Airbox has to go?
06-15-2005, 04:57 PM
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I live
> and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you do,
> either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you do
> use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
>
> Earle
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I live
> and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you do,
> either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you do
> use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
>
> Earle
06-15-2005, 04:57 PM
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I live
> and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you do,
> either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you do
> use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
>
> Earle
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I live
> and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you do,
> either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you do
> use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
>
> Earle
06-15-2005, 04:57 PM
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I live
> and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you do,
> either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you do
> use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
>
> Earle
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I live
> and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you do,
> either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you do
> use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
>
> Earle
06-15-2005, 07:46 PM
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
This article says things for and against the K&N.
"After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed
7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N "plugged up" nearly 3 times faster,
passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
However,
"The other filters, most notably the oiled reusable types, had an
exponential loading response before reaching maximum restriction. These
filters had a lower initial restriction, but they became exponentially more
restrictive under a constant flow of dirt."
I like that "exponential loading response". The Rock-It Air Tube places the
K&N in a location, over the valve cover, where there seems to be less dust
than the stock air box location on my '95 YJ. If the filter is kept
relatively clean, like mine is, it stays on the flat part of the exponential
"Dust Loading Curve", passes more air than an equivalent paper filter would,
and doesn't have to worry about the dust so much because of the location.
"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt
and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest
relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had
less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between
optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
Everything in life is a trade-off. Still, I maintain that there is no
(visible) dust in the pipe, and if I don't see it it won't hurt me. Now if
I were operating the vehicle "bei starkem Dustfall" like you do yours, I
would doubtless be more concerned with passing the absolute smallest amount
of dirt. If you wanted the "best" filter in all respects, you would
engineer a huge paper filter to pass a lot of air and a small amount of
dirt, but put it in a baffle that removed the big pieces by centrifugal
force. (Lots of stock setups do this.)
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42B09633.2A703BED@***.net...
> http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I
live
> > and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you
do,
> > either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you
do
> > use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
> >
> > Earle
"After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed
7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N "plugged up" nearly 3 times faster,
passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
However,
"The other filters, most notably the oiled reusable types, had an
exponential loading response before reaching maximum restriction. These
filters had a lower initial restriction, but they became exponentially more
restrictive under a constant flow of dirt."
I like that "exponential loading response". The Rock-It Air Tube places the
K&N in a location, over the valve cover, where there seems to be less dust
than the stock air box location on my '95 YJ. If the filter is kept
relatively clean, like mine is, it stays on the flat part of the exponential
"Dust Loading Curve", passes more air than an equivalent paper filter would,
and doesn't have to worry about the dust so much because of the location.
"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt
and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest
relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had
less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between
optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
Everything in life is a trade-off. Still, I maintain that there is no
(visible) dust in the pipe, and if I don't see it it won't hurt me. Now if
I were operating the vehicle "bei starkem Dustfall" like you do yours, I
would doubtless be more concerned with passing the absolute smallest amount
of dirt. If you wanted the "best" filter in all respects, you would
engineer a huge paper filter to pass a lot of air and a small amount of
dirt, but put it in a baffle that removed the big pieces by centrifugal
force. (Lots of stock setups do this.)
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42B09633.2A703BED@***.net...
> http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I
live
> > and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you
do,
> > either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you
do
> > use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
> >
> > Earle
06-15-2005, 07:46 PM
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
This article says things for and against the K&N.
"After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed
7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N "plugged up" nearly 3 times faster,
passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
However,
"The other filters, most notably the oiled reusable types, had an
exponential loading response before reaching maximum restriction. These
filters had a lower initial restriction, but they became exponentially more
restrictive under a constant flow of dirt."
I like that "exponential loading response". The Rock-It Air Tube places the
K&N in a location, over the valve cover, where there seems to be less dust
than the stock air box location on my '95 YJ. If the filter is kept
relatively clean, like mine is, it stays on the flat part of the exponential
"Dust Loading Curve", passes more air than an equivalent paper filter would,
and doesn't have to worry about the dust so much because of the location.
"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt
and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest
relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had
less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between
optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
Everything in life is a trade-off. Still, I maintain that there is no
(visible) dust in the pipe, and if I don't see it it won't hurt me. Now if
I were operating the vehicle "bei starkem Dustfall" like you do yours, I
would doubtless be more concerned with passing the absolute smallest amount
of dirt. If you wanted the "best" filter in all respects, you would
engineer a huge paper filter to pass a lot of air and a small amount of
dirt, but put it in a baffle that removed the big pieces by centrifugal
force. (Lots of stock setups do this.)
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42B09633.2A703BED@***.net...
