Re: the whining loser is back
 

JLT1 wrote:

> MISTER putz to you, you meaningless to the world little piece of crap. You
> were amusing for a moment. I for one thought maybe you were just a bit to
> "tense" or something. You might have spent too much time in a gym locker
> once upon a time or something, I really don't care.


Now let's see you rant on for a huge breathless paragraph block, proving
how much you "don't care".

>You are evidentially one
> who talks sh*t anonymously to people great distances away, kind of like a
> dog who only barks in reverse. I only wish that, when you finally get the
> false sense of security you would need to pop off to someone within arms
> reach, that I was present to witness it.

I talk this way right to people's faces if they deserve it, and if they
don't like it, tough. If they decide since they lost the argument and
they need to react physically, they find out they'll lose there, too.

>Stop barking little doggy, first
> and foremost, all here is fairly meaningless, and if you don't like Nathan
> for some reason, here's a hint, ignore his posts.

Funny, if you don't like mine, ignore mine. But you can't take your own
advice, can you, you nut-licking ------? That's because your advice is
worth about half a piece of ----. On a *good* day.

> I suppose I would rather have you here, annoying people, than have you in
> another room beating on your old lady or kid or something.

The only one with violent tendencies here is you, beetlebrow.

>I feel that only
> a very few in the world deserve to get the ever-loving sh*t beaten out of
> them. Those few are the overly rude. You don't seem half as interested in
> posting an opinion as you do in pushing buttons.

Here's my opinion: You're a sorry-assed, pent-up, angry dumb----.

> I play that game. I play it
> to completion and would do so at the drop of the hat. I only say this
> because people seem to have forgotten that there are millions of people out
> there like me, who would drag your corpse up and down the street until only
> your shirt collar was left, were you to try this crap in person.


Typical neanderthal redneck ----head. How quickly you resort to violent
threats. You'd murder someone over _words_. That's because you've got a
brain the size of a pea. Go ahead, bring a rope. Bring a rope to a gun
fight, you inbred sister-------- dumbshit.

> If you
> behave like this to the general public, you will meet one someday.
> In my attempt to guide this to a humorous dismissal, you name call. So be
> it. You have been humorously dismissed, and maybe that is precisely what you
> have been your whole life by the entire world, maybe that is what this is
> about. Again, I don't care.


HAHAHA! Jesus, for someone who doesn't care you just turned into a
pathetic version of the Hulk. Oooh, scawy! Go see a shrink for your
violent delusions. I feel sorry for the next dog you kick, limpdick.

Say, Old Bill, aren't this homo's violent threats against the charter?
Quick! Send out some worthless complaints to seventy different ISPs!

Re: the whining pussy whipped loser is back
 

In article <3F1F5CAB.9B0E5C50@cox.net>, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------
III <----------@cox.net> writes:

> I remember way back in my school days it was only the little girls
>whom would say "I'm going to tell".

They didn't say it they sang it, Nah Nah N Nah Nah....
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Re: the whining loser is back
 

I agree. Whoever this "Jeffrey Leonard" is, he/she/it obviously has no
rational point to make. When individuals have to use insults (and this troll
has insulted everyone that he/she/it has addressed here) it is obvious that
the troll has nothing constructive to contribute. I would suspect that this
individual has just recently figured out how to create a "bogus" identity
and is having a grand old time test driving it. (I could be mistaken and
this could be the troll's real identity, which would indicate that this
individual is not as bright as is indicated by the caliber of the posts.)
Hopefully, periodic complaints to his/her/its ISP will get the account
removed, but, as an alternative, I, for one am kill filing this troll. I
suggest that if the majority of us do this, the individual will either go
away (due to lack of an audience) or at the least, retreat back into the
woodwork.

"Simple" <@@plutus@shaw.ca@@> wrote in message
news:VDFTa.496208$3C2.13322708@news3.calgary.shaw. ca...
> I've seen some really nasty posts here.
>
> Nathan, Bill, Mike, and everyone else help many people in this newsgroup
> hundreds of times a week. To be honest, I like reading the long stories
and
> long threads. Please don't give any Free Speech BS for exercising your
> rights. If you don't have any constructive critism, possibly bite your
> toung (your your fingers), and move on to the next post. I would hate to
> see things stop being as good as they are due to a few bad eggs.
>
> For whatever it matters, you guys have helped me, and I hope and wish
people
> were more polite to those who overextend themselves by helping many other
> individuals when there is no obligation for them to do so.
>
> Keep up the good work Nathan, Bill and Mike! You guys rock!
>
> Simple
>
>

Re: back
 

Nate, that does sound an awful lot like the swimmer in the 20 mile race that
swam 19 miles, got too tired to finish, and turned around and swam back...
;)

