95 ZJ Two symptoms, what's the problem?
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 95 ZJ Two symptoms, what's the problem?
Will Honea proclaimed:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 03:33:54 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Will,
>> Back when I was serious drag racer in the sixties we bought engines
>>cast for Colorado to gain a compression ratio running stock classes.
>>This Cherokee build order eludes to the difference still in cars:
>>"Emissions - High Altitude Tracking".
>>
>
>
> I thought that on those the "High Altitude Tracking" was mostly the
> aneroid that adjusted the metering rod positions. I guess now (with
> computer control and FI) that the MAF or MAP sensors wind up doing
> most of the adjusting thru the computer.
>
Dunno of any vehicle these days that comes with optional "Denver
Heads"
The OP has something wrong though. I get a power loss at high
altitude such as crossing the Colorado rockies, Sonora Pass, etc
but have never had the stalling, coughing, bucking etc.
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 03:33:54 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Will,
>> Back when I was serious drag racer in the sixties we bought engines
>>cast for Colorado to gain a compression ratio running stock classes.
>>This Cherokee build order eludes to the difference still in cars:
>>"Emissions - High Altitude Tracking".
>>
>
>
> I thought that on those the "High Altitude Tracking" was mostly the
> aneroid that adjusted the metering rod positions. I guess now (with
> computer control and FI) that the MAF or MAP sensors wind up doing
> most of the adjusting thru the computer.
>
Dunno of any vehicle these days that comes with optional "Denver
Heads"
The OP has something wrong though. I get a power loss at high
altitude such as crossing the Colorado rockies, Sonora Pass, etc
but have never had the stalling, coughing, bucking etc.
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 95 ZJ Two symptoms, what's the problem?
Will Honea proclaimed:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 03:33:54 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Will,
>> Back when I was serious drag racer in the sixties we bought engines
>>cast for Colorado to gain a compression ratio running stock classes.
>>This Cherokee build order eludes to the difference still in cars:
>>"Emissions - High Altitude Tracking".
>>
>
>
> I thought that on those the "High Altitude Tracking" was mostly the
> aneroid that adjusted the metering rod positions. I guess now (with
> computer control and FI) that the MAF or MAP sensors wind up doing
> most of the adjusting thru the computer.
>
Dunno of any vehicle these days that comes with optional "Denver
Heads"
The OP has something wrong though. I get a power loss at high
altitude such as crossing the Colorado rockies, Sonora Pass, etc
but have never had the stalling, coughing, bucking etc.
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 03:33:54 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Will,
>> Back when I was serious drag racer in the sixties we bought engines
>>cast for Colorado to gain a compression ratio running stock classes.
>>This Cherokee build order eludes to the difference still in cars:
>>"Emissions - High Altitude Tracking".
>>
>
>
> I thought that on those the "High Altitude Tracking" was mostly the
> aneroid that adjusted the metering rod positions. I guess now (with
> computer control and FI) that the MAF or MAP sensors wind up doing
> most of the adjusting thru the computer.
>
Dunno of any vehicle these days that comes with optional "Denver
Heads"
The OP has something wrong though. I get a power loss at high
altitude such as crossing the Colorado rockies, Sonora Pass, etc
but have never had the stalling, coughing, bucking etc.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
updawaz00@hotmail.com
Jeep Mailing List
9
03-29-2005 01:26 PM
M. E. Bye
Jeep Mailing List
2
09-07-2003 10:48 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)