BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
06-10-2004, 09:27 AM
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
Hi Dean,
Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
rock?
Thanks,
Steve
Dean wrote:
> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I watched how
> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
> tires.
>
> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>
> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
rock?
Thanks,
Steve
Dean wrote:
> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I watched how
> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
> tires.
>
> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>
> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
06-10-2004, 09:27 AM
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
Hi Dean,
Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
rock?
Thanks,
Steve
Dean wrote:
> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I watched how
> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
> tires.
>
> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>
> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
rock?
Thanks,
Steve
Dean wrote:
> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I watched how
> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
> tires.
>
> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>
> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
06-10-2004, 09:27 AM
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
Hi Dean,
Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
rock?
Thanks,
Steve
Dean wrote:
> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I watched how
> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
> tires.
>
> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>
> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
rock?
Thanks,
Steve
Dean wrote:
> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I watched how
> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were universally
> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps had MT/R's
> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle. The MT/R's
> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R owners did
> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than the other
> tires.
>
> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and probably another
> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>
> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the rocks.
06-10-2004, 05:35 PM
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
Steve wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
> BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
>
> Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
> the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
> rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
> rock?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Dean wrote:
>
>> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I
>> watched how
>> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were
>> universally
>> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps
>> had MT/R's
>> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle.
>> The MT/R's
>> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R
>> owners did
>> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than
>> the other
>> tires.
>> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and
>> probably another
>> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the
>> rocks.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
Steve wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
> BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
>
> Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
> the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
> rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
> rock?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Dean wrote:
>
>> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I
>> watched how
>> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were
>> universally
>> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps
>> had MT/R's
>> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle.
>> The MT/R's
>> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R
>> owners did
>> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than
>> the other
>> tires.
>> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and
>> probably another
>> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the
>> rocks.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
06-10-2004, 05:35 PM
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
Steve wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
> BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
>
> Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
> the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
> rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
> rock?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Dean wrote:
>
>> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I
>> watched how
>> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were
>> universally
>> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps
>> had MT/R's
>> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle.
>> The MT/R's
>> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R
>> owners did
>> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than
>> the other
>> tires.
>> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and
>> probably another
>> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the
>> rocks.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
Steve wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
> BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
>
> Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
> the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
> rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
> rock?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Dean wrote:
>
>> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I
>> watched how
>> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were
>> universally
>> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps
>> had MT/R's
>> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle.
>> The MT/R's
>> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R
>> owners did
>> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than
>> the other
>> tires.
>> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and
>> probably another
>> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the
>> rocks.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
06-10-2004, 05:35 PM
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
Steve wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
> BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
>
> Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
> the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
> rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
> rock?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Dean wrote:
>
>> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I
>> watched how
>> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were
>> universally
>> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps
>> had MT/R's
>> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle.
>> The MT/R's
>> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R
>> owners did
>> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than
>> the other
>> tires.
>> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and
>> probably another
>> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the
>> rocks.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
Steve wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
> BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
>
> Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
> the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
> rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
> rock?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Dean wrote:
>
>> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I
>> watched how
>> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were
>> universally
>> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps
>> had MT/R's
>> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle.
>> The MT/R's
>> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R
>> owners did
>> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than
>> the other
>> tires.
>> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and
>> probably another
>> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the
>> rocks.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
06-10-2004, 05:35 PM
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
Steve wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
> BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
>
> Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
> the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
> rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
> rock?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Dean wrote:
>
>> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I
>> watched how
>> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were
>> universally
>> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps
>> had MT/R's
>> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle.
>> The MT/R's
>> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R
>> owners did
>> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than
>> the other
>> tires.
>> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and
>> probably another
>> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the
>> rocks.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
Steve wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> Do you recall if any of the BFG MTs were siped? I imagine that siping a
> BFG MT would to some extent close the performance gap with the MT/R.
>
> Interesting that MT/Rs outperformed BFG MTs in mud. Would you say that
> the difference between the two tires was as dramatic as it was on the
> rock? Are we talking deep mud here or just a few inches on top of smooth
> rock?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Dean wrote:
>
>> My baby needs new shoes too, so during the Moab Easter Jeep safari I
>> watched how
>> well the different tires behaved on the slick rock. The MT/R's were
>> universally
>> better than the BFG MT's. On every obstacle I could tell which Jeeps
>> had MT/R's
>> vs anything else by how they went up, down or across the obstacle.
>> The MT/R's
>> were better on dry slick rock, wet slick rock, and mud. But the MT/R
>> owners did
>> mention that they seemed to be getting torn up and wearing faster than
>> the other
>> tires.
>> If the BFG MT's wear as well as my BFG AT's, 40,000+ miles and
>> probably another
>> 10,000 to go, the BFG MT's might be your best choice.
>> That said I'm buying the MT/R's. They were THAT much better on the
>> rocks.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
06-10-2004, 06:39 PM
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
Either one of them will perform well in mud, judging by their tread
design, they can't clean:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rangler+MT%2FR
and
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rrain+T%2FA+KM
To clean you need the old military design or what is used on farm
tractors, or this off road use only:
http://www.sandtiresunlimited.com/sandtire1.html#1500
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
twaldron wrote:
>
> I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
> some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
design, they can't clean:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rangler+MT%2FR
and
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rrain+T%2FA+KM
To clean you need the old military design or what is used on farm
tractors, or this off road use only:
http://www.sandtiresunlimited.com/sandtire1.html#1500
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
twaldron wrote:
>
> I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
> some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
06-10-2004, 06:39 PM
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
Either one of them will perform well in mud, judging by their tread
design, they can't clean:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rangler+MT%2FR
and
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rrain+T%2FA+KM
To clean you need the old military design or what is used on farm
tractors, or this off road use only:
http://www.sandtiresunlimited.com/sandtire1.html#1500
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
twaldron wrote:
>
> I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
> some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
design, they can't clean:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rangler+MT%2FR
and
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rrain+T%2FA+KM
To clean you need the old military design or what is used on farm
tractors, or this off road use only:
http://www.sandtiresunlimited.com/sandtire1.html#1500
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
twaldron wrote:
>
> I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
> some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
06-10-2004, 06:39 PM
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG MT's vs. Goodyear MT/R's
Either one of them will perform well in mud, judging by their tread
design, they can't clean:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rangler+MT%2FR
and
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rrain+T%2FA+KM
To clean you need the old military design or what is used on farm
tractors, or this off road use only:
http://www.sandtiresunlimited.com/sandtire1.html#1500
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
twaldron wrote:
>
> I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
> some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
design, they can't clean:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rangler+MT%2FR
and
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....rrain+T%2FA+KM
To clean you need the old military design or what is used on farm
tractors, or this off road use only:
http://www.sandtiresunlimited.com/sandtire1.html#1500
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
twaldron wrote:
>
> I don't believe the MT/Rs outperform BFG MTs in the mud. Care to post
> some tests that show that? I'd like to believe it.
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
