Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
#91
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>correct gearing.
Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
looked under hood.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>correct gearing.
Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
looked under hood.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>correct gearing.
Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
looked under hood.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>correct gearing.
Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
looked under hood.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>correct gearing.
Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
looked under hood.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>correct gearing.
Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
looked under hood.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
#94
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road. It
will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
general wheeling, it does just fine.
Carl
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:eb38d315p0v94vdbu1spb43bd4dc4co938@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>
>>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>>correct gearing.
>
>
> Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
> IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
> well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
> power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
> had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
> surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
> looked under hood.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
general wheeling, it does just fine.
Carl
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:eb38d315p0v94vdbu1spb43bd4dc4co938@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>
>>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>>correct gearing.
>
>
> Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
> IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
> well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
> power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
> had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
> surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
> looked under hood.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
#95
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road. It
will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
general wheeling, it does just fine.
Carl
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:eb38d315p0v94vdbu1spb43bd4dc4co938@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>
>>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>>correct gearing.
>
>
> Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
> IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
> well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
> power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
> had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
> surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
> looked under hood.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
general wheeling, it does just fine.
Carl
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:eb38d315p0v94vdbu1spb43bd4dc4co938@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>
>>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>>correct gearing.
>
>
> Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
> IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
> well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
> power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
> had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
> surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
> looked under hood.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road. It
will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
general wheeling, it does just fine.
Carl
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:eb38d315p0v94vdbu1spb43bd4dc4co938@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>
>>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>>correct gearing.
>
>
> Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
> IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
> well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
> power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
> had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
> surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
> looked under hood.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
general wheeling, it does just fine.
Carl
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:eb38d315p0v94vdbu1spb43bd4dc4co938@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>
>>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>>correct gearing.
>
>
> Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
> IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
> well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
> power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
> had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
> surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
> looked under hood.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
#97
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road. It
will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
general wheeling, it does just fine.
Carl
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:eb38d315p0v94vdbu1spb43bd4dc4co938@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>
>>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>>correct gearing.
>
>
> Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
> IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
> well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
> power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
> had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
> surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
> looked under hood.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
general wheeling, it does just fine.
Carl
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:eb38d315p0v94vdbu1spb43bd4dc4co938@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:21:40 -0500, c <c@me.org> wrote:
>
>>I could be wrong, but I am going to cry poser at that Jeep. First of
>>all, if I took on a project like that, I would not do it with a 4cyl
>>Jeep. They are a bit low on power as it is, and the power it takes just
>>to turn the extra weight of the tires would make it worse, even with
>>correct gearing.
>
>
> Actually it could work better than you think off road with a 4 banger
> IF it had like 6.14 gears in it with those tires. It would never do
> well at a high speed cruise (not because of RPM but because of drag vs
> power availible but it would play fairly well off road. at times. I
> had a freind that had a 4 banger with 35's and 5.13's and it did
> surprizing well off road and surprized more than one person that
> looked under hood.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
#98
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
It's easy to tell those that have never driven a Jeep with anything
larger than a four bagger: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
"Carl S" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:QbidnVz9LpEbVEnbnZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road.
It
> will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
> general wheeling, it does just fine.
>
> Carl
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
larger than a four bagger: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
"Carl S" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:QbidnVz9LpEbVEnbnZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road.
It
> will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
> general wheeling, it does just fine.
>
> Carl
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
#99
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
It's easy to tell those that have never driven a Jeep with anything
larger than a four bagger: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
"Carl S" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:QbidnVz9LpEbVEnbnZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road.
It
> will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
> general wheeling, it does just fine.
>
> Carl
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
larger than a four bagger: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
"Carl S" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:QbidnVz9LpEbVEnbnZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road.
It
> will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
> general wheeling, it does just fine.
>
> Carl
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
#100
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Advice please: '90 YJ Conversion
It's easy to tell those that have never driven a Jeep with anything
larger than a four bagger: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
"Carl S" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:QbidnVz9LpEbVEnbnZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road.
It
> will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
> general wheeling, it does just fine.
>
> Carl
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
larger than a four bagger: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
"Carl S" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:QbidnVz9LpEbVEnbnZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> I have to agree with snow. Properly geared, the 2.5L does great off road.
It
> will never do well in mud bogs or on the highway, but as far as trails and
> general wheeling, it does just fine.
>
> Carl
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com