5.9 Hi-Po Intake Manifold
Guest
Posts: n/a
the part number i do not know but the intake is known as the mi intake and it's
recommended to have a new thottle body 65mm i believe and headers to make the
intake flow right
RCSnyder wrote:
> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake manifold
> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>
> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
> result.
>
> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>
> Thanks in advance.
recommended to have a new thottle body 65mm i believe and headers to make the
intake flow right
RCSnyder wrote:
> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake manifold
> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>
> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
> result.
>
> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>
> Thanks in advance.
Guest
Posts: n/a
the part number i do not know but the intake is known as the mi intake and it's
recommended to have a new thottle body 65mm i believe and headers to make the
intake flow right
RCSnyder wrote:
> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake manifold
> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>
> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
> result.
>
> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>
> Thanks in advance.
recommended to have a new thottle body 65mm i believe and headers to make the
intake flow right
RCSnyder wrote:
> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake manifold
> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>
> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
> result.
>
> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>
> Thanks in advance.
Guest
Posts: n/a
the part number i do not know but the intake is known as the mi intake and it's
recommended to have a new thottle body 65mm i believe and headers to make the
intake flow right
RCSnyder wrote:
> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake manifold
> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>
> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
> result.
>
> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>
> Thanks in advance.
recommended to have a new thottle body 65mm i believe and headers to make the
intake flow right
RCSnyder wrote:
> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake manifold
> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>
> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
> result.
>
> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>
> Thanks in advance.
Guest
Posts: n/a
No relationship whatsoever. The old 360 is the AMC engine while this 5.9 is
pure Mopar.
"Fred V." <fredvp@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:mldEf.10318$NS6.9699@newssvr30.news.prodigy.c om...
>I wonder if this engine you mention is similar to the 5.9 that was in the
>old Grand Wagoneer?
> Fred
>
>
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:V7SDf.32981$bF.21819@dukeread07...
>> RCSnyder did pass the time by typing:
>>> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake
>>> manifold
>>> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>>>
>>> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
>>> result.
>>>
>>> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Like this?
>> http://buymopar.com/store/magnum.html
>> half way down or there abouts. But it's not for your application.
>>
>> I'd write them and ask, if it's a Mopar HighPerformance part they would
>> know.
>>
>> --
>> DougW
>>
>
>
pure Mopar.
"Fred V." <fredvp@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:mldEf.10318$NS6.9699@newssvr30.news.prodigy.c om...
>I wonder if this engine you mention is similar to the 5.9 that was in the
>old Grand Wagoneer?
> Fred
>
>
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:V7SDf.32981$bF.21819@dukeread07...
>> RCSnyder did pass the time by typing:
>>> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake
>>> manifold
>>> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>>>
>>> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
>>> result.
>>>
>>> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Like this?
>> http://buymopar.com/store/magnum.html
>> half way down or there abouts. But it's not for your application.
>>
>> I'd write them and ask, if it's a Mopar HighPerformance part they would
>> know.
>>
>> --
>> DougW
>>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
No relationship whatsoever. The old 360 is the AMC engine while this 5.9 is
pure Mopar.
"Fred V." <fredvp@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:mldEf.10318$NS6.9699@newssvr30.news.prodigy.c om...
>I wonder if this engine you mention is similar to the 5.9 that was in the
>old Grand Wagoneer?
> Fred
>
>
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:V7SDf.32981$bF.21819@dukeread07...
>> RCSnyder did pass the time by typing:
>>> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake
>>> manifold
>>> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>>>
>>> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
>>> result.
>>>
>>> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Like this?
>> http://buymopar.com/store/magnum.html
>> half way down or there abouts. But it's not for your application.
>>
>> I'd write them and ask, if it's a Mopar HighPerformance part they would
>> know.
>>
>> --
>> DougW
>>
>
>
pure Mopar.
"Fred V." <fredvp@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:mldEf.10318$NS6.9699@newssvr30.news.prodigy.c om...
>I wonder if this engine you mention is similar to the 5.9 that was in the
>old Grand Wagoneer?
> Fred
>
>
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:V7SDf.32981$bF.21819@dukeread07...
>> RCSnyder did pass the time by typing:
>>> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake
>>> manifold
>>> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>>>
>>> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
>>> result.
>>>
>>> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Like this?
>> http://buymopar.com/store/magnum.html
>> half way down or there abouts. But it's not for your application.
>>
>> I'd write them and ask, if it's a Mopar HighPerformance part they would
>> know.
>>
>> --
>> DougW
>>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
No relationship whatsoever. The old 360 is the AMC engine while this 5.9 is
pure Mopar.
"Fred V." <fredvp@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:mldEf.10318$NS6.9699@newssvr30.news.prodigy.c om...
>I wonder if this engine you mention is similar to the 5.9 that was in the
>old Grand Wagoneer?
> Fred
>
>
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:V7SDf.32981$bF.21819@dukeread07...
>> RCSnyder did pass the time by typing:
>>> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake
>>> manifold
>>> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>>>
>>> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
>>> result.
>>>
>>> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Like this?
>> http://buymopar.com/store/magnum.html
>> half way down or there abouts. But it's not for your application.
>>
>> I'd write them and ask, if it's a Mopar HighPerformance part they would
>> know.
>>
>> --
>> DougW
>>
>
>
pure Mopar.
"Fred V." <fredvp@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:mldEf.10318$NS6.9699@newssvr30.news.prodigy.c om...
>I wonder if this engine you mention is similar to the 5.9 that was in the
>old Grand Wagoneer?
> Fred
>
>
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:V7SDf.32981$bF.21819@dukeread07...
>> RCSnyder did pass the time by typing:
>>> I'm remembring a road test of a Mopar Parts high performance intake
>>> manifold
>>> for the 5.9 Magnum engine but can't seem to recall where it was.
>>>
>>> The test installed the intake in a GC 5.9 and became a tire smoker as a
>>> result.
>>>
>>> Anyone recall the article and, more important, the part number?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Like this?
>> http://buymopar.com/store/magnum.html
>> half way down or there abouts. But it's not for your application.
>>
>> I'd write them and ask, if it's a Mopar HighPerformance part they would
>> know.
>>
>> --
>> DougW
>>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
"RCSnyder" <rcsnyder@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:P%eEf.44882$7S.39862@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> No relationship whatsoever. The old 360 is the AMC engine while this 5.9
> is pure Mopar.
and the difference is?
Guest
Posts: n/a
"RCSnyder" <rcsnyder@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:P%eEf.44882$7S.39862@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> No relationship whatsoever. The old 360 is the AMC engine while this 5.9
> is pure Mopar.
and the difference is?
Guest
Posts: n/a
"RCSnyder" <rcsnyder@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:P%eEf.44882$7S.39862@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> No relationship whatsoever. The old 360 is the AMC engine while this 5.9
> is pure Mopar.
and the difference is?
Guest
Posts: n/a
everything
Gazoo wrote:
> "RCSnyder" <rcsnyder@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:P%eEf.44882$7S.39862@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > No relationship whatsoever. The old 360 is the AMC engine while this 5.9
> > is pure Mopar.
>
> and the difference is?
Gazoo wrote:
> "RCSnyder" <rcsnyder@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:P%eEf.44882$7S.39862@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > No relationship whatsoever. The old 360 is the AMC engine while this 5.9
> > is pure Mopar.
>
> and the difference is?


