Anyone who has replied to me
 

Don't you dumbasses know better than to reply to a troll? As long as you
feed me, I'll never go away. If you want me to leave then stop replying to
me, and I'll go away and leave this really cool group in peace. You can
trust me. Really, you can. I'll get bored and move on if you just SHUT THE
---- UP GODDAMNIT!!!!!

-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
more amusing.



"Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote in message
news:LT3ITC4T38833.9331018519@anonymous...
> Don't you dumbasses know better than to reply to a troll? As long as you
> feed me, I'll never go away. If you want me to leave then stop replying to
> me, and I'll go away and leave this really cool group in peace. You can
> trust me. Really, you can. I'll get bored and move on if you just SHUT THE
> ---- UP GODDAMNIT!!!!!
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
more amusing.



"Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote in message
news:LT3ITC4T38833.9331018519@anonymous...
> Don't you dumbasses know better than to reply to a troll? As long as you
> feed me, I'll never go away. If you want me to leave then stop replying to
> me, and I'll go away and leave this really cool group in peace. You can
> trust me. Really, you can. I'll get bored and move on if you just SHUT THE
> ---- UP GODDAMNIT!!!!!
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
more amusing.



"Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote in message
news:LT3ITC4T38833.9331018519@anonymous...
> Don't you dumbasses know better than to reply to a troll? As long as you
> feed me, I'll never go away. If you want me to leave then stop replying to
> me, and I'll go away and leave this really cool group in peace. You can
> trust me. Really, you can. I'll get bored and move on if you just SHUT THE
> ---- UP GODDAMNIT!!!!!
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

What the F!@K Bill?

You go piss in these guys cornflakes and now is all good because 'you'
can't see the results???????

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)



"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

What the F!@K Bill?

You go piss in these guys cornflakes and now is all good because 'you'
can't see the results???????

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)



"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

What the F!@K Bill?

You go piss in these guys cornflakes and now is all good because 'you'
can't see the results???????

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)



"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Bill isn't doing that!

He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
to maybe drop them. This is wrong.

He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
servers to kill the abusive remailers.

Mike

Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server, there is
> the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
> haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
> do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
> in that?
>
> On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.
>
> Earle
>
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
> > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
> Much
> > > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Bill isn't doing that!

He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
to maybe drop them. This is wrong.

He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
servers to kill the abusive remailers.

Mike

Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server, there is
> the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
> haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
> do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
> in that?
>
> On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.
>
> Earle
>
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
> > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
> Much
> > > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Bill isn't doing that!

He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
to maybe drop them. This is wrong.

He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
servers to kill the abusive remailers.

Mike

Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server, there is
> the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
> haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
> do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
> in that?
>
> On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.
>
> Earle
>
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
> > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
> Much
> > > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server, there is
the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
in that?

On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.

Earle

"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
Much
> > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server, there is
the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
in that?

On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.

Earle

"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
Much
> > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server, there is
the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
in that?

On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.

Earle

"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
Much
> > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Mike,

I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that cox.net
is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
ass" motto.

One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
of waves, to be noticed.

Earle

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
> Bill isn't doing that!
>
> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>
> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>
> Mike
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
there is
> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
a
> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
they
> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
benefit
> > in that?
> >
> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
doing.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
my
> > > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Dave Milne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
time.
> > Much
> > > > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Mike,

I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that cox.net
is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
ass" motto.

One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
of waves, to be noticed.

Earle

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
> Bill isn't doing that!
>
> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>
> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>
> Mike
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
there is
> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
a
> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
they
> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
benefit
> > in that?
> >
> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
doing.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
my
> > > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Dave Milne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
time.
> > Much
> > > > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

Mike,

I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that cox.net
is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
ass" motto.

One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
of waves, to be noticed.

Earle

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
> Bill isn't doing that!
>
> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>
> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>
> Mike
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
there is
> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
a
> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
they
> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
benefit
> > in that?
> >
> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
doing.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
my
> > > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Dave Milne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
time.
> > Much
> > > > more amusing.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote:
>Mike,
>
>I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that cox.net
>is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
>assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
>their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
>subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
>ass" motto.
>
>One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
>tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
>of waves, to be noticed.
>
>Earle
>
>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
>> Bill isn't doing that!
>>
>> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
>> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>>
>> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
>> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Earle Horton wrote:
>> >
>> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
>there is
>> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
>a
>> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
>> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
>they
>> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
>benefit
>> > in that?
>> >
>> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
>> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
>doing.
>> >
>> > Earle
>> >
>> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
>> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
>> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
>my
>> > > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
>> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> > >
>> > > Dave Milne wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
>time.
>> > Much more amusing.

People that know what they are doing have already tried all you useless
attemps to stop me. You will not succeed, but please try, it amuses me.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote:
>Mike,
>
>I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that cox.net
>is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
>assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
>their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
>subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
>ass" motto.
>
>One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
>tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
>of waves, to be noticed.
>
>Earle
>
>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
>> Bill isn't doing that!
>>
>> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
>> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>>
>> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
>> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Earle Horton wrote:
>> >
>> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
>there is
>> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
>a
>> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
>> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
>they
>> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
>benefit
>> > in that?
>> >
>> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
>> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
>doing.
>> >
>> > Earle
>> >
>> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
>> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
>> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
>my
>> > > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
>> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> > >
>> > > Dave Milne wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
>time.
>> > Much more amusing.

People that know what they are doing have already tried all you useless
attemps to stop me. You will not succeed, but please try, it amuses me.

Re: Anyone who has replied to me
 

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote:
>Mike,
>
>I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that cox.net
>is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
>assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
>their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
>subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
>ass" motto.
>
>One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
>tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
>of waves, to be noticed.
>
>Earle
>
>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
>> Bill isn't doing that!
>>
>> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
>> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>>
>> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
>> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Earle Horton wrote:
>> >
>> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
>there is
>> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
>a
>> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
>> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
>they
>> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
>benefit
>> > in that?
>> >
>> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
>> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
>doing.
>> >
>> > Earle
>> >
>> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
>> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@cox.net...
>> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
>my
>> > > server. Means COX.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
>> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> > >
>> > > Dave Milne wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
>time.
>> > Much more amusing.

People that know what they are doing have already tried all you useless
attemps to stop me. You will not succeed, but please try, it amuses me.