'88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
02-11-2004, 06:52 PM
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
I wonder if the '88 shipped to Holland had the enlarged engine
compartment.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> easily be wrong there.
>
> Mike
compartment.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> easily be wrong there.
>
> Mike
02-11-2004, 06:52 PM
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
I wonder if the '88 shipped to Holland had the enlarged engine
compartment.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> easily be wrong there.
>
> Mike
compartment.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> easily be wrong there.
>
> Mike
02-11-2004, 06:52 PM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
I wonder if the '88 shipped to Holland had the enlarged engine
compartment.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> easily be wrong there.
>
> Mike
compartment.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> easily be wrong there.
>
> Mike
02-11-2004, 07:35 PM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
Hey maybe it took two years to get there and the 1986 became a 1988 there.
lol
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:402AC02C.DA08083D@***.net...
> I wonder if the '88 shipped to Holland had the enlarged engine
> compartment.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> > easily be wrong there.
> >
> > Mike
lol
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:402AC02C.DA08083D@***.net...
> I wonder if the '88 shipped to Holland had the enlarged engine
> compartment.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> > easily be wrong there.
> >
> > Mike
02-11-2004, 07:35 PM
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
Hey maybe it took two years to get there and the 1986 became a 1988 there.
lol
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:402AC02C.DA08083D@***.net...
> I wonder if the '88 shipped to Holland had the enlarged engine
> compartment.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> > easily be wrong there.
> >
> > Mike
lol
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:402AC02C.DA08083D@***.net...
> I wonder if the '88 shipped to Holland had the enlarged engine
> compartment.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> > easily be wrong there.
> >
> > Mike
02-11-2004, 07:35 PM
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
Hey maybe it took two years to get there and the 1986 became a 1988 there.
lol
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:402AC02C.DA08083D@***.net...
> I wonder if the '88 shipped to Holland had the enlarged engine
> compartment.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> > easily be wrong there.
> >
> > Mike
lol
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:402AC02C.DA08083D@***.net...
> I wonder if the '88 shipped to Holland had the enlarged engine
> compartment.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > I am in Canada and thought the next door neighbor had an 87. Could
> > easily be wrong there.
> >
> > Mike
02-11-2004, 11:56 PM
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
>It was originally fitted with the 2.8 litre engine.
>I live in the Netherlands, because of the lack of hills and unpaved roads
>there is hardly any need to have a 4 litre engine.
There was not a choice between a 2.8 and a 4.0. The 4.0 replaced the 2.8.
KennyH
Horsepower is cheaper than therapy.
>I live in the Netherlands, because of the lack of hills and unpaved roads
>there is hardly any need to have a 4 litre engine.
There was not a choice between a 2.8 and a 4.0. The 4.0 replaced the 2.8.
KennyH
Horsepower is cheaper than therapy.
02-11-2004, 11:56 PM
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
>It was originally fitted with the 2.8 litre engine.
>I live in the Netherlands, because of the lack of hills and unpaved roads
>there is hardly any need to have a 4 litre engine.
There was not a choice between a 2.8 and a 4.0. The 4.0 replaced the 2.8.
KennyH
Horsepower is cheaper than therapy.
>I live in the Netherlands, because of the lack of hills and unpaved roads
>there is hardly any need to have a 4 litre engine.
There was not a choice between a 2.8 and a 4.0. The 4.0 replaced the 2.8.
KennyH
Horsepower is cheaper than therapy.
02-11-2004, 11:56 PM
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
>It was originally fitted with the 2.8 litre engine.
>I live in the Netherlands, because of the lack of hills and unpaved roads
>there is hardly any need to have a 4 litre engine.
There was not a choice between a 2.8 and a 4.0. The 4.0 replaced the 2.8.
KennyH
Horsepower is cheaper than therapy.
>I live in the Netherlands, because of the lack of hills and unpaved roads
>there is hardly any need to have a 4 litre engine.
There was not a choice between a 2.8 and a 4.0. The 4.0 replaced the 2.8.
KennyH
Horsepower is cheaper than therapy.
02-11-2004, 11:56 PM
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: '88 Cherokee 2.8V6 (GM), no spark
In message <lryWb.5939$PY.5783@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>, "dave AKA vwdoc1"
wrote:
>Hmmm
>I thought it was 1986 in the XJs in the USA and in 1987 the 4.0 was
>introduced in them.
You are correct. Last year for the 2.8L was 1986. The 4.0 was introduced in
1987.
>
>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:402A3E3D.69C614B9@sympatico.ca...
>> 87 was the last year for the 2.8 in North America.
>
wrote:
>Hmmm
>I thought it was 1986 in the XJs in the USA and in 1987 the 4.0 was
>introduced in them.
You are correct. Last year for the 2.8L was 1986. The 4.0 was introduced in
1987.
>
>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:402A3E3D.69C614B9@sympatico.ca...
>> 87 was the last year for the 2.8 in North America.
>
