4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
11-15-2003, 11:29 AM
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
<bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
>options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only on the
4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available on a
TJ is 3.07.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
>options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only on the
4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available on a
TJ is 3.07.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
11-15-2003, 11:29 AM
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
<bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
>options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only on the
4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available on a
TJ is 3.07.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
>options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only on the
4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available on a
TJ is 3.07.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
11-15-2003, 12:03 PM
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
PMFBI, Matt's correct re: the TJ D44 standard ratio. The jump from that to
4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to no
more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of running
35's later on.
I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I opted
for 4.88's & 35's.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>
> >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
> >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
>
> The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only
on the
> 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available
on a
> TJ is 3.07.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to no
more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of running
35's later on.
I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I opted
for 4.88's & 35's.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>
> >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
> >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
>
> The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only
on the
> 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available
on a
> TJ is 3.07.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
11-15-2003, 12:03 PM
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
PMFBI, Matt's correct re: the TJ D44 standard ratio. The jump from that to
4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to no
more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of running
35's later on.
I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I opted
for 4.88's & 35's.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>
> >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
> >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
>
> The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only
on the
> 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available
on a
> TJ is 3.07.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to no
more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of running
35's later on.
I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I opted
for 4.88's & 35's.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>
> >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
> >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
>
> The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only
on the
> 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available
on a
> TJ is 3.07.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
11-15-2003, 12:03 PM
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
PMFBI, Matt's correct re: the TJ D44 standard ratio. The jump from that to
4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to no
more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of running
35's later on.
I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I opted
for 4.88's & 35's.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>
> >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
> >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
>
> The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only
on the
> 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available
on a
> TJ is 3.07.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
4:10's is fairly minor and might not be worth it if you're sticking to no
more than 33's, especially with an automatic. For the money, if you're
heading lower just go to 4.56's, which would give you the option of running
35's later on.
I ran 33's & 4.10's on the std axles in my '94 YJ manual trans and found
them very well matched. When I upgraded the axles and added lockers I opted
for 4.88's & 35's.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031115112945.02537.00001574@mb-m23.aol.com...
> In article <vrb2f8pakbg33f@corp.supernews.com>, "Bob Ackley"
> <bobackley@charter.net@NOSPAM> writes:
>
> >Forgive my lack of TJ knowledge, but if yours has the D44 rear end, your
> >options also include what I refer to as the "forgotten" ratio, 4.27.
>
> The ratio with the TJ factory Dana 44 is 3.73. 4.10's are available only
on the
> 4-cyl models and the Rubicon. The only other ratio I am aware of available
on a
> TJ is 3.07.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
11-15-2003, 12:12 PM
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
All added up for both axles including parts and labor, plan on anywhere from
around $1100 to maybe $1300. My last swap was just under $1100 but that's
not real common, at least here in SOCAL.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
To email, remove 'me' from my email address
KC6TAY, PP-ASEL
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Dennis Croll" <dcportland@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iFrtb.6596$Dw6.43523@attbi_s02...
> I was wondering about what it would cost to change front and back to 410's
> from a shop.
>
> "JimG" <jimg@cj7.com> wrote in message
> news:be4tb.11383$S05.7755@news01.roc.ny...
> > The 4.10's would be a good choice, especially with the 32's.
> >
> > --
> > JimG
> > 80' CJ-7, 258 CID
> > 35" BFG MT's on 15x10 Centerlines
> > 4.56 D30-D44 SOA
> > D300 w/4:1 & Currie twin sticks
> > Warn 8000i w/dual batteries
> > LockRight F&R
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> > news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me;
I'm
> > > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
> maybe
> > > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
> don't
> > > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> > >
> > > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> > >
> > > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> > >
> > > -jeff
> >
> >
>
around $1100 to maybe $1300. My last swap was just under $1100 but that's
not real common, at least here in SOCAL.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
To email, remove 'me' from my email address
KC6TAY, PP-ASEL
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Dennis Croll" <dcportland@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iFrtb.6596$Dw6.43523@attbi_s02...
> I was wondering about what it would cost to change front and back to 410's
> from a shop.
>
> "JimG" <jimg@cj7.com> wrote in message
> news:be4tb.11383$S05.7755@news01.roc.ny...
