AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
NOTE: see liberty

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

At 12/5/03 07:53, attnews bespake thusly:

> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> NOTE: see liberty
>
>

Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.

As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
lift kits on the street.

--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

At 12/5/03 07:53, attnews bespake thusly:

> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> NOTE: see liberty
>
>

Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.

As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
lift kits on the street.

--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

At 12/5/03 07:53, attnews bespake thusly:

> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> NOTE: see liberty
>
>

Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.

As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
lift kits on the street.

--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

So what else is new? They haven't made a Real Jeep in over thirty
years.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

attnews wrote:
>
> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> NOTE: see liberty

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

So what else is new? They haven't made a Real Jeep in over thirty
years.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

attnews wrote:
>
> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> NOTE: see liberty

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

So what else is new? They haven't made a Real Jeep in over thirty
years.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

attnews wrote:
>
> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> NOTE: see liberty

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

In article <Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52>, Lon Stowell
<LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> writes:

>Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
> manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
>
> As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> lift kits on the street.
>

please don't feed the trolls...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

In article <Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52>, Lon Stowell
<LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> writes:

>Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
> manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
>
> As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> lift kits on the street.
>

please don't feed the trolls...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

In article <Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52>, Lon Stowell
<LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> writes:

>Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
> manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
>
> As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> lift kits on the street.
>

please don't feed the trolls...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
=)

Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:22:35 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> So what else is new? They haven't made a Real Jeep in over thirty
>years.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>attnews wrote:
>>
>> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
>> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
>> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
>> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
>> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
>> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
>> NOTE: see liberty

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
=)

Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:22:35 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> So what else is new? They haven't made a Real Jeep in over thirty
>years.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>attnews wrote:
>>
>> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
>> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
>> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
>> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
>> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
>> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
>> NOTE: see liberty

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
=)

Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:22:35 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> So what else is new? They haven't made a Real Jeep in over thirty
>years.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>attnews wrote:
>>
>> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
>> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
>> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
>> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
>> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
>> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
>> NOTE: see liberty

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

David C. Moller wrote:
> Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
> =)

It's alright though they starting making the improved ones after they
stopped making the real ones.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

David C. Moller wrote:
> Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
> =)

It's alright though they starting making the improved ones after they
stopped making the real ones.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

David C. Moller wrote:
> Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
> =)

It's alright though they starting making the improved ones after they
stopped making the real ones.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

i agree. the real ones were great. the amc's were sensible
evolvments....the krysler stuff is non-jeep in concept and spells the end of
the real- jeep line.... viva the real jeeps, and viva amc.....still alive
and well in the wrangler, except for the goofy dash and round headlites and
crappy rear bumper and cheapy door panels and lack of grease fittings for
u-joints and ...and...and....
"Simon Juncal" <sjuncal@erols.com> wrote in message
news:3FD1A6C5.7080502@erols.com...
>
>
> David C. Moller wrote:
> > Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
> > =)
>
> It's alright though they starting making the improved ones after they
> stopped making the real ones.
>

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

i agree. the real ones were great. the amc's were sensible
evolvments....the krysler stuff is non-jeep in concept and spells the end of
the real- jeep line.... viva the real jeeps, and viva amc.....still alive
and well in the wrangler, except for the goofy dash and round headlites and
crappy rear bumper and cheapy door panels and lack of grease fittings for
u-joints and ...and...and....
"Simon Juncal" <sjuncal@erols.com> wrote in message
news:3FD1A6C5.7080502@erols.com...
>
>
> David C. Moller wrote:
> > Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
> > =)
>
> It's alright though they starting making the improved ones after they
> stopped making the real ones.
>

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

i agree. the real ones were great. the amc's were sensible
evolvments....the krysler stuff is non-jeep in concept and spells the end of
the real- jeep line.... viva the real jeeps, and viva amc.....still alive
and well in the wrangler, except for the goofy dash and round headlites and
crappy rear bumper and cheapy door panels and lack of grease fittings for
u-joints and ...and...and....
"Simon Juncal" <sjuncal@erols.com> wrote in message
news:3FD1A6C5.7080502@erols.com...
>
>
> David C. Moller wrote:
> > Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
> > =)
>
> It's alright though they starting making the improved ones after they
> stopped making the real ones.
>

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

Yeah, my `79 CJ-5 is just a Fake Jeep, rattles, leaks and all.

Come to think of it, it prolly is. I didn't do a restoration so much as
an amazingly life-like re-creation.


On or about Sat, 6 Dec 2003, David C. Moller of dmoller@verizon.net wrote:

> Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
> =)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
>
> On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:22:35 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > So what else is new? They haven't made a Real Jeep in over thirty
> >years.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >attnews wrote:
> >>
> >> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
> >> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> >> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> >> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
> >> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
> >> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> >> NOTE: see liberty
>
>

--
"doing whatever it took to capture world marketing shares, even as far
as having multiple satellites circling the globe to ensure complete
coverage and maximum profit potential."

