![]() |
Re: 87 XJ Cherokee upgrade or...
Not only that, but a well maintained automatic will last longer and be a lot
easier in the hills and rocks. john "Kamen Penev" <usenet2@penev.net> wrote in message news:1010bku1r2pn871@corp.supernews.com... > Towing capacity is only 2000lb with the 5 sp manual. With the automatic > and heavy-duty cooling, the XJ is rated to tow 5000 lb. Power is > plentiful with the 4.0. I have towed a popup trailer over the Grapevine > in So. Cal. (about 5000 ft elevation). No problem. The Jeep easily > maintained 65 mph uphill. > > Mine is 5sp. I see no advantage whatsoever. Why do you insist on the stick? > > Kamen > 93 XJ 4.0 > > Charles Stoyer wrote: > > Right now I have Jeep Cherokees (2 x 1987) and am looking to upgrade. I can > > get a 1994 Cherokee for around $4k if I can find one. I am in Denver area. > > > > Complaints about Cherokee are low power (I drive between 6,000 and 11,000 > > feet above sea level), not so great mileage (20 mpg on a good day) and poor > > towing capacity (snowmobile trailer w/2 sleds). Cherokees have about > > 180-190k miles on them. > > > > Chains don't fit well on rear wheels - low fender clearance, low spring > > clearance (leaf springs). > > > > Engine compartment is tight, cargo capacity is OK. Off-road capability is > > good. > > > > I am looking for 5-speed manual, maybe a more modern engine (24 valves?) > > than the straight six in the Cherokee. Cherokee supposedly has 177 HP, newer > > (HO) engines have 190, I think. At 6,000 feet and above, my 86 SAAB 900 > > Turbo with 160 HP and weighing 2,900 lbs (Jeep weighs around 3,100) will > > suck the doors off either of the Jeeps at 231k miles. > > > > It seems the Toyota 4runner is lower power and heavier vehicle, also a lot > > more expensive. Got a loan of an Izuzu Rodeo and it seemed like a nice > > vehicle but they are notorious for burning up engines. Don't even talk about > > the Ford Exploder. Nissan Pathfinder is not impressive. JGC (ZJ) does not > > come with 5-speed manual, so that is out (although some early ones did but > > they are hard to find). > > > > Would most power in a light (3,000 lb) SUV be maybe a 94 or so Cherokee with > > a free flow cat-back exhaust? I seem to keep coming back to Jeep for light > > vehicle with power and low cost. > > > > I know you guys are gonna favor Jeep but maybe you can say what to really > > stay away from, besides what I already mentioned. Or what comparisons have > > you made before buying Jeep? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Charles. > > > > > > |
Re: 87 XJ Cherokee upgrade or...
Not only that, but a well maintained automatic will last longer and be a lot
easier in the hills and rocks. john "Kamen Penev" <usenet2@penev.net> wrote in message news:1010bku1r2pn871@corp.supernews.com... > Towing capacity is only 2000lb with the 5 sp manual. With the automatic > and heavy-duty cooling, the XJ is rated to tow 5000 lb. Power is > plentiful with the 4.0. I have towed a popup trailer over the Grapevine > in So. Cal. (about 5000 ft elevation). No problem. The Jeep easily > maintained 65 mph uphill. > > Mine is 5sp. I see no advantage whatsoever. Why do you insist on the stick? > > Kamen > 93 XJ 4.0 > > Charles Stoyer wrote: > > Right now I have Jeep Cherokees (2 x 1987) and am looking to upgrade. I can > > get a 1994 Cherokee for around $4k if I can find one. I am in Denver area. > > > > Complaints about Cherokee are low power (I drive between 6,000 and 11,000 > > feet above sea level), not so great mileage (20 mpg on a good day) and poor > > towing capacity (snowmobile trailer w/2 sleds). Cherokees have about > > 180-190k miles on them. > > > > Chains don't fit well on rear wheels - low fender clearance, low spring > > clearance (leaf springs). > > > > Engine compartment is tight, cargo capacity is OK. Off-road capability is > > good. > > > > I