Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
It's up to the competitor to protest:
http://www.fasteststreetcar.com/2004...gulations.html any.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Beautiful Bill, there you go, you got it for them.
>
> If his VIN has a P at number 7 spot, it was a factory 360.
>
> But that also says the 360 was available in a bunch of different years.
>
> Mike
http://www.fasteststreetcar.com/2004...gulations.html any.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Beautiful Bill, there you go, you got it for them.
>
> If his VIN has a P at number 7 spot, it was a factory 360.
>
> But that also says the 360 was available in a bunch of different years.
>
> Mike
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
Then you may not mind sending this '81 Civilian Jeep V8 parts list:
http://www.----------.com/81CJV8parts.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I'll be happy to do it, Bill.
>
> The magazines are seldom the right source for this sort of thing.
http://www.----------.com/81CJV8parts.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I'll be happy to do it, Bill.
>
> The magazines are seldom the right source for this sort of thing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
Then you may not mind sending this '81 Civilian Jeep V8 parts list:
http://www.----------.com/81CJV8parts.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I'll be happy to do it, Bill.
>
> The magazines are seldom the right source for this sort of thing.
http://www.----------.com/81CJV8parts.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I'll be happy to do it, Bill.
>
> The magazines are seldom the right source for this sort of thing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
Then you may not mind sending this '81 Civilian Jeep V8 parts list:
http://www.----------.com/81CJV8parts.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I'll be happy to do it, Bill.
>
> The magazines are seldom the right source for this sort of thing.
http://www.----------.com/81CJV8parts.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I'll be happy to do it, Bill.
>
> The magazines are seldom the right source for this sort of thing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
Then you may not mind sending this '81 Civilian Jeep V8 parts list:
http://www.----------.com/81CJV8parts.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I'll be happy to do it, Bill.
>
> The magazines are seldom the right source for this sort of thing.
http://www.----------.com/81CJV8parts.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I'll be happy to do it, Bill.
>
> The magazines are seldom the right source for this sort of thing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
Maybe, you should buy a Real Jeep and go racing, you know what they
say, if you can't beat 'em joint 'em.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jody Heard wrote:
>
> I agree with you 100% that the burden of proof should be on the member
> with the CJ. The problem is, the head tech has already agreed to let
> him run and I am representing the rest of the stock class racer's
> trying to prove that this set-up is illegal. Somehow it has become
> our duty. They are requiring an official document (manufacturer,
> dealer, etc.) proving it was not an option. Pretty tough, huh. Thank
> you for the help.
>
> Jody
say, if you can't beat 'em joint 'em.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jody Heard wrote:
>
> I agree with you 100% that the burden of proof should be on the member
> with the CJ. The problem is, the head tech has already agreed to let
> him run and I am representing the rest of the stock class racer's
> trying to prove that this set-up is illegal. Somehow it has become
> our duty. They are requiring an official document (manufacturer,
> dealer, etc.) proving it was not an option. Pretty tough, huh. Thank
> you for the help.
>
> Jody
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
Maybe, you should buy a Real Jeep and go racing, you know what they
say, if you can't beat 'em joint 'em.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jody Heard wrote:
>
> I agree with you 100% that the burden of proof should be on the member
> with the CJ. The problem is, the head tech has already agreed to let
> him run and I am representing the rest of the stock class racer's
> trying to prove that this set-up is illegal. Somehow it has become
> our duty. They are requiring an official document (manufacturer,
> dealer, etc.) proving it was not an option. Pretty tough, huh. Thank
> you for the help.
>
> Jody
say, if you can't beat 'em joint 'em.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jody Heard wrote:
>
> I agree with you 100% that the burden of proof should be on the member
> with the CJ. The problem is, the head tech has already agreed to let
> him run and I am representing the rest of the stock class racer's
> trying to prove that this set-up is illegal. Somehow it has become
> our duty. They are requiring an official document (manufacturer,
> dealer, etc.) proving it was not an option. Pretty tough, huh. Thank
> you for the help.
>
> Jody
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
Maybe, you should buy a Real Jeep and go racing, you know what they
say, if you can't beat 'em joint 'em.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jody Heard wrote:
>
> I agree with you 100% that the burden of proof should be on the member
> with the CJ. The problem is, the head tech has already agreed to let
> him run and I am representing the rest of the stock class racer's
> trying to prove that this set-up is illegal. Somehow it has become
> our duty. They are requiring an official document (manufacturer,
> dealer, etc.) proving it was not an option. Pretty tough, huh. Thank
> you for the help.