Tealady spills the beans on AFU's new business plan.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

Yeah, my `79 CJ-5 is just a Fake Jeep, rattles, leaks and all.

Come to think of it, it prolly is. I didn't do a restoration so much as
an amazingly life-like re-creation.


On or about Sat, 6 Dec 2003, David C. Moller of dmoller@verizon.net wrote:

> Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
> =)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
>
> On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:22:35 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > So what else is new? They haven't made a Real Jeep in over thirty
> >years.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >attnews wrote:
> >>
> >> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
> >> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> >> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> >> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
> >> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
> >> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> >> NOTE: see liberty
>
>

--
"doing whatever it took to capture world marketing shares, even as far
as having multiple satellites circling the globe to ensure complete
coverage and maximum profit potential."

Tealady spills the beans on AFU's new business plan.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

Yeah, my `79 CJ-5 is just a Fake Jeep, rattles, leaks and all.

Come to think of it, it prolly is. I didn't do a restoration so much as
an amazingly life-like re-creation.


On or about Sat, 6 Dec 2003, David C. Moller of dmoller@verizon.net wrote:

> Over 30 years? Holy ----, the last Real Jeep was made prior to 1973?
> =)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
>
> On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:22:35 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > So what else is new? They haven't made a Real Jeep in over thirty
> >years.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >attnews wrote:
> >>
> >> recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of amc's
> >> wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> >> company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> >> systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The end
> >> of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for jeep's
> >> future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> >> NOTE: see liberty
>
>

--
"doing whatever it took to capture world marketing shares, even as far
as having multiple satellites circling the globe to ensure complete
coverage and maximum profit potential."

Tealady spills the beans on AFU's new business plan.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out frame
with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian Jeep.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Lee Ayrton wrote:
>
> Yeah, my `79 CJ-5 is just a Fake Jeep, rattles, leaks and all.
>
> Come to think of it, it prolly is. I didn't do a restoration so much as
> an amazingly life-like re-creation.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out frame
with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian Jeep.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Lee Ayrton wrote:
>
> Yeah, my `79 CJ-5 is just a Fake Jeep, rattles, leaks and all.
>
> Come to think of it, it prolly is. I didn't do a restoration so much as
> an amazingly life-like re-creation.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out frame
with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian Jeep.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Lee Ayrton wrote:
>
> Yeah, my `79 CJ-5 is just a Fake Jeep, rattles, leaks and all.
>
> Come to think of it, it prolly is. I didn't do a restoration so much as
> an amazingly life-like re-creation.

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

On 06 Dec 2003 09:44 AM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out
> frame with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian
> Jeep.

You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
straight 6, right?

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

On 06 Dec 2003 09:44 AM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out
> frame with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian
> Jeep.

You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
straight 6, right?

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

On 06 Dec 2003 09:44 AM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out
> frame with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian
> Jeep.

You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
straight 6, right?

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

I noticed you still have a 1970 Real Civilian Jeep:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/jeeps/70cj5.html I bet it still blow the
doors off your jeepette.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

I noticed you still have a 1970 Real Civilian Jeep:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/jeeps/70cj5.html I bet it still blow the
doors off your jeepette.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

I noticed you still have a 1970 Real Civilian Jeep:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/jeeps/70cj5.html I bet it still blow the
doors off your jeepette.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

Yeah, the phrases "strong chassis" and "Jeep" don't exactly go well together
even now.

Dave

"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20031206111254676-0900@news.newsguy.com...
> On 06 Dec 2003 09:44 AM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> > You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out
> > frame with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian
> > Jeep.
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

Yeah, the phrases "strong chassis" and "Jeep" don't exactly go well together
even now.

Dave

"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20031206111254676-0900@news.newsguy.com...
> On 06 Dec 2003 09:44 AM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> > You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out
> > frame with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian
> > Jeep.
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

Yeah, the phrases "strong chassis" and "Jeep" don't exactly go well together
even now.

