boneheads at jeep corporate
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website, which
D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:RqednUxowbsbmmrcRVn-3g@ez2.net...
> He used "jeep" in the URL to his website. DC got a little testy and flexed
> their muscles. I think that today, Nathan could probably fight them and
> win
> because there have been recent rulings that product names in a website are
> not indicators by themselves that consumers can be confused. Basically, DC
> said that consumers will go to Nathan's site and be confused about the
> product offerings.
>
> It was more complicated than that, but this is the reader's digest
> version.
> I think DC was WAY off base in their attacks on Nathan, and many others
> for
> that matter.
>
>
>
>
> "Marc" <none@all.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1c60be254354f497989696@netnews.mchsi.com. ..
>> I'm somewhat new to the group, why was he sued by DC?
>>
>>
>>
>> In article <l4DJd.19259$xu.18295@fed1read05>, jerrypb@***.net says...
>> > Is this the same Nathan W. Collier that swore publically MANY times
>> > that
>> > he would never buy another Jeep after being sued by DC? Doesn't this
>> > make your second Jeep purchased since making that loud and vociferous
>> > pledge? ;)
>> >
>> > Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>> > > first some bonehead down at jeep corporate decides to drop yellow and
> sienna
>> > > from the wranger lineup (if either color were available it would make
> my
>> > > color choice easy. if both were available, id probably flip a coin).
> next,
>> > > some bonehead decides to replace the black top/flares with
> grey...luckily
>> > > that mistake was corrected. in preparing to order my '05 rubicon i
> finally
>> > > decided on another khaki with the black top/interior (just like my
>> > > '03
>> > > http://7slotgrille.com/reviews/performance/doors/6.jpg ) and when i
> went
>> > > down to make the final order, i found out for '05 some corporate
> bonehead
>> > > decided that you cannot get the khaki wrangler with the black
> top/interior.
>> > > you can get a green jeep (rolling off the same assembly line) with a
> black
>> > > top/interior, but you can only get the khaki top/interior on the
>> > > khaki
> jeep.
>> > > i cant help but wonder what the hell these people are thinking in
> making
>> > > stupid decisions like this. it just makes no sense why you can get
> the
>> > > black top/interior on EVERY color rubicon except the khaki. if you
> have
>> > > some insight on why this bonehead decision was made, please share.
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:RqednUxowbsbmmrcRVn-3g@ez2.net...
> He used "jeep" in the URL to his website. DC got a little testy and flexed
> their muscles. I think that today, Nathan could probably fight them and
> win
> because there have been recent rulings that product names in a website are
> not indicators by themselves that consumers can be confused. Basically, DC
> said that consumers will go to Nathan's site and be confused about the
> product offerings.
>
> It was more complicated than that, but this is the reader's digest
> version.
> I think DC was WAY off base in their attacks on Nathan, and many others
> for
> that matter.
>
>
>
>
> "Marc" <none@all.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1c60be254354f497989696@netnews.mchsi.com. ..
>> I'm somewhat new to the group, why was he sued by DC?
>>
>>
>>
>> In article <l4DJd.19259$xu.18295@fed1read05>, jerrypb@***.net says...
>> > Is this the same Nathan W. Collier that swore publically MANY times
>> > that
>> > he would never buy another Jeep after being sued by DC? Doesn't this
>> > make your second Jeep purchased since making that loud and vociferous
>> > pledge? ;)
>> >
>> > Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>> > > first some bonehead down at jeep corporate decides to drop yellow and
> sienna
>> > > from the wranger lineup (if either color were available it would make
> my
>> > > color choice easy. if both were available, id probably flip a coin).
> next,
>> > > some bonehead decides to replace the black top/flares with
> grey...luckily
>> > > that mistake was corrected. in preparing to order my '05 rubicon i
> finally
>> > > decided on another khaki with the black top/interior (just like my
>> > > '03
>> > > http://7slotgrille.com/reviews/performance/doors/6.jpg ) and when i
> went
>> > > down to make the final order, i found out for '05 some corporate
> bonehead
>> > > decided that you cannot get the khaki wrangler with the black
> top/interior.
