are not used to commute so the
the smog they may produce is very little compared to the back yard
barbecue. Like I keep my car clean anyway:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg , but the repeated tests would be a
financial hardship for me and other retired people that just want to go
the the grocery store.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Steve wrote:
>
> I don't understand, does the proposed legislation eliminate the smog
> exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
becoming exempt in the year 2008 as they become thirty years old. Like
the argument states thirty year old cars are not used to commute so the
the smog they may produce is very little compared to the back yard
barbecue. Like I keep my car clean anyway:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg , but the repeated tests would be a
financial hardship for me and other retired people that just want to go
the the grocery store.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Steve wrote:
>
> I don't understand, does the proposed legislation eliminate the smog
> exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
06-27-2004, 12:37 AM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
It will eliminate cars in the future such as my '78 Bronco from
becoming exempt in the year 2008 as they become thirty years old. Like
the argument states thirty year old cars are not used to commute so the
the smog they may produce is very little compared to the back yard
barbecue. Like I keep my car clean anyway:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg , but the repeated tests would be a
financial hardship for me and other retired people that just want to go
the the grocery store.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Steve wrote:
>
> I don't understand, does the proposed legislation eliminate the smog
> exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
becoming exempt in the year 2008 as they become thirty years old. Like
the argument states thirty year old cars are not used to commute so the
the smog they may produce is very little compared to the back yard
barbecue. Like I keep my car clean anyway:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg , but the repeated tests would be a
financial hardship for me and other retired people that just want to go
the the grocery store.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Steve wrote:
>
> I don't understand, does the proposed legislation eliminate the smog
> exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
06-27-2004, 12:37 AM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
It will eliminate cars in the future such as my '78 Bronco from
becoming exempt in the year 2008 as they become thirty years old. Like
the argument states thirty year old cars are not used to commute so the
the smog they may produce is very little compared to the back yard
barbecue. Like I keep my car clean anyway:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg , but the repeated tests would be a
financial hardship for me and other retired people that just want to go
the the grocery store.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Steve wrote:
>
> I don't understand, does the proposed legislation eliminate the smog
> exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
becoming exempt in the year 2008 as they become thirty years old. Like
the argument states thirty year old cars are not used to commute so the
the smog they may produce is very little compared to the back yard
barbecue. Like I keep my car clean anyway:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg , but the repeated tests would be a
financial hardship for me and other retired people that just want to go
the the grocery store.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Steve wrote:
>
> I don't understand, does the proposed legislation eliminate the smog
> exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
06-27-2004, 12:37 AM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
It will eliminate cars in the future such as my '78 Bronco from
becoming exempt in the year 2008 as they become thirty years old. Like
the argument states thirty year old cars are not used to commute so the
the smog they may produce is very little compared to the back yard
barbecue. Like I keep my car clean anyway:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg , but the repeated tests would be a
financial hardship for me and other retired people that just want to go
the the grocery store.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Steve wrote:
>
> I don't understand, does the proposed legislation eliminate the smog
> exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
becoming exempt in the year 2008 as they become thirty years old. Like
the argument states thirty year old cars are not used to commute so the
the smog they may produce is very little compared to the back yard
barbecue. Like I keep my car clean anyway:
http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg , but the repeated tests would be a
financial hardship for me and other retired people that just want to go
the the grocery store.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Steve wrote:
>
> I don't understand, does the proposed legislation eliminate the smog
> exemption for 30 plus year old cars?
07-02-2004, 12:51 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
From: "McClintock, Tom" <Tom.McClintock@SEN.CA.GOV> 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: Please vote against A.B. 2683.
To: "'----------@***.net'" <----------@***.net>
Thank you for your e-mail and I am in strong agreement that Assembly
Bill 2683 is a bad bill. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Transportation
Committee, I have always opposed all such bills. I voted NO on Assembly
Bill 2683 on June 29th in the Senate Transportation Committee.
Unfortunately, however, the bill passed out of the committee. Be
assured that I will continue to fight against this bill on the Senate
Floor.
Take care,
Tom McClintock
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Subject: RE: Please vote against A.B. 2683.
