6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
If you plan on a considerable amount of highway travel - open roads, doing
70+ mph - then you will be much happier with the 6, and the fuel mileage
isn't enough different to justify the smaller motor. If you will be driving
around town and hitting the occasional trail, then the 4 will be fine. If
you get the 4, be sure to take the manual trans, if you opt for the 6, then
it is your choice of manual or auto.
"Patrick" <billardpatrick@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:42a15bce$0$25030$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr...
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
>
70+ mph - then you will be much happier with the 6, and the fuel mileage
isn't enough different to justify the smaller motor. If you will be driving
around town and hitting the occasional trail, then the 4 will be fine. If
you get the 4, be sure to take the manual trans, if you opt for the 6, then
it is your choice of manual or auto.
"Patrick" <billardpatrick@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:42a15bce$0$25030$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr...
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
If you plan on a considerable amount of highway travel - open roads, doing
70+ mph - then you will be much happier with the 6, and the fuel mileage
isn't enough different to justify the smaller motor. If you will be driving
around town and hitting the occasional trail, then the 4 will be fine. If
you get the 4, be sure to take the manual trans, if you opt for the 6, then
it is your choice of manual or auto.
"Patrick" <billardpatrick@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:42a15bce$0$25030$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr...
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
>
70+ mph - then you will be much happier with the 6, and the fuel mileage
isn't enough different to justify the smaller motor. If you will be driving
around town and hitting the occasional trail, then the 4 will be fine. If
you get the 4, be sure to take the manual trans, if you opt for the 6, then
it is your choice of manual or auto.
"Patrick" <billardpatrick@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:42a15bce$0$25030$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr...
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
If you plan on a considerable amount of highway travel - open roads, doing
70+ mph - then you will be much happier with the 6, and the fuel mileage
isn't enough different to justify the smaller motor. If you will be driving
around town and hitting the occasional trail, then the 4 will be fine. If
you get the 4, be sure to take the manual trans, if you opt for the 6, then
it is your choice of manual or auto.
"Patrick" <billardpatrick@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:42a15bce$0$25030$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr...
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
>
70+ mph - then you will be much happier with the 6, and the fuel mileage
isn't enough different to justify the smaller motor. If you will be driving
around town and hitting the occasional trail, then the 4 will be fine. If
you get the 4, be sure to take the manual trans, if you opt for the 6, then
it is your choice of manual or auto.
"Patrick" <billardpatrick@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:42a15bce$0$25030$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr...
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
I don't know the EPA estimates, but I'm inclined to think that with a 3.07
for a 4.0 and a 4.10 for a 2.5, they ought to get about the same gas
mileage.
The 4.0 here in America is worth it based on resale alone. I've seen people
try and sell 2.5 Jeeps here in America and have difficulty selling them.
Seems everyone wants the 4.0.
--
Registered Linux user #378193
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
I don't know the EPA estimates, but I'm inclined to think that with a 3.07
for a 4.0 and a 4.10 for a 2.5, they ought to get about the same gas
mileage.
The 4.0 here in America is worth it based on resale alone. I've seen people
try and sell 2.5 Jeeps here in America and have difficulty selling them.
Seems everyone wants the 4.0.
--
Registered Linux user #378193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
I don't know the EPA estimates, but I'm inclined to think that with a 3.07
for a 4.0 and a 4.10 for a 2.5, they ought to get about the same gas
mileage.
The 4.0 here in America is worth it based on resale alone. I've seen people
try and sell 2.5 Jeeps here in America and have difficulty selling them.
Seems everyone wants the 4.0.
--
Registered Linux user #378193
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
I don't know the EPA estimates, but I'm inclined to think that with a 3.07
for a 4.0 and a 4.10 for a 2.5, they ought to get about the same gas
mileage.
The 4.0 here in America is worth it based on resale alone. I've seen people
try and sell 2.5 Jeeps here in America and have difficulty selling them.
Seems everyone wants the 4.0.
--
Registered Linux user #378193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
I don't know the EPA estimates, but I'm inclined to think that with a 3.07
for a 4.0 and a 4.10 for a 2.5, they ought to get about the same gas
mileage.
The 4.0 here in America is worth it based on resale alone. I've seen people
try and sell 2.5 Jeeps here in America and have difficulty selling them.
Seems everyone wants the 4.0.
--
Registered Linux user #378193
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
I don't know the EPA estimates, but I'm inclined to think that with a 3.07
for a 4.0 and a 4.10 for a 2.5, they ought to get about the same gas
mileage.
The 4.0 here in America is worth it based on resale alone. I've seen people
try and sell 2.5 Jeeps here in America and have difficulty selling them.
Seems everyone wants the 4.0.
--
Registered Linux user #378193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
I don't know the EPA estimates, but I'm inclined to think that with a 3.07
for a 4.0 and a 4.10 for a 2.5, they ought to get about the same gas
mileage.
The 4.0 here in America is worth it based on resale alone. I've seen people
try and sell 2.5 Jeeps here in America and have difficulty selling them.
Seems everyone wants the 4.0.
--
Registered Linux user #378193
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4
> four cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3
> only off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the
> third vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
I don't know the EPA estimates, but I'm inclined to think that with a 3.07
for a 4.0 and a 4.10 for a 2.5, they ought to get about the same gas
mileage.
The 4.0 here in America is worth it based on resale alone. I've seen people
try and sell 2.5 Jeeps here in America and have difficulty selling them.
Seems everyone wants the 4.0.
--
Registered Linux user #378193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
get the six the 4 is a dog, a lug, slow
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4 four
> cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3 only
> off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the third
> vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4 four
> cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3 only
> off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the third
> vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
get the six the 4 is a dog, a lug, slow
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4 four
> cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3 only
> off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the third
> vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4 four
> cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3 only
> off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the third
> vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 or 4 cylinders for the wrangler ?
get the six the 4 is a dog, a lug, slow
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4 four
> cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3 only
> off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the third
> vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick
Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
> Over here in old Europe ;)) wrangler jeeps are sold either with the 2.4 four
> cylinder or the 4.0 six cylinder engine.
> Due to the high price of gas i'm enclined for the 2.4 version but the
> retailer told me it does not worth it compared to the 4.0 !
> Is the four cylinders a bad purchase considering the usage will be 1/3 only
> off road (to go fishing in remote access area) and it will be the third
> vehicule in the family, for fun usage only ?
> Thanks for your wise advices
> Best regards
> Patrick