"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vhu056iqp87p78@corp.supernews.com...
> I am going to avoid the whole whiner thing going on elsewhere, and express
> my sincere regret that your move went so badly. I wonder, like some of the
> others, why you turned around and came home so close to your destination.
> Perhaps being there would give me more insight to the burdens of living in
a
> broken down rental truck, but turning around and heading for NC had to
only
> lengthen the ordeal, and it gets you back to where you started with
several
> thousand dollars ------ across the country.
>
> Maybe next time you want to move, you should bundle up a pile of twenties
> and send them to me, and save the grief of loading and unloading the
truck.
> ;-)
>
>
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:b_dTa.335124$jp.8774928@twister.southeast.rr. com...
> > i dont really know where to begin to explain the sequence of events that
> > took place over the past couple of weeks. it started with picking up a
> uhaul
> > truck in fayetteville, nc and returning it in fayetteville, nc some 14
> days
> > later.
> >
> > the truck i was given was not the truck i reserved 3 weeks prior, and i
> > could not get a satisfactory response from any uhaul representative. i
> > reserved a diesel powered 26' "super mover", but what i got instead was
an
> > 82 model underpowered gas truck that was missing most of its dash and
had
> > loose/exposed wiring that rubbed against your leg. when i tried to push
> the
> > wiring back into the dash, the truck would knock off. since we were out
of
> > time i decided to make the best of it hoping it would make the trip.
> >
> > aside from endless breakdowns along the way (most of which i had to
repair
> > myself for various reasons), the real troubles started in the rocky
> > mountains.
> >
> > ive written a 7 page letter to uhaul and here is one small section of
that
> > letter that explains the straw that broke the camels back:
> >
> > ------------------------
> > The truck did "ok" up I-94. It was a real tease to see just how
beautiful
> > Montana really is and despite all the troubles I'd had along the way, I
> was
> > still just happy to finally be in "Big Sky Country". When I-94 and I-90
> > came together my happiness of being in Montana was quickly replaced by
> fear,
> > apprehension, and anger once again. Bozeman Pass was a nightmare, as
well
> > as all the other "passes" along the way between Billings and Butte.
> Passing
> > signs that read "Chain Up Area 1/2 Mile" struck fear in me as I quickly
> came
> > to learn that those signs meant another steep grade that I might or
might
> > not make. The truck would downshift, backfire, downshift, etc. until it
> > dropped into 1st. gear where it would drop to 4 mph screaming as it
> crawled
> > along impeding traffic. It was around Bozeman Pass that I had to explain
> to
> > my 10 year old why so many people were honking and flipping us off as
they
> > finally worked their way around us.
> >
> > The grade that changed everything was the Continental Divide (the first
> time
> > you cross it heading towards Great Falls). The truck screamed until it
> came
> > to a total stop not even 1 mile into the climb where it sat there and
> > "moaned" but would not move. I got out of the truck (stopped in the
middle
> > of the interstate!) and backed my Jeep Wrangler off the auto transport
> > trailer hoping that would be enough to get the truck going again. The
> truck
> > moved less than 100 feet before it came to a dead stop again. If
> everything
> > we owned had not been in the back of the Uhaul truck I think I would
have
> > got in my Jeep Wrangler at that point and drove away without ever
looking
> > back. Since that was not an option, we finally worked the truck off onto
> > what there is of a shoulder and attempted to call Uhaul for assistance.
> > Without cell phone service in that area however, there was nothing I
could
> > do. About an hour later a truck driver stopped to help and towed the
Uhaul
> > over the Continental Divide.
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > While not quite as bad since we were coming off the mountain, the dozen
or
> > so mountain passes that we had just climbed were no fun going over from
> the
> > opposite direction. The automatic transmission offered no engine
braking,
> > and the truck constantly tried to run away coming down the grades. My
wife
> > (in her Jeep Cherokee behind me) had to back off because her eyes were
> > watering from the fumes generated by my burning brakes.
> > ----------------------------------------
> >
> > i may post the entire letter at a later time, but that gives you a
sample
> of
> > the problems we had along the way. prior to trying I-90, we attempted to
> > take 200 into great falls and had to be pulled over the grades outside
of
> > belt because the truck just didnt have the balls to pull itself. im
> > referencing the first grade just past eddies corner, it didnt even make
it
> > to the steeper grades at belt.
> >
> > by the time we got into montana, the wifey hated it (due to all the
> problems
> > along the way). with tears in her eyes she begged me "please take me
home,
> > nathan" so thats just what i did. there was no reasoning, there was no
> point
> > in even trying as i could see it in her eyes that i had no choice. now
im
> > stuck here again in this same house in this same -----hole neighborhood
in
> > this same -----hole state with the only difference being that now im
> roughly
> > $5,000 poorer than i was a few weeks ago. "luckily" the house didnt
close
> > when it was supposed to which made it possible for me to break the
selling
> > contract without fear of suit, but i refunded the buyers expenses
(roughly
> > $600 for home inspection, mortgage fees, termite inspection, etc.)
anyway.
> >
> > there are a few things i learned along the way.
> > 1) iowa is one huge cornfield with a road going down the middle
> > 2) fill up in des moines because you wont find gas again
> > 3) ever other car in indiana is a highway patrolman
> > 4) minnesota is beautiful, particularly around alexandria
> > 5) north dakota has free internet access at rest stops!
> > 6) sadly, the indians on the crow reservation live up to their
> stereotyping
> > 7) uhaul does very bad business
> >
> > to make it worse, while parked outside of my hotel room in illinois the
> cab
> > of the uhaul got broken into (even though everything was hidden behind
the
> > seat). they got my laptop (ancient anyway, but still), my digi-cam, my
> gps,
> > and my cobra cb that i just bought before the trip.
> >
> > at this point im not sure what our next step will be. im not happy in
> north
> > carolina, but we need to regroup before we consider another move. i
> > absolutely loved montana, but its going to take some convincing before
the
> > wifey will try that again. no amount of description or even pictures
can
> > prepare you for the awesome, rugged beauty of montana and i know ill
make
> it
> > back.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> >
> >
>
>

Re: the whining loser is back
 

Good advice but some people find it fun to play with them. Why not let an
old man have his fun? ;o)

Earle

"TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:x_idne2KKq9zUYKiU-KYvg@comcast.com...
> I agree. Whoever this "Jeffrey Leonard" is, he/she/it obviously has no
> rational point to make. When individuals have to use insults (and this
troll
> has insulted everyone that he/she/it has addressed here) it is obvious
that
> the troll has nothing constructive to contribute. I would suspect that
this
> individual has just recently figured out how to create a "bogus" identity
> and is having a grand old time test driving it. (I could be mistaken and
> this could be the troll's real identity, which would indicate that this
> individual is not as bright as is indicated by the caliber of the posts.)
> Hopefully, periodic complaints to his/her/its ISP will get the account
> removed, but, as an alternative, I, for one am kill filing this troll. I
> suggest that if the majority of us do this, the individual will either go
> away (due to lack of an audience) or at the least, retreat back into the
> woodwork.
>
> "Simple" <@@plutus@shaw.ca@@> wrote in message
> news:VDFTa.496208$3C2.13322708@news3.calgary.shaw. ca...
> > I've seen some really nasty posts here.
> >
> > Nathan, Bill, Mike, and everyone else help many people in this newsgroup
> > hundreds of times a week. To be honest, I like reading the long stories
> and
> > long threads. Please don't give any Free Speech BS for exercising your
> > rights. If you don't have any constructive critism, possibly bite your
> > toung (your your fingers), and move on to the next post. I would hate
to
> > see things stop being as good as they are due to a few bad eggs.
> >
> > For whatever it matters, you guys have helped me, and I hope and wish
> people
> > were more polite to those who overextend themselves by helping many
other
> > individuals when there is no obligation for them to do so.
> >
> > Keep up the good work Nathan, Bill and Mike! You guys rock!
> >
> > Simple
> >
> >
>
>

Re: back
 

> Actually, that sounds like a REALLY GOOD idea, Mike.
>
> Nathan, maybe you should consider a Montana vacation with your wife and
> family soon. Spend a week or two out there checking out the entire area to
> "help" your wife and family (and you) decide if you really like it there.
>
> Tom
And I bet a visit or short stay with some of those of us who already
live out this way - and managed to convince our wives to move - could
help with the convincing. Women just seem to need more reassurance
when they get outside their comfort zones. JELo in
WYO




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

Re: the whining loser is back
 

JLT1 wrote:
> I made no threats. #1.

--------. You're a liar.
>
> And you're flattering yourself if you think you are worth becoming angry
> over.
>
> Am I breaking this up enough for you to follow?
>
> I apologize if large groups of words intimidate you.
>
> What "rope"?

I'm sorry. I guess I'm unfamiliar with your tools, ghoul. What do you
usually drag your corpses with, freak?

>
> You seem fascinated with fags, what is really bothering you I wonder?
> Friendly uncle in your past?

Speaking from experience?
>
> I see you as the angry one here.
>
> NEED to react physically doesn't enter into it.

So it's more of a compulsion on your part.
>
> I see no need to continue this here. Stop by, I'll buy you a beer.

No, no. I'll buy YOU one. A very special glass of beer.
>
> Please do not confuse the above with a peace offering of ANY kind.
>
Uh huh. Now you're backing down, and for a guy who said who didn't care,
TWICE, you're sure doing an awful lot of caring, twinkeltoes.

