Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   Anyone who has replied to me (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/anyone-who-has-replied-me-37533/)

Anonymous 04-29-2006 12:49 PM

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote:
>Mike,
>
>I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that cox.net
>is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
>assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
>their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
>subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
>ass" motto.
>
>One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
>tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
>of waves, to be noticed.
>
>Earle
>
>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
>> Bill isn't doing that!
>>
>> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
>> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>>
>> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
>> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Earle Horton wrote:
>> >
>> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,

>there is
>> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are

>a
>> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
>> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all

>they
>> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the

>benefit
>> > in that?
>> >
>> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
>> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is

>doing.
>> >
>> > Earle
>> >
>> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
>> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
>> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make

>my
>> > > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
>> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> > >
>> > > Dave Milne wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your

>time.
>> > Much more amusing.


People that know what they are doing have already tried all you useless
attemps to stop me. You will not succeed, but please try, it amuses me.
























































Anonymous 04-29-2006 12:49 PM

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote:
>Mike,
>
>I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that cox.net
>is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
>assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
>their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
>subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
>ass" motto.
>
>One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
>tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
>of waves, to be noticed.
>
>Earle
>
>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
>> Bill isn't doing that!
>>
>> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
>> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>>
>> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
>> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Earle Horton wrote:
>> >
>> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,

>there is
>> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are

>a
>> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
>> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all

>they
>> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the

>benefit
>> > in that?
>> >
>> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
>> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is

>doing.
>> >
>> > Earle
>> >
>> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
>> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
>> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make

>my
>> > > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
>> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> > >
>> > > Dave Milne wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your

>time.
>> > Much more amusing.


People that know what they are doing have already tried all you useless
attemps to stop me. You will not succeed, but please try, it amuses me.

























































All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.04952 seconds with 7 queries