> > The 4.10's would be a good choice, especially with the 32's.
> >
> > --
> > JimG
> > 80' CJ-7, 258 CID
> > 35" BFG MT's on 15x10 Centerlines
> > 4.56 D30-D44 SOA
> > D300 w/4:1 & Currie twin sticks
> > Warn 8000i w/dual batteries
> > LockRight F&R
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> > news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me;
I'm
> > > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
> maybe
> > > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
> don't
> > > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> > >
> > > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> > >
> > > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> > >
> > > -jeff
> >
> >
>
11-15-2003, 12:12 PM
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
All added up for both axles including parts and labor, plan on anywhere from
around $1100 to maybe $1300. My last swap was just under $1100 but that's
not real common, at least here in SOCAL.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
To email, remove 'me' from my email address
KC6TAY, PP-ASEL
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Dennis Croll" <dcportland@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iFrtb.6596$Dw6.43523@attbi_s02...
> I was wondering about what it would cost to change front and back to 410's
> from a shop.
>
> "JimG" <jimg@cj7.com> wrote in message
> news:be4tb.11383$S05.7755@news01.roc.ny...
> > The 4.10's would be a good choice, especially with the 32's.
> >
> > --
> > JimG
> > 80' CJ-7, 258 CID
> > 35" BFG MT's on 15x10 Centerlines
> > 4.56 D30-D44 SOA
> > D300 w/4:1 & Currie twin sticks
> > Warn 8000i w/dual batteries
> > LockRight F&R
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> > news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me;
I'm
> > > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
> maybe
> > > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
> don't
> > > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> > >
> > > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> > >
> > > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> > >
> > > -jeff
> >
> >
>
around $1100 to maybe $1300. My last swap was just under $1100 but that's
not real common, at least here in SOCAL.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
To email, remove 'me' from my email address
KC6TAY, PP-ASEL
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Dennis Croll" <dcportland@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iFrtb.6596$Dw6.43523@attbi_s02...
> I was wondering about what it would cost to change front and back to 410's
> from a shop.
>
> "JimG" <jimg@cj7.com> wrote in message
> news:be4tb.11383$S05.7755@news01.roc.ny...
> > The 4.10's would be a good choice, especially with the 32's.
> >
> > --
> > JimG
> > 80' CJ-7, 258 CID
> > 35" BFG MT's on 15x10 Centerlines
> > 4.56 D30-D44 SOA
> > D300 w/4:1 & Currie twin sticks
> > Warn 8000i w/dual batteries
> > LockRight F&R
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> > news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me;
I'm
> > > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
> maybe
> > > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
> don't
> > > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> > >
> > > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> > >
> > > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> > >
> > > -jeff
> >
> >
>
11-15-2003, 12:12 PM
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
All added up for both axles including parts and labor, plan on anywhere from
around $1100 to maybe $1300. My last swap was just under $1100 but that's
not real common, at least here in SOCAL.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
To email, remove 'me' from my email address
KC6TAY, PP-ASEL
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Dennis Croll" <dcportland@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iFrtb.6596$Dw6.43523@attbi_s02...
> I was wondering about what it would cost to change front and back to 410's
> from a shop.
>
> "JimG" <jimg@cj7.com> wrote in message
> news:be4tb.11383$S05.7755@news01.roc.ny...
> > The 4.10's would be a good choice, especially with the 32's.
> >
> > --
> > JimG
> > 80' CJ-7, 258 CID
> > 35" BFG MT's on 15x10 Centerlines
> > 4.56 D30-D44 SOA
> > D300 w/4:1 & Currie twin sticks
> > Warn 8000i w/dual batteries
> > LockRight F&R
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> > news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me;
I'm
> > > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
> maybe
> > > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
> don't
> > > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> > >
> > > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> > >
> > > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> > >
> > > -jeff
> >
> >
>
around $1100 to maybe $1300. My last swap was just under $1100 but that's
not real common, at least here in SOCAL.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
To email, remove 'me' from my email address
KC6TAY, PP-ASEL
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Dennis Croll" <dcportland@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iFrtb.6596$Dw6.43523@attbi_s02...
