Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> You may bolt an older exhaust on to the 4.0 liter, but the 258 CID > carburetor manifold will not match the ports: > http://www.----------.com/temp/258vs4LPorts.jpg Ok if I e-mail you a picture of my 88 YJ's black powdercoated 2bbl aluminum intake bolted to a 0630 4.0 head and Stainless OEM style 4.0 header with a small sign that reads "Bill is wrong" will you post it and admit the sign is correct? -- Simon "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
Mike Romain wrote:
> So in other words, you can junk the fuel injection on a 4.0, drop in a > cam and go with a carb and maybe a nice 4.2 performance intake to > 'really' get some power out of it. :-) I'll tell you if you really want some power out of a Jeep 6, do a 4.0 stroker, the 4.6 (or more) with a 4.2 crank and rods is a real eye opener if you're used to the 4.2 or 4.0... It's not hard at all to put down more RWHP than a stock Mustang 5.0 with a mildly messaged stroker. The 4.0 w/ FI is definitely a better bet for power than ANY combintation of upgrades with a 4.2, (short of forced induction). I know you're fond of that old turd of an engine Mike but lets face it that thing was rated at just over a hundred hp and torque in it's day... And that might have been optimistic or even flywheel numbers... The 4.0 whips the pants off it in just about every regard. I own and wheel all three engines and I'll never build on a 4.2 again... waste of time. -- Simon "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
Mike Romain wrote:
> So in other words, you can junk the fuel injection on a 4.0, drop in a > cam and go with a carb and maybe a nice 4.2 performance intake to > 'really' get some power out of it. :-) I'll tell you if you really want some power out of a Jeep 6, do a 4.0 stroker, the 4.6 (or more) with a 4.2 crank and rods is a real eye opener if you're used to the 4.2 or 4.0... It's not hard at all to put down more RWHP than a stock Mustang 5.0 with a mildly messaged stroker. The 4.0 w/ FI is definitely a better bet for power than ANY combintation of upgrades with a 4.2, (short of forced induction). I know you're fond of that old turd of an engine Mike but lets face it that thing was rated at just over a hundred hp and torque in it's day... And that might have been optimistic or even flywheel numbers... The 4.0 whips the pants off it in just about every regard. I own and wheel all three engines and I'll never build on a 4.2 again... waste of time. -- Simon "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
Mike Romain wrote:
> So in other words, you can junk the fuel injection on a 4.0, drop in a > cam and go with a carb and maybe a nice 4.2 performance intake to > 'really' get some power out of it. :-) I'll tell you if you really want some power out of a Jeep 6, do a 4.0 stroker, the 4.6 (or more) with a 4.2 crank and rods is a real eye opener if you're used to the 4.2 or 4.0... It's not hard at all to put down more RWHP than a stock Mustang 5.0 with a mildly messaged stroker. The 4.0 w/ FI is definitely a better bet for power than ANY combintation of upgrades with a 4.2, (short of forced induction). I know you're fond of that old turd of an engine Mike but lets face it that thing was rated at just over a hundred hp and torque in it's day... And that might have been optimistic or even flywheel numbers... The 4.0 whips the pants off it in just about every regard. I own and wheel all three engines and I'll never build on a 4.2 again... waste of time. -- Simon "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
Mail it to me and I'll post it.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Simon Juncal wrote: > > Ok if I e-mail you a picture of my 88 YJ's black powdercoated 2bbl > aluminum intake bolted to a 0630 4.0 head and Stainless OEM style 4.0 > header with a small sign that reads "Bill is wrong" will you post it and > admit the sign is correct? > > -- > Simon |
Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
Mail it to me and I'll post it.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Simon Juncal wrote: > > Ok if I e-mail you a picture of my 88 YJ's black powdercoated 2bbl > aluminum intake bolted to a 0630 4.0 head and Stainless OEM style 4.0 > header with a small sign that reads "Bill is wrong" will you post it and > admit the sign is correct? > > -- > Simon |
Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
Mail it to me and I'll post it.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Simon Juncal wrote: > > Ok if I e-mail you a picture of my 88 YJ's black powdercoated 2bbl > aluminum intake bolted to a 0630 4.0 head and Stainless OEM style 4.0 > header with a small sign that reads "Bill is wrong" will you post it and > admit the sign is correct? > > -- > Simon |
Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
I was correcting Simon assumption: You may bolt an older exhaust on
to the 4.0 liter "head", but the 258 CID carburetor manifold will not match the ports: http://www.----------.com/temp/258vs4LPorts.jpg Mike, you did notice the difference in your head and an fuel injection head????? God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Mike Romain wrote: > > Sorry Bill, but you are mistaken. Folks swap the 4.0 head onto the 4.2 > engine all the time. 'I' don't like the idea of relying on epoxy to > hold the coolant passages, but hey that's me. > > You only have to change the exhaust for the 4.0 header, the intake > matches up just fine so the carb can go back on the 4.0 head. > > http://www.off-road.com/jeep/new/40conv.html > > So in other words, you can junk the fuel injection on a 4.0, drop in a > cam and go with a carb and maybe a nice 4.2 performance intake to > 'really' get some power out of it. :-) > > Mike > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! > Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 > (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) > > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" wrote: > > > > You may bolt an older exhaust on to the 4.0 liter, but the 258 CID > > carburetor manifold will not match the ports: > > http://www.