>> > > you can get a green jeep (rolling off the same assembly line) with a
> black
>> > > top/interior, but you can only get the khaki top/interior on the
>> > > khaki
> jeep.
>> > > i cant help but wonder what the hell these people are thinking in
> making
>> > > stupid decisions like this. it just makes no sense why you can get
> the
>> > > black top/interior on EVERY color rubicon except the khaki. if you
> have
>> > > some insight on why this bonehead decision was made, please share.
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
I miss CJ-5
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website, which
> D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
>
> "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
> news:RqednUxowbsbmmrcRVn-3g@ez2.net...
>
>>He used "jeep" in the URL to his website. DC got a little testy and flexed
>>their muscles. I think that today, Nathan could probably fight them and
>>win
>>because there have been recent rulings that product names in a website are
>>not indicators by themselves that consumers can be confused. Basically, DC
>>said that consumers will go to Nathan's site and be confused about the
>>product offerings.
>>
>>It was more complicated than that, but this is the reader's digest
>>version.
>>I think DC was WAY off base in their attacks on Nathan, and many others
>>for
>>that matter.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Marc" <none@all.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.1c60be254354f497989696@netnews.mchsi.co m...
>>
>>>I'm somewhat new to the group, why was he sued by DC?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>In article <l4DJd.19259$xu.18295@fed1read05>, jerrypb@***.net says...
>>>
>>>>Is this the same Nathan W. Collier that swore publically MANY times
>>>>that
>>>>he would never buy another Jeep after being sued by DC? Doesn't this
>>>>make your second Jeep purchased since making that loud and vociferous
>>>>pledge? ;)
>>>>
>>>>Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>first some bonehead down at jeep corporate decides to drop yellow and
>>
>>sienna
>>
>>>>>from the wranger lineup (if either color were available it would make
>>
>>my
>>
>>>>>color choice easy. if both were available, id probably flip a coin).
>>
>>next,
>>
>>>>>some bonehead decides to replace the black top/flares with
>>
>>grey...luckily
>>
>>>>>that mistake was corrected. in preparing to order my '05 rubicon i
>>
>>finally
>>
>>>>>decided on another khaki with the black top/interior (just like my
>>>>>'03
>>>>>http://7slotgrille.com/reviews/performance/doors/6.jpg ) and when i
>>
>>went
>>
>>>>>down to make the final order, i found out for '05 some corporate
>>
>>bonehead
>>
>>>>>decided that you cannot get the khaki wrangler with the black
>>
>>top/interior.
>>
>>>>>you can get a green jeep (rolling off the same assembly line) with a
>>
>>black
>>
>>>>>top/interior, but you can only get the khaki top/interior on the
>>>>>khaki
>>
>>jeep.
>>
>>>>>i cant help but wonder what the hell these people are thinking in
>>
>>making
>>
>>>>>stupid decisions like this. it just makes no sense why you can get
>>
>>the
>>
>>>>>black top/interior on EVERY color rubicon except the khaki. if you
>>
>>have
>>
>>>>>some insight on why this bonehead decision was made, please share.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website, which
> D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
>
> "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
> news:RqednUxowbsbmmrcRVn-3g@ez2.net...
>
>>He used "jeep" in the URL to his website. DC got a little testy and flexed
>>their muscles. I think that today, Nathan could probably fight them and
>>win
>>because there have been recent rulings that product names in a website are
>>not indicators by themselves that consumers can be confused. Basically, DC
>>said that consumers will go to Nathan's site and be confused about the
>>product offerings.
>>
>>It was more complicated than that, but this is the reader's digest
>>version.
>>I think DC was WAY off base in their attacks on Nathan, and many others
>>for
>>that matter.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Marc" <none@all.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.1c60be254354f497989696@netnews.mchsi.co m...
>>
>>>I'm somewhat new to the group, why was he sued by DC?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>In article <l4DJd.19259$xu.18295@fed1read05>, jerrypb@***.net says...
