Anyone who has replied to me
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server, there is
the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
in that?
On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
Much
> > more amusing.
the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
in that?
On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
Much
> > more amusing.
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server, there is
the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
in that?
On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
Much
> > more amusing.
the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
in that?
On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
Much
> > more amusing.
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server, there is
the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
in that?
On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
Much
> > more amusing.
the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are a
haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all they
do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the benefit
in that?
On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is doing.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
> server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time.
Much
> > more amusing.
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> more amusing.
server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> more amusing.
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> more amusing.
server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> more amusing.
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make my
server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> more amusing.
server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your time. Much
> more amusing.
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
Mike,
I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that ***.net
is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
***" motto.
One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
of waves, to be noticed.
Earle
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
> Bill isn't doing that!
>
> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>
> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>
> Mike
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
there is
> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
a
> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
they
> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
benefit
> > in that?
> >
> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
doing.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
my
> > > server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Dave Milne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
time.
> > Much
> > > > more amusing.
I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that ***.net
is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
***" motto.
One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
of waves, to be noticed.
Earle
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
> Bill isn't doing that!
>
> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>
> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>
> Mike
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
there is
> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
a
> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
they
> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
benefit
> > in that?
> >
> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
doing.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
my
> > > server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Dave Milne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
time.
> > Much
> > > > more amusing.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
Mike,
I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that ***.net
is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
***" motto.
One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
of waves, to be noticed.
Earle
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
> Bill isn't doing that!
>
> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>
> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>
> Mike
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
there is
> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
a
> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
they
> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
benefit
> > in that?
> >
> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
doing.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
my
> > > server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Dave Milne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
time.
> > Much
> > > > more amusing.
I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that ***.net
is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
***" motto.
One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
of waves, to be noticed.
Earle
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
> Bill isn't doing that!
>
> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>
> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>
> Mike
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
there is
> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
a
> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
they
> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
benefit
> > in that?
> >
> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
doing.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
my
> > > server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Dave Milne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
time.
> > Much
> > > > more amusing.
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
Mike,
I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that ***.net
is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
***" motto.
One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
of waves, to be noticed.
Earle
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
> Bill isn't doing that!
>
> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>
> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>
> Mike
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
there is
> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
a
> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
they
> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
benefit
> > in that?
> >
> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
doing.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
my
> > > server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Dave Milne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
time.
> > Much
> > > > more amusing.
I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that ***.net
is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
***" motto.
One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
of waves, to be noticed.
Earle
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
> Bill isn't doing that!
>
> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>
> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>
> Mike
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
there is
> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
a
> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
they
> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
benefit
> > in that?
> >
> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
doing.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
my
> > > server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Dave Milne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
time.
> > Much
> > > > more amusing.
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Anyone who has replied to me
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote:
>Mike,
>
>I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that ***.net
>is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
>assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
>their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
>subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
>***" motto.
>
>One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
>tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
>of waves, to be noticed.
>
>Earle
>
>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
>> Bill isn't doing that!
>>
>> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
>> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>>
>> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
>> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Earle Horton wrote:
>> >
>> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
>there is
>> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
>a
>> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
>> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
>they
>> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
>benefit
>> > in that?
>> >
>> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
>> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
>doing.
>> >
>> > Earle
>> >
>> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
>> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
>my
>> > > server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
>> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> > >
>> > > Dave Milne wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
>time.
>> > Much more amusing.
People that know what they are doing have already tried all you useless
attemps to stop me. You will not succeed, but please try, it amuses me.
>Mike,
>
>I don't know how the Usenet power structure works, but I assume that ***.net
>is transmitting their actions, and their opinions, up the chain. I also
>assume that the backbone servers will tend to place greater importance on
>their opinion, than on Bill's. And in the last analysis, they are all
>subject to public opinion, even databasix.com with their "kicking Usenet's
>***" motto.
>
>One of the problems with this sort of thing, is that people in authority
>tend to avoid the responsibility that goes with it. You have to make a lot
>of waves, to be noticed.
>
>Earle
>
>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:4452A564.F54DFD22@sympatico.ca...
>> Bill isn't doing that!
>>
>> He is still pissing in their breakfast but is just getting 'his' server
>> to maybe drop them. This is wrong.
>>
>> He needs to look up UDP and go about it properly to get the backbone
>> servers to kill the abusive remailers.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Earle Horton wrote:
>> >
>> > Even if there is no legal incentive, to keep trash off your server,
>there is
>> > the public relations aspect of it. If decent people think, that you are
>a
>> > haven for undesirables, then no one will buy your service, except
>> > undesirables. The remailers appear to be a "public service", but all
>they
>> > do, is let losers read posts, written by other losers. Where is the
>benefit
>> > in that?
>> >
>> > On the other hand, if Bill succeeds in making databasix.com lose their
>> > Usenet feed, well that is a socially redeeming result, of what he is
>doing.
>> >
>> > Earle
>> >
>> > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> > news:4452A85A.CF658227@***.net...
>> > > Cool, "Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> didn't make
>my
>> > > server. Means ***.net is beginning to listen to me. :-)
>> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> > >
>> > > Dave Milne wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Nope, we will continue to feed you, and waste even more of your
>time.
>> > Much more amusing.
People that know what they are doing have already tried all you useless
attemps to stop me. You will not succeed, but please try, it amuses me.