To: "'----------@***.net'" <----------@***.net>
Thank you for your e-mail and I am in strong agreement that Assembly
Bill 2683 is a bad bill. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Transportation
Committee, I have always opposed all such bills. I voted NO on Assembly
Bill 2683 on June 29th in the Senate Transportation Committee.
Unfortunately, however, the bill passed out of the committee. Be
assured that I will continue to fight against this bill on the Senate
Floor.
Take care,
Tom McClintock
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
07-02-2004, 12:51 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
From: "McClintock, Tom" <Tom.McClintock@SEN.CA.GOV> 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: Please vote against A.B. 2683.
To: "'----------@***.net'" <----------@***.net>
Thank you for your e-mail and I am in strong agreement that Assembly
Bill 2683 is a bad bill. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Transportation
Committee, I have always opposed all such bills. I voted NO on Assembly
Bill 2683 on June 29th in the Senate Transportation Committee.
Unfortunately, however, the bill passed out of the committee. Be
assured that I will continue to fight against this bill on the Senate
Floor.
Take care,
Tom McClintock
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Subject: RE: Please vote against A.B. 2683.
To: "'----------@***.net'" <----------@***.net>
Thank you for your e-mail and I am in strong agreement that Assembly
Bill 2683 is a bad bill. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Transportation
Committee, I have always opposed all such bills. I voted NO on Assembly
Bill 2683 on June 29th in the Senate Transportation Committee.
Unfortunately, however, the bill passed out of the committee. Be
assured that I will continue to fight against this bill on the Senate
Floor.
Take care,
Tom McClintock
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
07-02-2004, 12:51 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
From: "McClintock, Tom" <Tom.McClintock@SEN.CA.GOV> 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: Please vote against A.B. 2683.
To: "'----------@***.net'" <----------@***.net>
Thank you for your e-mail and I am in strong agreement that Assembly
Bill 2683 is a bad bill. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Transportation
Committee, I have always opposed all such bills. I voted NO on Assembly
Bill 2683 on June 29th in the Senate Transportation Committee.
Unfortunately, however, the bill passed out of the committee. Be
assured that I will continue to fight against this bill on the Senate
Floor.
Take care,
Tom McClintock
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Subject: RE: Please vote against A.B. 2683.
To: "'----------@***.net'" <----------@***.net>
Thank you for your e-mail and I am in strong agreement that Assembly
Bill 2683 is a bad bill. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Transportation
Committee, I have always opposed all such bills. I voted NO on Assembly
Bill 2683 on June 29th in the Senate Transportation Committee.
Unfortunately, however, the bill passed out of the committee. Be
assured that I will continue to fight against this bill on the Senate
Floor.
Take care,
Tom McClintock
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
07-02-2004, 12:51 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: California's that want to keep your Jeep over thirty years?
From: "McClintock, Tom" <Tom.McClintock@SEN.CA.GOV> 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: Please vote against A.B. 2683.
To: "'----------@***.net'" <----------@***.net>
Thank you for your e-mail and I am in strong agreement that Assembly
Bill 2683 is a bad bill. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Transportation
Committee, I have always opposed all such bills. I voted NO on Assembly
Bill 2683 on June 29th in the Senate Transportation Committee.
Unfortunately, however, the bill passed out of the committee. Be
assured that I will continue to fight against this bill on the Senate
Floor.
Take care,
Tom McClintock
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Subject: RE: Please vote against A.B. 2683.
To: "'----------@***.net'" <----------@***.net>
Thank you for your e-mail and I am in strong agreement that Assembly
Bill 2683 is a bad bill. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Transportation
Committee, I have always opposed all such bills. I voted NO on Assembly
Bill 2683 on June 29th in the Senate Transportation Committee.
Unfortunately, however, the bill passed out of the committee. Be
assured that I will continue to fight against this bill on the Senate
Floor.
Take care,
Tom McClintock
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=32931
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeepadmin
Jeep News
1
12-12-2011 06:31 PM
L.W. \(Bill\) Hughes III
Jeep Mailing List
8
06-23-2007 10:04 PM
Evangelist_2005@sbcglobal.net
Jeep Mailing List
0
02-11-2005 07:07 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