>>>
>>>>Is this the same Nathan W. Collier that swore publically MANY times
>>>>that
>>>>he would never buy another Jeep after being sued by DC? Doesn't this
>>>>make your second Jeep purchased since making that loud and vociferous
>>>>pledge? ;)
>>>>
>>>>Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>first some bonehead down at jeep corporate decides to drop yellow and
>>
>>sienna
>>
>>>>>from the wranger lineup (if either color were available it would make
>>
>>my
>>
>>>>>color choice easy. if both were available, id probably flip a coin).
>>
>>next,
>>
>>>>>some bonehead decides to replace the black top/flares with
>>
>>grey...luckily
>>
>>>>>that mistake was corrected. in preparing to order my '05 rubicon i
>>
>>finally
>>
>>>>>decided on another khaki with the black top/interior (just like my
>>>>>'03
>>>>>http://7slotgrille.com/reviews/performance/doors/6.jpg ) and when i
>>
>>went
>>
>>>>>down to make the final order, i found out for '05 some corporate
>>
>>bonehead
>>
>>>>>decided that you cannot get the khaki wrangler with the black
>>
>>top/interior.
>>
>>>>>you can get a green jeep (rolling off the same assembly line) with a
>>
>>black
>>
>>>>>top/interior, but you can only get the khaki top/interior on the
>>>>>khaki
>>
>>jeep.
>>
>>>>>i cant help but wonder what the hell these people are thinking in
>>
>>making
>>
>>>>>stupid decisions like this. it just makes no sense why you can get
>>
>>the
>>
>>>>>black top/interior on EVERY color rubicon except the khaki. if you
>>
>>have
>>
>>>>>some insight on why this bonehead decision was made, please share.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
I miss CJ-5
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website, which
> D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
>
> "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
> news:RqednUxowbsbmmrcRVn-3g@ez2.net...
>
>>He used "jeep" in the URL to his website. DC got a little testy and flexed
>>their muscles. I think that today, Nathan could probably fight them and
>>win
>>because there have been recent rulings that product names in a website are
>>not indicators by themselves that consumers can be confused. Basically, DC
>>said that consumers will go to Nathan's site and be confused about the
>>product offerings.
>>
>>It was more complicated than that, but this is the reader's digest
>>version.
>>I think DC was WAY off base in their attacks on Nathan, and many others
>>for
>>that matter.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Marc" <none@all.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.1c60be254354f497989696@netnews.mchsi.co m...
>>
>>>I'm somewhat new to the group, why was he sued by DC?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>In article <l4DJd.19259$xu.18295@fed1read05>, jerrypb@***.net says...
>>>
>>>>Is this the same Nathan W. Collier that swore publically MANY times
>>>>that
>>>>he would never buy another Jeep after being sued by DC? Doesn't this
>>>>make your second Jeep purchased since making that loud and vociferous
>>>>pledge? ;)
>>>>
>>>>Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>first some bonehead down at jeep corporate decides to drop yellow and
>>
>>sienna
>>
>>>>>from the wranger lineup (if either color were available it would make
>>
>>my
>>
>>>>>color choice easy. if both were available, id probably flip a coin).
>>
>>next,
>>
>>>>>some bonehead decides to replace the black top/flares with
>>
>>grey...luckily
>>
>>>>>that mistake was corrected. in preparing to order my '05 rubicon i
>>
>>finally
>>
>>>>>decided on another khaki with the black top/interior (just like my
>>>>>'03
>>>>>http://7slotgrille.com/reviews/performance/doors/6.jpg ) and when i
>>
>>went
>>
>>>>>down to make the final order, i found out for '05 some corporate
>>
>>bonehead
>>
>>>>>decided that you cannot get the khaki wrangler with the black
>>
>>top/interior.
>>
>>>>>you can get a green jeep (rolling off the same assembly line) with a
>>
>>black
>>
>>>>>top/interior, but you can only get the khaki top/interior on the
>>>>>khaki
>>
>>jeep.