>
> Jody
say, if you can't beat 'em joint 'em.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jody Heard wrote:
>
> I agree with you 100% that the burden of proof should be on the member
> with the CJ. The problem is, the head tech has already agreed to let
> him run and I am representing the rest of the stock class racer's
> trying to prove that this set-up is illegal. Somehow it has become
> our duty. They are requiring an official document (manufacturer,
> dealer, etc.) proving it was not an option. Pretty tough, huh. Thank
> you for the help.
>
> Jody
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
Maybe, you should buy a Real Jeep and go racing, you know what they
say, if you can't beat 'em joint 'em.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jody Heard wrote:
>
> I agree with you 100% that the burden of proof should be on the member
> with the CJ. The problem is, the head tech has already agreed to let
> him run and I am representing the rest of the stock class racer's
> trying to prove that this set-up is illegal. Somehow it has become
> our duty. They are requiring an official document (manufacturer,
> dealer, etc.) proving it was not an option. Pretty tough, huh. Thank
> you for the help.
>
> Jody
say, if you can't beat 'em joint 'em.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jody Heard wrote:
>
> I agree with you 100% that the burden of proof should be on the member
> with the CJ. The problem is, the head tech has already agreed to let
> him run and I am representing the rest of the stock class racer's
> trying to prove that this set-up is illegal. Somehow it has become
> our duty. They are requiring an official document (manufacturer,
> dealer, etc.) proving it was not an option. Pretty tough, huh. Thank
> you for the help.
>
> Jody
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Availability of a 360 in a Jeep CJ
I have a 1980 CJ out in the back that I've had since new. It has a 304.
RB
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:109g6du34l30qdd@corp.supernews.com...
> I can't address the size of the engine, but V8s were not offered in any CJ
> from (I am pretty sure) 1979. I have an '81, and I have the facotry shop
> manual for that year, and the V8 motors are not listed in the section
> covering the CJ models. There are V8 listed, but they are not engines
> options that came withthe CJ line-up.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jody Heard" <jody_heard@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c30bda4.0405040943.2234cbd8@posting.google.co m...
> > I would appreciate any and all help anyone could provide me on this
> > subject. I am doing research for the Mud Racing organization I belong
> > to, www.swmmra.org. We have a possible member who would like to join
> > our Stock Class with a CJ-7 running a 360. Our Stock Class rules state
> > that the engine must be available for that truck, that year. I have
> > been researching this for quite some time and all of the information I
> > can come accross states that the 360 was only offered in the j-10
> > pickup and the full size Cherokee. Not in the CJ's. The individual
> > claims that he has spoken to an engineer at Chrysler and that it was a
> > dealer option in which the factory would install a 360 if the
> > dealership requested even though it was never officially listed. This
> > is similar to the COPO Camaros etc. If some one could point me to a
> > definitive, reputable source (ie. dealer, manufacturer info) I would
> > greatly appreciate it.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Jody Heard
>
>
RB
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:109g6du34l30qdd@corp.supernews.com...
> I can't address the size of the engine, but V8s were not offered in any CJ
> from (I am pretty sure) 1979. I have an '81, and I have the facotry shop
> manual for that year, and the V8 motors are not listed in the section
> covering the CJ models. There are V8 listed, but they are not engines
> options that came withthe CJ line-up.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jody Heard" <jody_heard@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c30bda4.0405040943.2234cbd8@posting.google.co m...
> > I would appreciate any and all help anyone could provide me on this
> > subject. I am doing research for the Mud Racing organization I belong
> > to, www.swmmra.org. We have a possible member who would like to join
> > our Stock Class with a CJ-7 running a 360. Our Stock Class rules state
> > that the engine must be available for that truck, that year. I have
> > been researching this for quite some time and all of the information I
> > can come accross states that the 360 was only offered in the j-10
> > pickup and the full size Cherokee. Not in the CJ's. The individual
> > claims that he has spoken to an engineer at Chrysler and that it was a
> > dealer option in which the factory would install a 360 if the
> > dealership requested even though it was never officially listed. This
> > is similar to the COPO Camaros etc. If some one could point me to a
> > definitive, reputable source (ie. dealer, manufacturer info) I would
> > greatly appreciate it.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Jody Heard
>
>