> http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I
live
> > and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you
do,
> > either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you
do
> > use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
> >
> > Earle
"After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed
7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N "plugged up" nearly 3 times faster,
passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
However,
"The other filters, most notably the oiled reusable types, had an
exponential loading response before reaching maximum restriction. These
filters had a lower initial restriction, but they became exponentially more
restrictive under a constant flow of dirt."
I like that "exponential loading response". The Rock-It Air Tube places the
K&N in a location, over the valve cover, where there seems to be less dust
than the stock air box location on my '95 YJ. If the filter is kept
relatively clean, like mine is, it stays on the flat part of the exponential
"Dust Loading Curve", passes more air than an equivalent paper filter would,
and doesn't have to worry about the dust so much because of the location.
"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt
and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest
relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had
less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between
optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
Everything in life is a trade-off. Still, I maintain that there is no
(visible) dust in the pipe, and if I don't see it it won't hurt me. Now if
I were operating the vehicle "bei starkem Dustfall" like you do yours, I
would doubtless be more concerned with passing the absolute smallest amount
of dirt. If you wanted the "best" filter in all respects, you would
engineer a huge paper filter to pass a lot of air and a small amount of
dirt, but put it in a baffle that removed the big pieces by centrifugal
force. (Lots of stock setups do this.)
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42B09633.2A703BED@***.net...
> http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I
live
> > and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you
do,
> > either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you
do
> > use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
> >
> > Earle
06-15-2005, 07:46 PM
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
This article says things for and against the K&N.
"After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed
7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N "plugged up" nearly 3 times faster,
passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
However,
"The other filters, most notably the oiled reusable types, had an
exponential loading response before reaching maximum restriction. These
filters had a lower initial restriction, but they became exponentially more
restrictive under a constant flow of dirt."
I like that "exponential loading response". The Rock-It Air Tube places the
K&N in a location, over the valve cover, where there seems to be less dust
than the stock air box location on my '95 YJ. If the filter is kept
relatively clean, like mine is, it stays on the flat part of the exponential
"Dust Loading Curve", passes more air than an equivalent paper filter would,
and doesn't have to worry about the dust so much because of the location.
"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt
and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest
relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had
less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between
optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
Everything in life is a trade-off. Still, I maintain that there is no
(visible) dust in the pipe, and if I don't see it it won't hurt me. Now if
I were operating the vehicle "bei starkem Dustfall" like you do yours, I
would doubtless be more concerned with passing the absolute smallest amount
of dirt. If you wanted the "best" filter in all respects, you would
engineer a huge paper filter to pass a lot of air and a small amount of
dirt, but put it in a baffle that removed the big pieces by centrifugal
force. (Lots of stock setups do this.)
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42B09633.2A703BED@***.net...
> http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I
live
> > and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you
do,
> > either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you
do
> > use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
> >
> > Earle
"After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed
7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N "plugged up" nearly 3 times faster,
passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
However,
"The other filters, most notably the oiled reusable types, had an
exponential loading response before reaching maximum restriction. These
filters had a lower initial restriction, but they became exponentially more
restrictive under a constant flow of dirt."
I like that "exponential loading response". The Rock-It Air Tube places the
K&N in a location, over the valve cover, where there seems to be less dust
than the stock air box location on my '95 YJ. If the filter is kept
relatively clean, like mine is, it stays on the flat part of the exponential
"Dust Loading Curve", passes more air than an equivalent paper filter would,
and doesn't have to worry about the dust so much because of the location.
"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt
and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest
relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had
less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between
optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
Everything in life is a trade-off. Still, I maintain that there is no
(visible) dust in the pipe, and if I don't see it it won't hurt me. Now if
I were operating the vehicle "bei starkem Dustfall" like you do yours, I
would doubtless be more concerned with passing the absolute smallest amount
of dirt. If you wanted the "best" filter in all respects, you would
engineer a huge paper filter to pass a lot of air and a small amount of
dirt, but put it in a baffle that removed the big pieces by centrifugal
force. (Lots of stock setups do this.)
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42B09633.2A703BED@***.net...
> http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I
live
> > and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you
do,
> > either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you
do
> > use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
> >
> > Earle
06-15-2005, 07:46 PM
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
This article says things for and against the K&N.
"After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed
7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N "plugged up" nearly 3 times faster,
passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
However,
"The other filters, most notably the oiled reusable types, had an
exponential loading response before reaching maximum restriction. These
filters had a lower initial restriction, but they became exponentially more
restrictive under a constant flow of dirt."
I like that "exponential loading response". The Rock-It Air Tube places the
K&N in a location, over the valve cover, where there seems to be less dust
than the stock air box location on my '95 YJ. If the filter is kept
relatively clean, like mine is, it stays on the flat part of the exponential
"Dust Loading Curve", passes more air than an equivalent paper filter would,
and doesn't have to worry about the dust so much because of the location.
"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt
and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest
relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had
less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between
optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
Everything in life is a trade-off. Still, I maintain that there is no
(visible) dust in the pipe, and if I don't see it it won't hurt me. Now if
I were operating the vehicle "bei starkem Dustfall" like you do yours, I
would doubtless be more concerned with passing the absolute smallest amount
of dirt. If you wanted the "best" filter in all respects, you would
engineer a huge paper filter to pass a lot of air and a small amount of
dirt, but put it in a baffle that removed the big pieces by centrifugal
force. (Lots of stock setups do this.)
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42B09633.2A703BED@***.net...
> http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I
live
> > and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you
do,
> > either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you
do
> > use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
> >
> > Earle
"After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed
7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N "plugged up" nearly 3 times faster,
passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
However,
"The other filters, most notably the oiled reusable types, had an
exponential loading response before reaching maximum restriction. These
filters had a lower initial restriction, but they became exponentially more
restrictive under a constant flow of dirt."
I like that "exponential loading response". The Rock-It Air Tube places the
K&N in a location, over the valve cover, where there seems to be less dust
than the stock air box location on my '95 YJ. If the filter is kept
relatively clean, like mine is, it stays on the flat part of the exponential
"Dust Loading Curve", passes more air than an equivalent paper filter would,
and doesn't have to worry about the dust so much because of the location.
"However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt
and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest
relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had
less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between
optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
Everything in life is a trade-off. Still, I maintain that there is no
(visible) dust in the pipe, and if I don't see it it won't hurt me. Now if
I were operating the vehicle "bei starkem Dustfall" like you do yours, I
would doubtless be more concerned with passing the absolute smallest amount
of dirt. If you wanted the "best" filter in all respects, you would
engineer a huge paper filter to pass a lot of air and a small amount of
dirt, but put it in a baffle that removed the big pieces by centrifugal
force. (Lots of stock setups do this.)
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42B09633.2A703BED@***.net...
> http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You do raise a point, but I am not getting any dust in the pipe where I
live
> > and play. I don't have enough horsepower to throw dust as high as you
do,
> > either. Results will depend on usage and individual situation. If you
do
> > use a K&N, clean and oil it as needed.
> >
> > Earle
06-15-2005, 08:06 PM
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
Yea Bill, I hate to mess up the original air intake system. It's not a real
Jeep so it doesn't fit under any seat, I tried, believe me. I can't take
out the back seat because I have a lot of Jeep crazed young grandkids.
I guess what I'll do is put it in a box and use good clips to attach to the
battery(s), like a portable. I swear I saw a set-up on a TJ that was from a
2xxx something auto that fit. Of course, the air scrubbing wouldn't be as
good as now. Thanks
Andy
2001 TJ
Too many mods to remember
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42AF5627.3FC9B58A@***.net...
> What wrong with under the seat?
> http://www.ok4wd.com/product.asp?id=172 I'd do a lot of looking before I
> screwed up a perfect induction system.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Andy wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I got a great deal on a Quick Air 3 and attempted to install it and gave
>> up.
>> I have an 01 TJ six cyl. and the air box has to go if I want to put this
>> in
>> the engine compartment, and I do.. I'm really not interested in K&N or
>> other devices. I have seen nice setups with a chrome air cleaner on top
>> of
>> the intake. Anybody know what air cleaner and filter I could use? Off
>> of a
>> certain vehicle? I off road a lot so ingestion dust/dirt is something I
>> am
>> concerned about.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Andy
>> 2001 TJ
Jeep so it doesn't fit under any seat, I tried, believe me. I can't take
out the back seat because I have a lot of Jeep crazed young grandkids.
I guess what I'll do is put it in a box and use good clips to attach to the
battery(s), like a portable. I swear I saw a set-up on a TJ that was from a
2xxx something auto that fit. Of course, the air scrubbing wouldn't be as
good as now. Thanks
Andy
2001 TJ
Too many mods to remember
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42AF5627.3FC9B58A@***.net...
> What wrong with under the seat?
> http://www.ok4wd.com/product.asp?id=172 I'd do a lot of looking before I
> screwed up a perfect induction system.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Andy wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I got a great deal on a Quick Air 3 and attempted to install it and gave
>> up.
>> I have an 01 TJ six cyl. and the air box has to go if I want to put this
>> in
>> the engine compartment, and I do.. I'm really not interested in K&N or
>> other devices. I have seen nice setups with a chrome air cleaner on top
>> of
>> the intake. Anybody know what air cleaner and filter I could use? Off
>> of a
>> certain vehicle? I off road a lot so ingestion dust/dirt is something I
>> am
>> concerned about.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Andy
>> 2001 TJ
06-15-2005, 08:06 PM
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
Yea Bill, I hate to mess up the original air intake system. It's not a real
Jeep so it doesn't fit under any seat, I tried, believe me. I can't take
out the back seat because I have a lot of Jeep crazed young grandkids.