>>
>>>>>i cant help but wonder what the hell these people are thinking in
>>
>>making
>>
>>>>>stupid decisions like this. it just makes no sense why you can get
>>
>>the
>>
>>>>>black top/interior on EVERY color rubicon except the khaki. if you
>>
>>have
>>
>>>>>some insight on why this bonehead decision was made, please share.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website, which
> D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
>
> "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
> news:RqednUxowbsbmmrcRVn-3g@ez2.net...
>
>>He used "jeep" in the URL to his website. DC got a little testy and flexed
>>their muscles. I think that today, Nathan could probably fight them and
>>win
>>because there have been recent rulings that product names in a website are
>>not indicators by themselves that consumers can be confused. Basically, DC
>>said that consumers will go to Nathan's site and be confused about the
>>product offerings.
>>
>>It was more complicated than that, but this is the reader's digest
>>version.
>>I think DC was WAY off base in their attacks on Nathan, and many others
>>for
>>that matter.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Marc" <none@all.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.1c60be254354f497989696@netnews.mchsi.co m...
>>
>>>I'm somewhat new to the group, why was he sued by DC?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>In article <l4DJd.19259$xu.18295@fed1read05>, jerrypb@***.net says...
>>>
>>>>Is this the same Nathan W. Collier that swore publically MANY times
>>>>that
>>>>he would never buy another Jeep after being sued by DC? Doesn't this
>>>>make your second Jeep purchased since making that loud and vociferous
>>>>pledge? ;)
>>>>
>>>>Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>first some bonehead down at jeep corporate decides to drop yellow and
>>
>>sienna
>>
>>>>>from the wranger lineup (if either color were available it would make
>>
>>my
>>
>>>>>color choice easy. if both were available, id probably flip a coin).
>>
>>next,
>>
>>>>>some bonehead decides to replace the black top/flares with
>>
>>grey...luckily
>>
>>>>>that mistake was corrected. in preparing to order my '05 rubicon i
>>
>>finally
>>
>>>>>decided on another khaki with the black top/interior (just like my
>>>>>'03
>>>>>http://7slotgrille.com/reviews/performance/doors/6.jpg ) and when i
>>
>>went
>>
>>>>>down to make the final order, i found out for '05 some corporate
>>
>>bonehead
>>
>>>>>decided that you cannot get the khaki wrangler with the black
>>
>>top/interior.
>>
>>>>>you can get a green jeep (rolling off the same assembly line) with a
>>
>>black
>>
>>>>>top/interior, but you can only get the khaki top/interior on the
>>>>>khaki
>>
>>jeep.
>>
>>>>>i cant help but wonder what the hell these people are thinking in
>>
>>making
>>
>>>>>stupid decisions like this. it just makes no sense why you can get
>>
>>the
>>
>>>>>black top/interior on EVERY color rubicon except the khaki. if you
>>
>>have
>>
>>>>>some insight on why this bonehead decision was made, please share.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
I miss CJ-5
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website, which
> D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
>
> "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
> news:RqednUxowbsbmmrcRVn-3g@ez2.net...
>
>>He used "jeep" in the URL to his website. DC got a little testy and flexed
>>their muscles. I think that today, Nathan could probably fight them and
>>win
>>because there have been recent rulings that product names in a website are
>>not indicators by themselves that consumers can be confused. Basically, DC
>>said that consumers will go to Nathan's site and be confused about the
>>product offerings.
>>
>>It was more complicated than that, but this is the reader's digest
>>version.
>>I think DC was WAY off base in their attacks on Nathan, and many others
>>for
>>that matter.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Marc" <none@all.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.1c60be254354f497989696@netnews.mchsi.co m...
>>
>>>I'm somewhat new to the group, why was he sued by DC?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>In article <l4DJd.19259$xu.18295@fed1read05>, jerrypb@***.net says...
>>>
>>>>Is this the same Nathan W. Collier that swore publically MANY times
>>>>that
>>>>he would never buy another Jeep after being sued by DC? Doesn't this
>>>>make your second Jeep purchased since making that loud and vociferous
>>>>pledge? ;)
>>>>
>>>>Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>first some bonehead down at jeep corporate decides to drop yellow and
>>
>>sienna
>>
>>>>>from the wranger lineup (if either color were available it would make
>>
>>my
>>
>>>>>color choice easy. if both were available, id probably flip a coin).