am looking for 5-speed manual, maybe a more modern engine (24 valves?) > > than the straight six in the Cherokee. Cherokee supposedly has 177 HP, newer > > (HO) engines have 190, I think. At 6,000 feet and above, my 86 SAAB 900 > > Turbo with 160 HP and weighing 2,900 lbs (Jeep weighs around 3,100) will > > suck the doors off either of the Jeeps at 231k miles. > > > > It seems the Toyota 4runner is lower power and heavier vehicle, also a lot > > more expensive. Got a loan of an Izuzu Rodeo and it seemed like a nice > > vehicle but they are notorious for burning up engines. Don't even talk about > > the Ford Exploder. Nissan Pathfinder is not impressive. JGC (ZJ) does not > > come with 5-speed manual, so that is out (although some early ones did but > > they are hard to find). > > > > Would most power in a light (3,000 lb) SUV be maybe a 94 or so Cherokee with > > a free flow cat-back exhaust? I seem to keep coming back to Jeep for light > > vehicle with power and low cost. > > > > I know you guys are gonna favor Jeep but maybe you can say what to really > > stay away from, besides what I already mentioned. Or what comparisons have > > you made before buying Jeep? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Charles. > > > > > > |
Re: 87 XJ Cherokee upgrade or...
Not only that, but a well maintained automatic will last longer and be a lot
easier in the hills and rocks. john "Kamen Penev" <usenet2@penev.net> wrote in message news:1010bku1r2pn871@corp.supernews.com... > Towing capacity is only 2000lb with the 5 sp manual. With the automatic > and heavy-duty cooling, the XJ is rated to tow 5000 lb. Power is > plentiful with the 4.0. I have towed a popup trailer over the Grapevine > in So. Cal. (about 5000 ft elevation). No problem. The Jeep easily > maintained 65 mph uphill. > > Mine is 5sp. I see no advantage whatsoever. Why do you insist on the stick? > > Kamen > 93 XJ 4.0 > > Charles Stoyer wrote: > > Right now I have Jeep Cherokees (2 x 1987) and am looking to upgrade. I can > > get a 1994 Cherokee for around $4k if I can find one. I am in Denver area. > > > > Complaints about Cherokee are low power (I drive between 6,000 and 11,000 > > feet above sea level), not so great mileage (20 mpg on a good day) and poor > > towing capacity (snowmobile trailer w/2 sleds). Cherokees have about > > 180-190k miles on them. > > > > Chains don't fit well on rear wheels - low fender clearance, low spring > > clearance (leaf springs). > > > > Engine compartment is tight, cargo capacity is OK. Off-road capability is > > good. > > > > I am looking for 5-speed manual, maybe a more modern engine (24 valves?) > > than the straight six in the Cherokee. Cherokee supposedly has 177 HP, newer > > (HO) engines have 190, I think. At 6,000 feet and above, my 86 SAAB 900 > > Turbo with 160 HP and weighing 2,900 lbs (Jeep weighs around 3,100) will > > suck the doors off either of the Jeeps at 231k miles. > > > > It seems the Toyota 4runner is lower power and heavier vehicle, also a lot > > more expensive. Got a loan of an Izuzu Rodeo and it seemed like a nice > > vehicle but they are notorious for burning up engines. Don't even talk about > > the Ford Exploder. Nissan Pathfinder is not impressive. JGC (ZJ) does not > > come with 5-speed manual, so that is out (although some early ones did but > > they are hard to find). > > > > Would most power in a light (3,000 lb) SUV be maybe a 94 or so Cherokee with > > a free flow cat-back exhaust? I seem to keep coming back to Jeep for light > > vehicle with power and low cost. > > > > I know you guys are gonna favor Jeep but maybe you can say what to really > > stay away from, besides what I already mentioned. Or what comparisons have > > you made before buying Jeep? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Charles. > > > > > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands