4.0L vs. 3.7L
#91
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.0L vs. 3.7L
I LOVE the fact that they have this engine! Altho I'll miss that
traditional Jeep I-6 4.0 chugg it used to make, (I owned 4 of them) I
still have my 4.2 CJ-7 to keep me comforted while driving around town.
If I had all the cash in the world, I'd yank the 3.7 and drop that 4.7
in it in a minute!
Think of all that low end power torque and all those horses. You'd
probly be able to break that coveted 103 mph! (At least that's all my
2000 Sport could muster)
traditional Jeep I-6 4.0 chugg it used to make, (I owned 4 of them) I
still have my 4.2 CJ-7 to keep me comforted while driving around town.
If I had all the cash in the world, I'd yank the 3.7 and drop that 4.7
in it in a minute!
Think of all that low end power torque and all those horses. You'd
probly be able to break that coveted 103 mph! (At least that's all my
2000 Sport could muster)
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.0L vs. 3.7L
"JeepGuyMike" <jeepguymike@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1152187102.770754.242310@b68g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
You'd
> probly be able to break that coveted 103 mph! (At least that's all my
> 2000 Sport could muster)
You really should be using low range on trails. :-)
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.0L vs. 3.7L
"JeepGuyMike" <jeepguymike@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1152187102.770754.242310@b68g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
You'd
> probly be able to break that coveted 103 mph! (At least that's all my
> 2000 Sport could muster)
You really should be using low range on trails. :-)
#94
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.0L vs. 3.7L
"JeepGuyMike" <jeepguymike@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1152187102.770754.242310@b68g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
You'd
> probly be able to break that coveted 103 mph! (At least that's all my
> 2000 Sport could muster)
You really should be using low range on trails. :-)
#95
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.0L vs. 3.7L
It is important to choose the correct gear and speed for the hill:
http://www.----------.com/temp/hillClimbSave.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> You really should be using low range on trails. :-)
http://www.----------.com/temp/hillClimbSave.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> You really should be using low range on trails. :-)
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.0L vs. 3.7L
It is important to choose the correct gear and speed for the hill:
http://www.----------.com/temp/hillClimbSave.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> You really should be using low range on trails. :-)
http://www.----------.com/temp/hillClimbSave.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> You really should be using low range on trails. :-)
#97
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.0L vs. 3.7L
It is important to choose the correct gear and speed for the hill:
http://www.----------.com/temp/hillClimbSave.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> You really should be using low range on trails. :-)
http://www.----------.com/temp/hillClimbSave.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> You really should be using low range on trails. :-)