I guess what I'll do is put it in a box and use good clips to attach to the
battery(s), like a portable. I swear I saw a set-up on a TJ that was from a
2xxx something auto that fit. Of course, the air scrubbing wouldn't be as
good as now. Thanks
Andy
2001 TJ
Too many mods to remember
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42AF5627.3FC9B58A@***.net...
> What wrong with under the seat?
> http://www.ok4wd.com/product.asp?id=172 I'd do a lot of looking before I
> screwed up a perfect induction system.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Andy wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I got a great deal on a Quick Air 3 and attempted to install it and gave
>> up.
>> I have an 01 TJ six cyl. and the air box has to go if I want to put this
>> in
>> the engine compartment, and I do.. I'm really not interested in K&N or
>> other devices. I have seen nice setups with a chrome air cleaner on top
>> of
>> the intake. Anybody know what air cleaner and filter I could use? Off
>> of a
>> certain vehicle? I off road a lot so ingestion dust/dirt is something I
>> am
>> concerned about.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Andy
>> 2001 TJ
Jeep so it doesn't fit under any seat, I tried, believe me. I can't take
out the back seat because I have a lot of Jeep crazed young grandkids.
I guess what I'll do is put it in a box and use good clips to attach to the
battery(s), like a portable. I swear I saw a set-up on a TJ that was from a
2xxx something auto that fit. Of course, the air scrubbing wouldn't be as
good as now. Thanks
Andy
2001 TJ
Too many mods to remember
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42AF5627.3FC9B58A@***.net...
> What wrong with under the seat?
> http://www.ok4wd.com/product.asp?id=172 I'd do a lot of looking before I
> screwed up a perfect induction system.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Andy wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I got a great deal on a Quick Air 3 and attempted to install it and gave
>> up.
>> I have an 01 TJ six cyl. and the air box has to go if I want to put this
>> in
>> the engine compartment, and I do.. I'm really not interested in K&N or
>> other devices. I have seen nice setups with a chrome air cleaner on top
>> of
>> the intake. Anybody know what air cleaner and filter I could use? Off
>> of a
>> certain vehicle? I off road a lot so ingestion dust/dirt is something I
>> am
>> concerned about.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Andy
>> 2001 TJ
06-15-2005, 08:06 PM
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Airbox has to go?
Yea Bill, I hate to mess up the original air intake system. It's not a real
Jeep so it doesn't fit under any seat, I tried, believe me. I can't take
out the back seat because I have a lot of Jeep crazed young grandkids.
I guess what I'll do is put it in a box and use good clips to attach to the
battery(s), like a portable. I swear I saw a set-up on a TJ that was from a
2xxx something auto that fit. Of course, the air scrubbing wouldn't be as
good as now. Thanks
Andy
2001 TJ
Too many mods to remember
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42AF5627.3FC9B58A@***.net...
> What wrong with under the seat?
> http://www.ok4wd.com/product.asp?id=172 I'd do a lot of looking before I
> screwed up a perfect induction system.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Andy wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I got a great deal on a Quick Air 3 and attempted to install it and gave
>> up.
>> I have an 01 TJ six cyl. and the air box has to go if I want to put this
>> in
>> the engine compartment, and I do.. I'm really not interested in K&N or
>> other devices. I have seen nice setups with a chrome air cleaner on top
>> of
>> the intake. Anybody know what air cleaner and filter I could use? Off
>> of a
>> certain vehicle? I off road a lot so ingestion dust/dirt is something I
>> am
>> concerned about.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Andy
>> 2001 TJ
Jeep so it doesn't fit under any seat, I tried, believe me. I can't take
out the back seat because I have a lot of Jeep crazed young grandkids.
I guess what I'll do is put it in a box and use good clips to attach to the
battery(s), like a portable. I swear I saw a set-up on a TJ that was from a
2xxx something auto that fit. Of course, the air scrubbing wouldn't be as
good as now. Thanks
Andy
2001 TJ
Too many mods to remember
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42AF5627.3FC9B58A@***.net...
> What wrong with under the seat?
> http://www.ok4wd.com/product.asp?id=172 I'd do a lot of looking before I
> screwed up a perfect induction system.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Andy wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I got a great deal on a Quick Air 3 and attempted to install it and gave
>> up.
>> I have an 01 TJ six cyl. and the air box has to go if I want to put this
>> in
>> the engine compartment, and I do.. I'm really not interested in K&N or
>> other devices. I have seen nice setups with a chrome air cleaner on top
>> of
>> the intake. Anybody know what air cleaner and filter I could use? Off
>> of a
>> certain vehicle? I off road a lot so ingestion dust/dirt is something I
>> am
>> concerned about.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Andy
>> 2001 TJ
