Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> You running LPG and you complain saying your engine only has "50%
> of enough" in subject line post: Wagoneer Engine Replacement Choices ?
> What is this a blonde joke?


It made power fine before.

Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> You running LPG and you complain saying your engine only has "50%
> of enough" in subject line post: Wagoneer Engine Replacement Choices ?
> What is this a blonde joke?


It made power fine before.

Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

Then why don't put your money where your mouth is, and put it on
your vehicles! I'd like nothing better than it pull you to your death!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Bret Ludwig wrote:
><snip bullsh*t>

Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

Then why don't put your money where your mouth is, and put it on
your vehicles! I'd like nothing better than it pull you to your death!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Bret Ludwig wrote:
><snip bullsh*t>

Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

Then why don't put your money where your mouth is, and put it on
your vehicles! I'd like nothing better than it pull you to your death!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Bret Ludwig wrote:
><snip bullsh*t>

Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

Then he should have posted it as an information post, not as a troll
post.

Mike

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> I run LPG in my Wagoneer, so yes, I found it interesting.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:44A9A545.67890F2A@sympatico.ca...
> > Who besides you gives a ----?
> >
> > And if it took you that long to find that obscure of a 'one off' item to
> > prove Bill wrong, you are a total fool. LOL!
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> > Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> > Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> > (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
> >
> > Bret Ludwig wrote:
> > >

Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

Then he should have posted it as an information post, not as a troll
post.

Mike

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> I run LPG in my Wagoneer, so yes, I found it interesting.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:44A9A545.67890F2A@sympatico.ca...
> > Who besides you gives a ----?
> >
> > And if it took you that long to find that obscure of a 'one off' item to
> > prove Bill wrong, you are a total fool. LOL!
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> > Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> > Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> > (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
> >
> > Bret Ludwig wrote:
> > >

Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

Then he should have posted it as an information post, not as a troll
post.

Mike

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> I run LPG in my Wagoneer, so yes, I found it interesting.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:44A9A545.67890F2A@sympatico.ca...
> > Who besides you gives a ----?
> >
> > And if it took you that long to find that obscure of a 'one off' item to
> > prove Bill wrong, you are a total fool. LOL!
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> > Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> > Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> > (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
> >
> > Bret Ludwig wrote:
> > >

Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

Yup, it is quoted *when new* at 144hp for a 5.9 litre 360. Which is pitiful.
If it had a more respectible 280hp, that would be enough.
I wouldn't have thought that a drag racer like yourself would be defending
31hp per ton ?

Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:44AA1A17.9C10DE75@cox.net...
> You running LPG and you complain saying your engine only has "50%
> of enough" in subject line post: Wagoneer Engine Replacement Choices ?
> What is this a blonde joke?
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > I run LPG in my Wagoneer, so yes, I found it interesting.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

Re: Bill proven wrong some more (took some time).
 

Yup, it is quoted *when new* at 144hp for a 5.9 litre 360. Which is pitiful.
If it had a more respectible 280hp, that would be enough.
I wouldn't have thought that a drag racer like yourself would be defending
31hp per ton ?

Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:44AA1A17.9C10DE75@cox.net...
> You running LPG and you complain saying your engine only has "50%
> of enough" in subject line post: Wagoneer Engine Replacement Choices ?
> What is this a blonde joke?
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > I run LPG in my Wagoneer, so yes, I found it interesting.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