>>
>>next,
>>
>>>>>some bonehead decides to replace the black top/flares with
>>
>>grey...luckily
>>
>>>>>that mistake was corrected. in preparing to order my '05 rubicon i
>>
>>finally
>>
>>>>>decided on another khaki with the black top/interior (just like my
>>>>>'03
>>>>>http://7slotgrille.com/reviews/performance/doors/6.jpg ) and when i
>>
>>went
>>
>>>>>down to make the final order, i found out for '05 some corporate
>>
>>bonehead
>>
>>>>>decided that you cannot get the khaki wrangler with the black
>>
>>top/interior.
>>
>>>>>you can get a green jeep (rolling off the same assembly line) with a
>>
>>black
>>
>>>>>top/interior, but you can only get the khaki top/interior on the
>>>>>khaki
>>
>>jeep.
>>
>>>>>i cant help but wonder what the hell these people are thinking in
>>
>>making
>>
>>>>>stupid decisions like this. it just makes no sense why you can get
>>
>>the
>>
>>>>>black top/interior on EVERY color rubicon except the khaki. if you
>>
>>have
>>
>>>>>some insight on why this bonehead decision was made, please share.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website, which
> D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
>
> "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
> news:RqednUxowbsbmmrcRVn-3g@ez2.net...
>
>>He used "jeep" in the URL to his website. DC got a little testy and flexed
>>their muscles. I think that today, Nathan could probably fight them and
>>win
>>because there have been recent rulings that product names in a website are
>>not indicators by themselves that consumers can be confused. Basically, DC
>>said that consumers will go to Nathan's site and be confused about the
>>product offerings.
>>
>>It was more complicated than that, but this is the reader's digest
>>version.
>>I think DC was WAY off base in their attacks on Nathan, and many others
>>for
>>that matter.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Marc" <none@all.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.1c60be254354f497989696@netnews.mchsi.co m...
>>
>>>I'm somewhat new to the group, why was he sued by DC?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>In article <l4DJd.19259$xu.18295@fed1read05>, jerrypb@***.net says...
>>>
>>>>Is this the same Nathan W. Collier that swore publically MANY times
>>>>that
>>>>he would never buy another Jeep after being sued by DC? Doesn't this
>>>>make your second Jeep purchased since making that loud and vociferous
>>>>pledge? ;)
>>>>
>>>>Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>first some bonehead down at jeep corporate decides to drop yellow and
>>
>>sienna
>>
>>>>>from the wranger lineup (if either color were available it would make
>>
>>my
>>
>>>>>color choice easy. if both were available, id probably flip a coin).
>>
>>next,
>>
>>>>>some bonehead decides to replace the black top/flares with
>>
>>grey...luckily
>>
>>>>>that mistake was corrected. in preparing to order my '05 rubicon i
>>
>>finally
>>
>>>>>decided on another khaki with the black top/interior (just like my
>>>>>'03
>>>>>http://7slotgrille.com/reviews/performance/doors/6.jpg ) and when i
>>
>>went
>>
>>>>>down to make the final order, i found out for '05 some corporate
>>
>>bonehead
>>
>>>>>decided that you cannot get the khaki wrangler with the black
>>
>>top/interior.
>>
>>>>>you can get a green jeep (rolling off the same assembly line) with a
>>
>>black
>>
>>>>>top/interior, but you can only get the khaki top/interior on the
>>>>>khaki
>>
>>jeep.
>>
>>>>>i cant help but wonder what the hell these people are thinking in
>>
>>making
>>
>>>>>stupid decisions like this. it just makes no sense why you can get
>>
>>the
>>
>>>>>black top/interior on EVERY color rubicon except the khaki. if you
>>
>>have
>>
>>>>>some insight on why this bonehead decision was made, please share.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hY6dnS4AyOlPDWrcRVn-qg@comcast.com...