Re: the whining pussy whipped loser is back
 

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:

> In article <3F1F5CAB.9B0E5C50@cox.net>, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------
> III <----------@cox.net> writes:
>
>
>>I remember way back in my school days it was only the little girls
>>whom would say "I'm going to tell".
>
>
> They didn't say it they sang it, Nah Nah N Nah Nah....
> * * *

Is that when they caught Lou Ellen wearing girls' panties?

Re: the whining loser is back
 

TJim wrote:

> I agree. Whoever this "Jeffrey Leonard" is, he/she/it obviously has no
> rational point to make. When individuals have to use insults (and this troll
> has insulted everyone that he/she/it has addressed here) it is obvious that
> the troll has nothing constructive to contribute. I would suspect that this
> individual has just recently figured out how to create a "bogus" identity
> and is having a grand old time test driving it. (I could be mistaken and
> this could be the troll's real identity, which would indicate that this
> individual is not as bright as is indicated by the caliber of the posts.)
> Hopefully, periodic complaints to his/her/its ISP will get the account
> removed, but, as an alternative, I, for one am kill filing this troll. I
> suggest that if the majority of us do this, the individual will either go
> away (due to lack of an audience) or at the least, retreat back into the
> woodwork.


I love it. What will the complaints be about? Not talking about Jeeps?
ooops! I wish I could talk about Jeeps as much as you just did!

The hilarious part is how much talk will be about ignoring and
killfiling, and how little of that will actually get done.
>
> "Simple" <@@plutus@shaw.ca@@> wrote in message
> news:VDFTa.496208$3C2.13322708@news3.calgary.shaw. ca...
>
>>I've seen some really nasty posts here.
>>
>>Nathan, Bill, Mike, and everyone else help many people in this newsgroup
>>hundreds of times a week. To be honest, I like reading the long stories
>
> and
>
>>long threads. Please don't give any Free Speech BS for exercising your
>>rights. If you don't have any constructive critism, possibly bite your
>>toung (your your fingers), and move on to the next post. I would hate to
>>see things stop being as good as they are due to a few bad eggs.
>>
>>For whatever it matters, you guys have helped me, and I hope and wish
>
> people
>
>>were more polite to those who overextend themselves by helping many other
>>individuals when there is no obligation for them to do so.
>>
>>Keep up the good work Nathan, Bill and Mike! You guys rock!
>>
>>Simple
>>
>>
>
>
>

Re: the whining loser is back
 

Earle, be my guest. You're welcome to have all the fun you want. ;) I
actually followed the thread for a while just for my own amusement, but that
ended when the troll started threatening people. People like that are a
waste of space.
I am certainly not one to deny an "old man" his fun, though... ;) feel free
to feed the troll all you want... just don't leave the gate unlocked when
you leave the zoo... ;)
TJim

"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bform1$h164m$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Good advice but some people find it fun to play with them. Why not let an
> old man have his fun? ;o)
>
> Earle
>
> "TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:x_idne2KKq9zUYKiU-KYvg@comcast.com...
> > I agree. Whoever this "Jeffrey Leonard" is, he/she/it obviously has no
> > rational point to make. When individuals have to use insults (and this
> troll
> > has insulted everyone that he/she/it has addressed here) it is obvious
> that
> > the troll has nothing constructive to contribute. I would suspect that
> this
> > individual has just recently figured out how to create a "bogus"
identity
> > and is having a grand old time test driving it. (I could be mistaken
and
> > this could be the troll's real identity, which would indicate that this
> > individual is not as bright as is indicated by the caliber of the
posts.)
> > Hopefully, periodic complaints to his/her/its ISP will get the account
> > removed, but, as an alternative, I, for one am kill filing this troll.
I
> > suggest that if the majority of us do this, the individual will either
go
> > away (due to lack of an audience) or at the least, retreat back into the
> > woodwork.
> >
> > "Simple" <@@plutus@shaw.ca@@> wrote in message
> > news:VDFTa.496208$3C2.13322708@news3.calgary.shaw. ca...
> > > I've seen some really nasty posts here.
> > >
> > > Nathan, Bill, Mike, and everyone else help many people in this
newsgroup
> > > hundreds of times a week. To be honest, I like reading the long
stories
> > and
> > > long threads. Please don't give any Free Speech BS for exercising
your
> > > rights. If you don't have any constructive critism, possibly bite
your
> > > toung (your your fingers), and move on to the next post. I would hate
> to
> > > see things stop being as good as they are due to a few bad eggs.
> > >
> > > For whatever it matters, you guys have helped me, and I hope and wish
> > people
> > > were more polite to those who overextend themselves by helping many
> other
> > > individuals when there is no obligation for them to do so.
> > >
> > > Keep up the good work Nathan, Bill and Mike! You guys rock!
> > >
> > > Simple
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>