> I was wondering about what it would cost to change front and back to 410's
> from a shop.
>
> "JimG" <jimg@cj7.com> wrote in message
> news:be4tb.11383$S05.7755@news01.roc.ny...
> > The 4.10's would be a good choice, especially with the 32's.
> >
> > --
> > JimG
> > 80' CJ-7, 258 CID
> > 35" BFG MT's on 15x10 Centerlines
> > 4.56 D30-D44 SOA
> > D300 w/4:1 & Currie twin sticks
> > Warn 8000i w/dual batteries
> > LockRight F&R
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> > news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me;
I'm
> > > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
> maybe
> > > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
> don't
> > > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> > >
> > > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> > >
> > > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> > >
> > > -jeff
> >
> >
>
11-17-2003, 02:43 PM
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
I'll second this Nathan......
dave
"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
news:JG7tb.760$C14.58061@twister.southeast.rr.com. ..
> my rubicon runs 31s on 4.10 and i find it to be the perfect ratio for the
> 4.0. if i want to i can pull away from most hondas at the stop light, and
> thanks to the overdrive its perfectly at home at 80mph. i wont even get
> into how awesome it is off road.
> i like:
> 30" - 3.73
> 31"/32" - 4.10
> 33" - 4.56
> 35" - 4.88
> 36"/37" - 4.10/4.56 w/ v8 swap
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
>
>
> "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me; I'm
> > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
maybe
> > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
don't
> > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> >
> > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> >
> > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> >
> > -jeff
>
>
dave
"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
news:JG7tb.760$C14.58061@twister.southeast.rr.com. ..
> my rubicon runs 31s on 4.10 and i find it to be the perfect ratio for the
> 4.0. if i want to i can pull away from most hondas at the stop light, and
> thanks to the overdrive its perfectly at home at 80mph. i wont even get
> into how awesome it is off road.
> i like:
> 30" - 3.73
> 31"/32" - 4.10
> 33" - 4.56
> 35" - 4.88
> 36"/37" - 4.10/4.56 w/ v8 swap
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
>
>
> "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me; I'm
> > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
maybe
> > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
don't
> > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> >
> > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> >
> > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> >
> > -jeff
>
>
11-17-2003, 02:43 PM
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.10 best general-purpose gear ratio?
I'll second this Nathan......
dave
"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
news:JG7tb.760$C14.58061@twister.southeast.rr.com. ..
> my rubicon runs 31s on 4.10 and i find it to be the perfect ratio for the
> 4.0. if i want to i can pull away from most hondas at the stop light, and
> thanks to the overdrive its perfectly at home at 80mph. i wont even get
> into how awesome it is off road.
> i like:
> 30" - 3.73
> 31"/32" - 4.10
> 33" - 4.56
> 35" - 4.88
> 36"/37" - 4.10/4.56 w/ v8 swap
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
>
>
> "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me; I'm
> > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
maybe
> > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
don't
> > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> >
> > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> >
> > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> >
> > -jeff
>
>
dave
"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
news:JG7tb.760$C14.58061@twister.southeast.rr.com. ..
> my rubicon runs 31s on 4.10 and i find it to be the perfect ratio for the
> 4.0. if i want to i can pull away from most hondas at the stop light, and
> thanks to the overdrive its perfectly at home at 80mph. i wont even get
> into how awesome it is off road.
> i like:
> 30" - 3.73
> 31"/32" - 4.10
> 33" - 4.56
> 35" - 4.88
> 36"/37" - 4.10/4.56 w/ v8 swap
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
>
>
> "Jeff Olsen" <jeffo@efn.org> wrote in message
> news:bp25a3$cra@garcia.efn.org...
> > I think I'm going to start buying parts to get my TJ regeared from the
> > dreaded 3.07 that I have now. I THINK that 4.10 makes sense for me; I'm
> > not planning on going with huge tires or lifts. Most likely 31's or
maybe
> > 32's. I know with 31's I'd be a little low-geared but that's OK; i
don't
> > need to go faster than 75 mph in this vehicle.
> >
> > Vehicle is a 4.0L TJ, 5-speed tranny.
> >
> > So... would you all agree that 4.10 is the way to go?
> >
> > -jeff
>
>