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website,
> which D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
smoke and mirrors matt. at one time i was getting requests from levels of
management above those who filed suit. legally it all boiled down to using
"jeep" in the domain.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:hY6dnS4AyOlPDWrcRVn-qg@comcast.com...
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website,
> which D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
smoke and mirrors matt. at one time i was getting requests from levels of
management above those who filed suit. legally it all boiled down to using
"jeep" in the domain.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hY6dnS4AyOlPDWrcRVn-qg@comcast.com...
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website,
> which D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
smoke and mirrors matt. at one time i was getting requests from levels of
management above those who filed suit. legally it all boiled down to using
"jeep" in the domain.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:hY6dnS4AyOlPDWrcRVn-qg@comcast.com...
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website,
> which D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
smoke and mirrors matt. at one time i was getting requests from levels of
management above those who filed suit. legally it all boiled down to using
"jeep" in the domain.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hY6dnS4AyOlPDWrcRVn-qg@comcast.com...
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website,
> which D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
smoke and mirrors matt. at one time i was getting requests from levels of
management above those who filed suit. legally it all boiled down to using
"jeep" in the domain.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:hY6dnS4AyOlPDWrcRVn-qg@comcast.com...
> You neglected to mention the pictures of nekkid wimmin on his website,
> which D-C, the owner of the trademark "Jeep," objected to.
smoke and mirrors matt. at one time i was getting requests from levels of
management above those who filed suit. legally it all boiled down to using
"jeep" in the domain.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
my 03 is khaki/ black as well. Seems to be a well liked combination. It
makes sense for some dumbass to decide it is no longer available. maybe
that was their way of differentiating an 03/04 from an 05 ?
=== you must first take out MYUGLYSISTER to email me privately ===
"Jeff" <jrhiltz@av.easlink.ca> wrote in message
news:VXLJd.36798$Qb.23245@edtnps89...
> That's a beauty color! I drive an '03 in that color with a black
> top....there's one around town with a Tan roof and it jus doesn't look
> right...it makes ya wonder what they are thinking?? good luck Nathan...
>
> --
> Jeff
> '03 TJ & '95 ZJ
> For offroad videos check my server @
> ftp://24.138.75.11
> "griffin" <gryffy@DELTHISshaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:u5HJd.175565$Xk.70301@pd7tw3no...
> > I dunno ...never seen that combo until you posted the pic but I really
> like
> > it ...looks great and would probably not show dirt too badly up here in
> the
> > salt belt.
> >
> > > ....now, if youve any insight as to why the black top and interior is
> > > available on all colors except the khaki please share.
> >
> >
>
>
makes sense for some dumbass to decide it is no longer available. maybe
that was their way of differentiating an 03/04 from an 05 ?
=== you must first take out MYUGLYSISTER to email me privately ===
"Jeff" <jrhiltz@av.easlink.ca> wrote in message
news:VXLJd.36798$Qb.23245@edtnps89...
> That's a beauty color! I drive an '03 in that color with a black
> top....there's one around town with a Tan roof and it jus doesn't look
> right...it makes ya wonder what they are thinking?? good luck Nathan...
>
> --
> Jeff
> '03 TJ & '95 ZJ
> For offroad videos check my server @
> ftp://24.138.75.11
> "griffin" <gryffy@DELTHISshaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:u5HJd.175565$Xk.70301@pd7tw3no...
> > I dunno ...never seen that combo until you posted the pic but I really
> like
> > it ...looks great and would probably not show dirt too badly up here in
> the
> > salt belt.
> >
> > > ....now, if youve any insight as to why the black top and interior is
> > > available on all colors except the khaki please share.
> >
> >
>
>
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
my 03 is khaki/ black as well. Seems to be a well liked combination. It
makes sense for some dumbass to decide it is no longer available. maybe
that was their way of differentiating an 03/04 from an 05 ?
=== you must first take out MYUGLYSISTER to email me privately ===
"Jeff" <jrhiltz@av.easlink.ca> wrote in message
news:VXLJd.36798$Qb.23245@edtnps89...
> That's a beauty color! I drive an '03 in that color with a black
> top....there's one around town with a Tan roof and it jus doesn't look
> right...it makes ya wonder what they are thinking?? good luck Nathan...
>
> --
> Jeff
> '03 TJ & '95 ZJ
> For offroad videos check my server @
> ftp://24.138.75.11
> "griffin" <gryffy@DELTHISshaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:u5HJd.175565$Xk.70301@pd7tw3no...
> > I dunno ...never seen that combo until you posted the pic but I really
> like
> > it ...looks great and would probably not show dirt too badly up here in
> the
> > salt belt.
> >
> > > ....now, if youve any insight as to why the black top and interior is
> > > available on all colors except the khaki please share.
> >
> >
>
>
makes sense for some dumbass to decide it is no longer available. maybe
that was their way of differentiating an 03/04 from an 05 ?
=== you must first take out MYUGLYSISTER to email me privately ===
"Jeff" <jrhiltz@av.easlink.ca> wrote in message
news:VXLJd.36798$Qb.23245@edtnps89...
> That's a beauty color! I drive an '03 in that color with a black
> top....there's one around town with a Tan roof and it jus doesn't look
> right...it makes ya wonder what they are thinking?? good luck Nathan...
>
> --
> Jeff
> '03 TJ & '95 ZJ
> For offroad videos check my server @
> ftp://24.138.75.11
> "griffin" <gryffy@DELTHISshaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:u5HJd.175565$Xk.70301@pd7tw3no...
> > I dunno ...never seen that combo until you posted the pic but I really
> like
> > it ...looks great and would probably not show dirt too badly up here in
> the
> > salt belt.
> >
> > > ....now, if youve any insight as to why the black top and interior is
> > > available on all colors except the khaki please share.
> >
> >
>
>
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: boneheads at jeep corporate
my 03 is khaki/ black as well. Seems to be a well liked combination. It
makes sense for some dumbass to decide it is no longer available. maybe
that was their way of differentiating an 03/04 from an 05 ?
=== you must first take out MYUGLYSISTER to email me privately ===
"Jeff" <jrhiltz@av.easlink.ca> wrote in message
news:VXLJd.36798$Qb.23245@edtnps89...
> That's a beauty color! I drive an '03 in that color with a black
> top....there's one around town with a Tan roof and it jus doesn't look
> right...it makes ya wonder what they are thinking?? good luck Nathan...
>
> --
> Jeff
> '03 TJ & '95 ZJ
> For offroad videos check my server @
> ftp://24.138.75.11
> "griffin" <gryffy@DELTHISshaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:u5HJd.175565$Xk.70301@pd7tw3no...
> > I dunno ...never seen that combo until you posted the pic but I really
> like
> > it ...looks great and would probably not show dirt too badly up here in
> the
> > salt belt.
> >
> > > ....now, if youve any insight as to why the black top and interior is
> > > available on all colors except the khaki please share.
> >
> >
>
>
makes sense for some dumbass to decide it is no longer available. maybe
that was their way of differentiating an 03/04 from an 05 ?
=== you must first take out MYUGLYSISTER to email me privately ===
"Jeff" <jrhiltz@av.easlink.ca> wrote in message
news:VXLJd.36798$Qb.23245@edtnps89...
> That's a beauty color! I drive an '03 in that color with a black
> top....there's one around town with a Tan roof and it jus doesn't look
> right...it makes ya wonder what they are thinking?? good luck Nathan...
>
> --
> Jeff
> '03 TJ & '95 ZJ
> For offroad videos check my server @
> ftp://24.138.75.11
> "griffin" <gryffy@DELTHISshaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:u5HJd.175565$Xk.70301@pd7tw3no...
> > I dunno ...never seen that combo until you posted the pic but I really
> like
> > it ...looks great and would probably not show dirt too badly up here in
> the
> > salt belt.
> >
> > > ....now, if youve any insight as to why the black top and interior is
> > > available on all colors except the khaki please share.
> >
> >
>
>