Bill,

I followed their break-in procedure which, although not identical to the
ones on the web page you listed (e.g. accelerate to 55 MPH rather than 50
MPH, repeat 10 times rather than several times, etc...), are probably close
enough. Besides, their engine, their break-in procedure.

And even if I didn't, I don't understand how this could cause damage to the
cylinder walls.

Thanks.
--
Michael White "To protect people from the effects of folly is to
fill the world with fools." -Herbert Spencer

L.W.(ßill) ------ III (----------@***.net) wrote on Wednesday 22 June 2005
11:41 pm:

> I think you may have messed up breaking your engine in, like the
> first fifty miles are critical to break in the rings, forcing a dry wall
> condition to burn in them in by lugging the engine in top gear and hard
> accelerating from about thirty to sixty over and over and over:
> http://performanceunlimited.com/docu...nebreakin.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Michael White wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I'm looking for some advice on this. First, some history:
>>
>> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
>> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
>> Missouri.
>> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
>> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI + Clifford
>> valve
>> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a third
>> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
>>
>> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using about
>> 3-4
>> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression test
>> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable (upper
>> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
>> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out everything
>> else,
>> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
>> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others are
>> at
>> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been in
>> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
>>
>> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel mixture
>> was
>> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to Hesco
>> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't sound
>> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
>> miles
>> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this was
>> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
>> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
>>
>> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily (I'm
>> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
>> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
>> Neither
>> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> Michael White "To protect people from the effects of folly is to
>> fill the world with fools." -Herbert Spencer
>>
>> P.S. I'm not buying anything like this on-line again.

 

Bill,

I followed their break-in procedure which, although not identical to the
ones on the web page you listed (e.g. accelerate to 55 MPH rather than 50
MPH, repeat 10 times rather than several times, etc...), are probably close
enough. Besides, their engine, their break-in procedure.

And even if I didn't, I don't understand how this could cause damage to the
cylinder walls.

Thanks.
--
Michael White "To protect people from the effects of folly is to
fill the world with fools." -Herbert Spencer

L.W.(ßill) ------ III (----------@***.net) wrote on Wednesday 22 June 2005
11:41 pm:

> I think you may have messed up breaking your engine in, like the
> first fifty miles are critical to break in the rings, forcing a dry wall
> condition to burn in them in by lugging the engine in top gear and hard
> accelerating from about thirty to sixty over and over and over:
> http://performanceunlimited.com/docu...nebreakin.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Michael White wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I'm looking for some advice on this. First, some history:
>>
>> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
>> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
>> Missouri.
>> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
>> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI + Clifford
>> valve
>> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a third
>> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
>>
>> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using about
>> 3-4
>> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression test
>> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable (upper
>> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
>> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out everything
>> else,
>> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
>> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others are
>> at
>> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been in
>> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
>>
>> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel mixture
>> was
>> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to Hesco
>> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't sound
>> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
>> miles
>> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this was
>> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
>> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
>>
>> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily (I'm
>> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
>> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
>> Neither
>> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> Michael White "To protect people from the effects of folly is to
>> fill the world with fools." -Herbert Spencer
>>
>> P.S. I'm not buying anything like this on-line again.

 

Bill,

I followed their break-in procedure which, although not identical to the
ones on the web page you listed (e.g. accelerate to 55 MPH rather than 50
MPH, repeat 10 times rather than several times, etc...), are probably close
enough. Besides, their engine, their break-in procedure.

And even if I didn't, I don't understand how this could cause damage to the
cylinder walls.

