L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

I vote for the '66. I is so nice not to have to SMOG my CJ-2A every
other year.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

NB wrote:
>
> I am trying to decide which jeep I should rebuild. They both need a
> lot of work, but the '75 will require emmissions testing for
> registration. Are there any reasons why I should not build the '66?
>
> Also, I have a 225 V6 and a 258 I6. Both need to be rebuilt. I am
> leaning toward the 258, but I think the V6 is supposed to be lighter.
> Any ideas?
>
> Is the '66 frame much different from the '75? Maybe I should use the
> '66 frame and some of the components (i.e. 11" brakes) from the '75.
>
> Thanks for your advice,
>
> Nathan

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Kalifornia: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Where the Hell do you live that an emissions test is needed on a 30 year old
> vehicle?

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Kalifornia: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Where the Hell do you live that an emissions test is needed on a 30 year old
> vehicle?

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Kalifornia: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Where the Hell do you live that an emissions test is needed on a 30 year old
> vehicle?

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Kalifornia: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Where the Hell do you live that an emissions test is needed on a 30 year old
> vehicle?

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Kalifornia, in 2008 it will become retroactive for the twenty five
year old to be SMOG exempted.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Where the Hell do you live that an emissions test is needed on a 30 year old
> vehicle?

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Kalifornia, in 2008 it will become retroactive for the twenty five
year old to be SMOG exempted.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Where the Hell do you live that an emissions test is needed on a 30 year old
> vehicle?

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Kalifornia, in 2008 it will become retroactive for the twenty five
year old to be SMOG exempted.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Where the Hell do you live that an emissions test is needed on a 30 year old
> vehicle?

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Kalifornia, in 2008 it will become retroactive for the twenty five
year old to be SMOG exempted.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Where the Hell do you live that an emissions test is needed on a 30 year old
> vehicle?

Charlie

Jerry McG wrote:

> Where the Hell do you live that an emissions test is needed on a 30 year
> old vehicle?
>

Arizona is about just as bad. Anything '67 and newer has to be tested.



--
"Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step.
The prohibition of private firearms is the goal."
- Janet Reno