I noticed you still have a 1970 Real Civilian Jeep:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/jeeps/70cj5.html I bet it still blow the
doors off your jeepette.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

 

Yeah, the phrases "strong chassis" and "Jeep" don't exactly go well together
even now.

Dave

"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20031206111254676-0900@news.newsguy.com...
> On 06 Dec 2003 09:44 AM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> > You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out
> > frame with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian
> > Jeep.
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

 

Yeah, the phrases "strong chassis" and "Jeep" don't exactly go well together
even now.

Dave

"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20031206111254676-0900@news.newsguy.com...
> On 06 Dec 2003 09:44 AM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> > You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out
> > frame with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian
> > Jeep.
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

 

Yeah, the phrases "strong chassis" and "Jeep" don't exactly go well together
even now.

Dave

"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20031206111254676-0900@news.newsguy.com...
> On 06 Dec 2003 09:44 AM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> > You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out
> > frame with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian
> > Jeep.
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

 

me thinks that the mattster is a tried and true
republican/conservative-republican. for his mind be made up before he
receiveth all the open-minded input. but this means not that I do not like
him as a fellow in the Jeep line-up of unlike but like-minded jeepers.
(viva a/m/c/ and all the real jeeps that passed before...and never to be
seen again..._
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031205163314.21232.00002546@mb-m13.aol.com...
> In article <Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52>, Lon Stowell
> <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> writes:
>
> >Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety ***** have gotten all SUV
> > manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> > of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> > shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
> >
> > As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> > of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> > longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> > shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> > it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> > lift kits on the street.
> >
>
> please don't feed the trolls...
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>

 

me thinks that the mattster is a tried and true
republican/conservative-republican. for his mind be made up before he
receiveth all the open-minded input. but this means not that I do not like
him as a fellow in the Jeep line-up of unlike but like-minded jeepers.
(viva a/m/c/ and all the real jeeps that passed before...and never to be
seen again..._
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031205163314.21232.00002546@mb-m13.aol.com...
> In article <Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52>, Lon Stowell
> <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> writes:
>
> >Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety ***** have gotten all SUV
> > manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> > of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> > shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
> >
> > As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> > of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> > longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> > shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> > it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> > lift kits on the street.
> >
>
> please don't feed the trolls...
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>

 

me thinks that the mattster is a tried and true
republican/conservative-republican. for his mind be made up before he
receiveth all the open-minded input. but this means not that I do not like
him as a fellow in the Jeep line-up of unlike but like-minded jeepers.
(viva a/m/c/ and all the real jeeps that passed before...and never to be
seen again..._
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031205163314.21232.00002546@mb-m13.aol.com...
> In article <Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52>, Lon Stowell
> <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> writes:
>
> >Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety ***** have gotten all SUV
> > manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> > of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> > shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
> >
> > As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> > of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> > longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> > shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> > it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> > lift kits on the street.
> >
>
> please don't feed the trolls...
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>

 

joan and the krysler kooks should gettalong... the new liberty with the "up
kuntry" package is much lower and is much less trail worthy than the liberty
without that doubtful add-on. (talk about duuumb) .. also, a few years
ago, kyrsler reduced the rear departure angle of AMC's grandcherokee, and
put in a smaller gas tank, because hausfraus said they wanted more room for
their groceries. dduuuuuuuuh. them stoopid ani.
"Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
news:Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52...
> At 12/5/03 07:53, attnews bespake thusly:
>
> > recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of
amc's
> > wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> > company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> > systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The
end
> > of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for
jeep's
> > future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> > NOTE: see liberty
> >
> >
>
> Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety ***** have gotten all SUV
> manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
>
> As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> lift kits on the street.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
>

 

joan and the krysler kooks should gettalong... the new liberty with the "up
kuntry" package is much lower and is much less trail worthy than the liberty
without that doubtful add-on. (talk about duuumb) .. also, a few years
ago, kyrsler reduced the rear departure angle of AMC's grandcherokee, and
put in a smaller gas tank, because hausfraus said they wanted more room for
their groceries. dduuuuuuuuh. them stoopid ani.
"Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
news:Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52...
> At 12/5/03 07:53, attnews bespake thusly:
>
> > recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of
amc's
> > wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> > company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> > systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The
end
> > of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for
jeep's
> > future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> > NOTE: see liberty
> >
> >
>
> Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety ***** have gotten all SUV
> manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
>
> As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> lift kits on the street.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
>

 

joan and the krysler kooks should gettalong... the new liberty with the "up
kuntry" package is much lower and is much less trail worthy than the liberty
without that doubtful add-on. (talk about duuumb) .. also, a few years
ago, kyrsler reduced the rear departure angle of AMC's grandcherokee, and
put in a smaller gas tank, because hausfraus said they wanted more room for
their groceries. dduuuuuuuuh. them stoopid ani.
"Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
news:Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52...
> At 12/5/03 07:53, attnews bespake thusly:
>
> > recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of
amc's
> > wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> > company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> > systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The
end
> > of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for
jeep's
> > future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> > NOTE: see liberty
> >
> >
>
> Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety ***** have gotten all SUV
> manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
>
> As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> lift kits on the street.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
>