Thanks.
--
Michael White "To protect people from the effects of folly is to
fill the world with fools." -Herbert Spencer

L.W.(ßill) ------ III (----------@***.net) wrote on Wednesday 22 June 2005
11:41 pm:

> I think you may have messed up breaking your engine in, like the
> first fifty miles are critical to break in the rings, forcing a dry wall
> condition to burn in them in by lugging the engine in top gear and hard
> accelerating from about thirty to sixty over and over and over:
> http://performanceunlimited.com/docu...nebreakin.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Michael White wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I'm looking for some advice on this. First, some history:
>>
>> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
>> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
>> Missouri.
>> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
>> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI + Clifford
>> valve
>> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a third
>> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
>>
>> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using about
>> 3-4
>> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression test
>> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable (upper
>> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
>> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out everything
>> else,
>> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
>> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others are
>> at
>> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been in
>> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
>>
>> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel mixture
>> was
>> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to Hesco
>> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't sound
>> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
>> miles
>> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this was
>> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
>> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
>>
>> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily (I'm
>> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
>> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
>> Neither
>> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> Michael White "To protect people from the effects of folly is to
>> fill the world with fools." -Herbert Spencer
>>
>> P.S. I'm not buying anything like this on-line again.

 

This doesn't help, but three engines gone bad? Some folks might take that
as a sign to get a different vehicle....


> >> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
> >> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
> >> Missouri.
> >> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
> >> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI + Clifford
> >> valve
> >> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a
third
> >> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
> >>
> >> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using
about
> >> 3-4
> >> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression
test
> >> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable
(upper
> >> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
> >> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out
everything
> >> else,
> >> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
> >> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others are
> >> at
> >> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been in
> >> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
> >>
> >> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel mixture
> >> was
> >> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to Hesco
> >> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't
sound
> >> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
> >> miles
> >> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this
was
> >> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
> >> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
> >>
> >> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily
(I'm
> >> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
> >> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
> >> Neither
> >> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
> >>

 

This doesn't help, but three engines gone bad? Some folks might take that
as a sign to get a different vehicle....


> >> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
> >> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
> >> Missouri.
> >> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
> >> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI + Clifford
> >> valve
> >> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a
third
> >> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
> >>
> >> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using
about
> >> 3-4
> >> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression
test
> >> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable
(upper
> >> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
> >> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out
everything
> >> else,
> >> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
> >> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others are
> >> at
> >> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been in
> >> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
> >>
> >> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel mixture
> >> was
> >> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to Hesco
> >> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't
sound
> >> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
> >> miles
> >> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this
was
> >> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
> >> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
> >>
> >> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily
(I'm
> >> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
> >> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
> >> Neither
> >> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
> >>

 

This doesn't help, but three engines gone bad? Some folks might take that
as a sign to get a different vehicle....


> >> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
> >> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
> >> Missouri.
> >> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
> >> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI + Clifford
> >> valve
> >> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a
third
> >> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
> >>
> >> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using
about
> >> 3-4
> >> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression
test
> >> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable
(upper
> >> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
> >> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out
everything
> >> else,
> >> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
> >> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others are
> >> at
> >> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been in
> >> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
> >>
> >> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel mixture
> >> was
> >> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to Hesco
> >> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't
sound
> >> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
> >> miles
> >> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this
was
> >> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
> >> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
> >>
> >> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily
(I'm
> >> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
> >> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
> >> Neither
> >> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
> >>

 

This doesn't help, but three engines gone bad? Some folks might take that
as a sign to get a different vehicle....


> >> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
> >> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
> >> Missouri.
> >> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
> >> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI + Clifford
> >> valve
> >> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a
third
> >> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
> >>
> >> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using
about
> >> 3-4
> >> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression
test
> >> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable
(upper
> >> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
> >> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out
everything
> >> else,
> >> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
> >> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others are
> >> at
> >> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been in
> >> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
> >>
> >> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel mixture
> >> was
> >> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to Hesco
> >> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't
sound
> >> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
> >> miles
> >> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this
was
> >> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
> >> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
> >>
> >> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily
(I'm
> >> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
> >> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
> >> Neither
> >> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
> >>

 

If the rings are not staggered you can pump a lot of oil out but you are
also producing a smoke screen behind you. I think I would be on the phone
to find out why you received three bad engines. Anything mass produced will
occasionally produce a defective product. Three in a row implies something
different. What reasoning (excuse) are they offering?


"wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:h9idnW5VsuGWHCbfRVn-qQ@speakeasy.net...
>
> This doesn't help, but three engines gone bad? Some folks might take that
> as a sign to get a different vehicle....
>
>
>> >> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
>> >> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
>> >> Missouri.
>> >> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
>> >> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI +
>> >> Clifford
>> >> valve
>> >> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a
> third
>> >> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
>> >>
>> >> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using
> about
>> >> 3-4
>> >> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression
> test
>> >> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable
> (upper
>> >> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
>> >> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out
> everything
>> >> else,
>> >> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
>> >> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others
>> >> are
>> >> at
>> >> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been
>> >> in
>> >> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
>> >>
>> >> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel
>> >> mixture
>> >> was
>> >> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to
>> >> Hesco
>> >> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't
> sound
>> >> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
>> >> miles
>> >> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this
> was
>> >> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
>> >> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
>> >>
>> >> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily
> (I'm
>> >> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
>> >> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
>> >> Neither
>> >> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
>> >>
>

 

If the rings are not staggered you can pump a lot of oil out but you are
also producing a smoke screen behind you. I think I would be on the phone
to find out why you received three bad engines. Anything mass produced will
occasionally produce a defective product. Three in a row implies something
different. What reasoning (excuse) are they offering?


"wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:h9idnW5VsuGWHCbfRVn-qQ@speakeasy.net...
>
> This doesn't help, but three engines gone bad? Some folks might take that
> as a sign to get a different vehicle....
>
>
>> >> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
>> >> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
>> >> Missouri.
>> >> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
>> >> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI +
>> >> Clifford
>> >> valve
>> >> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a
> third
>> >> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
>> >>
>> >> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using
> about
>> >> 3-4
>> >> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression
> test
>> >> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable
> (upper
>> >> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
>> >> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out
> everything
>> >> else,
>> >> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
>> >> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others
>> >> are
>> >> at
>> >> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been
>> >> in
>> >> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
>> >>
>> >> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel
>> >> mixture
>> >> was
>> >> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to
>> >> Hesco
>> >> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't
> sound
>> >> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
>> >> miles
>> >> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this
> was
>> >> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
>> >> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
>> >>
>> >> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily
> (I'm
>> >> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
>> >> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
>> >> Neither
>> >> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
>> >>
>

 

If the rings are not staggered you can pump a lot of oil out but you are
also producing a smoke screen behind you. I think I would be on the phone
to find out why you received three bad engines. Anything mass produced will
occasionally produce a defective product. Three in a row implies something
different. What reasoning (excuse) are they offering?


"wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:h9idnW5VsuGWHCbfRVn-qQ@speakeasy.net...
>
> This doesn't help, but three engines gone bad? Some folks might take that
> as a sign to get a different vehicle....
>
>
>> >> In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from
>> >> PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of
>> >> Missouri.
>> >> That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed
>> >> the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI +
>> >> Clifford
>> >> valve
>> >> combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a
> third
>> >> engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
>> >>
>> >> I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using
> about
>> >> 3-4
>> >> quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression
> test
>> >> passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable
> (upper
>> >> teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK.
>> >> Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out
> everything
>> >> else,
>> >> but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a
>> >> leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others
>> >> are
>> >> at
>> >> about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been
>> >> in
>> >> my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
>> >>
>> >> PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel
>> >> mixture
>> >> was
>> >> so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to
>> >> Hesco
>> >> about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't
> sound
>> >> right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two
>> >> miles
>> >> gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this
> was
>> >> true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I
>> >> don't think that could contribute to this problem.
>> >>
>> >> Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily
> (I'm
>> >> supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll
>> >> either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core.
>> >> Neither
>> >> option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
>> >>
>