Dave

"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20031206111254676-0900@news.newsguy.com...
> On 06 Dec 2003 09:44 AM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> > You could make yours a Real Jeep by replacing your rusted out
> > frame with the thicker truck like channel frame used in a '72 Civilian
> > Jeep.
>
> You mean the ones that broke frequently when they switched to the
> straight 6, right?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

me thinks that the mattster is a tried and true
republican/conservative-republican. for his mind be made up before he
receiveth all the open-minded input. but this means not that I do not like
him as a fellow in the Jeep line-up of unlike but like-minded jeepers.
(viva a/m/c/ and all the real jeeps that passed before...and never to be
seen again..._
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031205163314.21232.00002546@mb-m13.aol.com...
> In article <Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52>, Lon Stowell
> <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> writes:
>
> >Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
> > manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> > of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> > shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
> >
> > As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> > of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> > longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> > shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> > it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> > lift kits on the street.
> >
>
> please don't feed the trolls...
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

me thinks that the mattster is a tried and true
republican/conservative-republican. for his mind be made up before he
receiveth all the open-minded input. but this means not that I do not like
him as a fellow in the Jeep line-up of unlike but like-minded jeepers.
(viva a/m/c/ and all the real jeeps that passed before...and never to be
seen again..._
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031205163314.21232.00002546@mb-m13.aol.com...
> In article <Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52>, Lon Stowell
> <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> writes:
>
> >Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
> > manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> > of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> > shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
> >
> > As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> > of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> > longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> > shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> > it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> > lift kits on the street.
> >
>
> please don't feed the trolls...
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

me thinks that the mattster is a tried and true
republican/conservative-republican. for his mind be made up before he
receiveth all the open-minded input. but this means not that I do not like
him as a fellow in the Jeep line-up of unlike but like-minded jeepers.
(viva a/m/c/ and all the real jeeps that passed before...and never to be
seen again..._
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031205163314.21232.00002546@mb-m13.aol.com...
> In article <Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52>, Lon Stowell
> <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> writes:
>
> >Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
> > manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> > of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> > shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
> >
> > As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> > of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> > longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> > shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> > it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> > lift kits on the street.
> >
>
> please don't feed the trolls...
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

joan and the krysler kooks should gettalong... the new liberty with the "up
kuntry" package is much lower and is much less trail worthy than the liberty
without that doubtful add-on. (talk about duuumb) .. also, a few years
ago, kyrsler reduced the rear departure angle of AMC's grandcherokee, and
put in a smaller gas tank, because hausfraus said they wanted more room for
their groceries. dduuuuuuuuh. them stoopid ani.
"Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
news:Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52...
> At 12/5/03 07:53, attnews bespake thusly:
>
> > recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of
amc's
> > wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> > company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> > systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The
end
> > of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for
jeep's
> > future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> > NOTE: see liberty
> >
> >
>
> Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
> manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
>
> As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> lift kits on the street.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
>

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

joan and the krysler kooks should gettalong... the new liberty with the "up
kuntry" package is much lower and is much less trail worthy than the liberty
without that doubtful add-on. (talk about duuumb) .. also, a few years
ago, kyrsler reduced the rear departure angle of AMC's grandcherokee, and
put in a smaller gas tank, because hausfraus said they wanted more room for
their groceries. dduuuuuuuuh. them stoopid ani.
"Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
news:Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52...
> At 12/5/03 07:53, attnews bespake thusly:
>
> > recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of
amc's
> > wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> > company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> > systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The
end
> > of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for
jeep's
> > future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> > NOTE: see liberty
> >
> >
>
> Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
> manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
>
> As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> lift kits on the street.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
>

Re: AMC still rescuing Krysler??
 

joan and the krysler kooks should gettalong... the new liberty with the "up
kuntry" package is much lower and is much less trail worthy than the liberty
without that doubtful add-on. (talk about duuumb) .. also, a few years
ago, kyrsler reduced the rear departure angle of AMC's grandcherokee, and
put in a smaller gas tank, because hausfraus said they wanted more room for
their groceries. dduuuuuuuuh. them stoopid ani.
"Lon Stowell" <LonDot.Stowell@ComcastPeriod.Net> wrote in message
news:Kn3Ab.308375$9E1.1550505@attbi_s52...
> At 12/5/03 07:53, attnews bespake thusly:
>
> > recent vehicle sales reports shows chrysler admitting that sales of
amc's
> > wrangler are responsible for the pitiful sales gains reported by that
> > company. they shouldda kept the entire amc jeep line instead of
> > systematically destroying it with their dumb and crude make-overs....The
end
> > of the Jeep heritage is at hand. Have you seen krysler's ideas for
jeep's
> > future? Hold on to the old ones. There won't be any more.. (sigh)
> > NOTE: see liberty
> >
> >
>
> Ahhh, but now Joan Claybrook's safety nazis have gotten all SUV
> manufacturers [except Porsche] to agree to lower the front ends
> of all SUV's to avoid being able to drive right over that little
> shitbox that just pulled right out in front of you without looking.
>
> As of approximately 2007 thru 2009, unless the SUV has some sort
> of ride height control that can increase drive height, it will no
> longer be possible to drive over the crunched carcass of that
> shitbox without using a winch. I wouldn't care to bet how long
> it will take before Ms. Claybrook and Mr. Ditlow manage to outlaw
> lift kits on the street.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
>