----------.com/temp/258vs4LPorts.jpg > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- > > > > Simon Juncal wrote: > > > > > > I'm not sure which manifold you're talking about... the exhuast manifold > > > changed but the port pattern is the same so it's just a matter of > > > swaping manifolds, or fab'ing or buying a new collector pipe, and > > > modifiying brackets for clearance. The intake manifold also has the same > > > port pattern and is 100% interchangable from Renix to non-HO mopar MPI, > > > to HO, to even the newest intake (99 and up rounded runners). In fact > > > you can even use an old 4.2L carbureted 2bbl intake manifold on a 7120 > > > or 0630 head. Those are both HO "high port" heads without the 0331 > > > head's penchant for cracking. > > > > > > Again this might require some minor drilling, grinding, maybe even some > > > welding to get workable brackets and power steering but if you're doing > > > an engine swap and the thought of drilling, grinding and welding scares > > > you then you probably ought re-think doing it. :) > > > > > > -- > > > Simon > > > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
I was correcting Simon assumption: You may bolt an older exhaust on
to the 4.0 liter "head", but the 258 CID carburetor manifold will not match the ports: http://www.----------.com/temp/258vs4LPorts.jpg Mike, you did notice the difference in your head and an fuel injection head????? God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Mike Romain wrote: > > Sorry Bill, but you are mistaken. Folks swap the 4.0 head onto the 4.2 > engine all the time. 'I' don't like the idea of relying on epoxy to > hold the coolant passages, but hey that's me. > > You only have to change the exhaust for the 4.0 header, the intake > matches up just fine so the carb can go back on the 4.0 head. > > http://www.off-road.com/jeep/new/40conv.html > > So in other words, you can junk the fuel injection on a 4.0, drop in a > cam and go with a carb and maybe a nice 4.2 performance intake to > 'really' get some power out of it. :-) > > Mike > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! > Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 > (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) > > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" wrote: > > > > You may bolt an older exhaust on to the 4.0 liter, but the 258 CID > > carburetor manifold will not match the ports: > > http://www.----------.com/temp/258vs4LPorts.jpg > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- > > > > Simon Juncal wrote: > > > > > > I'm not sure which manifold you're talking about... the exhuast manifold > > > changed but the port pattern is the same so it's just a matter of > > > swaping manifolds, or fab'ing or buying a new collector pipe, and > > > modifiying brackets for clearance. The intake manifold also has the same > > > port pattern and is 100% interchangable from Renix to non-HO mopar MPI, > > > to HO, to even the newest intake (99 and up rounded runners). In fact > > > you can even use an old 4.2L carbureted 2bbl intake manifold on a 7120 > > > or 0630 head. Those are both HO "high port" heads without the 0331 > > > head's penchant for cracking. > > > > > > Again this might require some minor drilling, grinding, maybe even some > > > welding to get workable brackets and power steering but if you're doing > > > an engine swap and the thought of drilling, grinding and welding scares > > > you then you probably ought re-think doing it. :) > > > > > > -- > > > Simon > > > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: 91 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 engine transplant.
I was correcting Simon assumption: You may bolt an older exhaust on
to the 4.0 liter "head", but the 258 CID carburetor manifold will not match the ports: http://www.----------.com/temp/258vs4LPorts.jpg Mike, you did notice the difference in your head and an fuel injection head????? God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Mike Romain wrote: > > Sorry Bill, but you are mistaken. Folks swap the 4.0 head onto the 4.2 > engine all the time. 'I' don't like the idea of relying on epoxy to > hold the coolant passages, but hey that's me. > > You only have to change the exhaust for the 4.0 header, the intake > matches up just fine so the carb can go back on the 4.0 head. > > http://www.off-road.com/jeep/new/40conv.html > > So in other words, you can junk the fuel injection on a 4.0, drop in a > cam and go with a carb and maybe a nice 4.2 performance intake to > 'really' get some power out of it. :-) > > Mike > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! > Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 > (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) > > "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" wrote: > > > > You may bolt an older exhaust on to the 4.0 liter, but the 258 CID > > carburetor manifold will not match the ports: > > http://www.----------.com/temp/258vs4LPorts.jpg > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- > > > > Simon Juncal wrote: > > > > > > I'm not sure which manifold you're talking about... the exhuast manifold > > > changed but the port pattern is the same so it's just a matter of > > > swaping manifolds, or fab'ing or buying a new collector pipe, and > > > modifiying brackets for clearance. The intake manifold also has the same > > > port pattern and is 100% interchangable from Renix to non-HO mopar MPI, > > > to HO, to even the newest intake (99 and up rounded runners). In fact > > > you can even use an old 4.2L carbureted 2bbl intake manifold on a 7120 > > > or 0630 head. Those are both HO "high port" heads without the 0331 > > > head's penchant for cracking. > > > > > > Again this might require some minor drilling, grinding, maybe even some > > > welding to get workable brackets and power steering but if you're doing > > > an engine swap and the thought of drilling, grinding and welding scares > > > you then you probably ought re-think doing it. :) > > > > > > -- > > > Simon > > > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands