33x9.5 on TJ
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33x9.5 on TJ
"odd" is in the eye of the beholder... And after running my 33x12.5's on my
last CJ, I'm wanting to try something a little less pontoon like
(particularly when the tread got down to the last third)... For where I go
and what I do (not to mention the weather here in the lovely Saint John, NB
area) the tall and skinny will be a better choice...
Thanx
"Cherokee-LTD" <spammenot@home.com> wrote in message
news:FQsJb.94204$INs.4073@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> Not sure about turning radius but mount one tire and have a look at it
> before you commit to 33x9.5 tires on an 8 inch rim. They look super skinny
> on a 7 inch rim, it might look really odd on the 8. (if that matters)
> -Brian
>
> "Warren Quin" <wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:h4nJb.50756$IF6.1071414@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> : Does anyone know how much turning radius I would lose putting 33x9.5 BFG
> ATs
> : on a stock set of Canyon (15x8) rims (without a wheelspacer) assuming a
> : proper height adjustment?
> :
> : In other words, will it end up turning like an aircraft carrier?
> :
> : Thanx in advance for any input into this...
> :
> : Warren Quin
> : wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com
> : (Remove the "nospam" to reply)
> : 2000 TJ - Stock DD under construction
> : 78 CJ7 - sold
> : 80 CJ7 - sold
> : 95 Dodge RAM 4x4 - sold
> :
> :
>
>
last CJ, I'm wanting to try something a little less pontoon like
(particularly when the tread got down to the last third)... For where I go
and what I do (not to mention the weather here in the lovely Saint John, NB
area) the tall and skinny will be a better choice...
Thanx
"Cherokee-LTD" <spammenot@home.com> wrote in message
news:FQsJb.94204$INs.4073@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> Not sure about turning radius but mount one tire and have a look at it
> before you commit to 33x9.5 tires on an 8 inch rim. They look super skinny
> on a 7 inch rim, it might look really odd on the 8. (if that matters)
> -Brian
>
> "Warren Quin" <wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:h4nJb.50756$IF6.1071414@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> : Does anyone know how much turning radius I would lose putting 33x9.5 BFG
> ATs
> : on a stock set of Canyon (15x8) rims (without a wheelspacer) assuming a
> : proper height adjustment?
> :
> : In other words, will it end up turning like an aircraft carrier?
> :
> : Thanx in advance for any input into this...
> :
> : Warren Quin
> : wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com
> : (Remove the "nospam" to reply)
> : 2000 TJ - Stock DD under construction
> : 78 CJ7 - sold
> : 80 CJ7 - sold
> : 95 Dodge RAM 4x4 - sold
> :
> :
>
>
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33x9.5 on TJ
"odd" is in the eye of the beholder... And after running my 33x12.5's on my
last CJ, I'm wanting to try something a little less pontoon like
(particularly when the tread got down to the last third)... For where I go
and what I do (not to mention the weather here in the lovely Saint John, NB
area) the tall and skinny will be a better choice...
Thanx
"Cherokee-LTD" <spammenot@home.com> wrote in message
news:FQsJb.94204$INs.4073@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> Not sure about turning radius but mount one tire and have a look at it
> before you commit to 33x9.5 tires on an 8 inch rim. They look super skinny
> on a 7 inch rim, it might look really odd on the 8. (if that matters)
> -Brian
>
> "Warren Quin" <wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:h4nJb.50756$IF6.1071414@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> : Does anyone know how much turning radius I would lose putting 33x9.5 BFG
> ATs
> : on a stock set of Canyon (15x8) rims (without a wheelspacer) assuming a
> : proper height adjustment?
> :
> : In other words, will it end up turning like an aircraft carrier?
> :
> : Thanx in advance for any input into this...
> :
> : Warren Quin
> : wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com
> : (Remove the "nospam" to reply)
> : 2000 TJ - Stock DD under construction
> : 78 CJ7 - sold
> : 80 CJ7 - sold
> : 95 Dodge RAM 4x4 - sold
> :
> :
>
>
last CJ, I'm wanting to try something a little less pontoon like
(particularly when the tread got down to the last third)... For where I go
and what I do (not to mention the weather here in the lovely Saint John, NB
area) the tall and skinny will be a better choice...
Thanx
"Cherokee-LTD" <spammenot@home.com> wrote in message
news:FQsJb.94204$INs.4073@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> Not sure about turning radius but mount one tire and have a look at it
> before you commit to 33x9.5 tires on an 8 inch rim. They look super skinny
> on a 7 inch rim, it might look really odd on the 8. (if that matters)
> -Brian
>
> "Warren Quin" <wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:h4nJb.50756$IF6.1071414@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> : Does anyone know how much turning radius I would lose putting 33x9.5 BFG
> ATs
> : on a stock set of Canyon (15x8) rims (without a wheelspacer) assuming a
> : proper height adjustment?
> :
> : In other words, will it end up turning like an aircraft carrier?
> :
> : Thanx in advance for any input into this...
> :
> : Warren Quin
> : wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com
> : (Remove the "nospam" to reply)
> : 2000 TJ - Stock DD under construction
> : 78 CJ7 - sold
> : 80 CJ7 - sold
> : 95 Dodge RAM 4x4 - sold
> :
> :
>
>
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33x9.5 on TJ
"odd" is in the eye of the beholder... And after running my 33x12.5's on my
last CJ, I'm wanting to try something a little less pontoon like
(particularly when the tread got down to the last third)... For where I go
and what I do (not to mention the weather here in the lovely Saint John, NB
area) the tall and skinny will be a better choice...
Thanx
"Cherokee-LTD" <spammenot@home.com> wrote in message
news:FQsJb.94204$INs.4073@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> Not sure about turning radius but mount one tire and have a look at it
> before you commit to 33x9.5 tires on an 8 inch rim. They look super skinny
> on a 7 inch rim, it might look really odd on the 8. (if that matters)
> -Brian
>
> "Warren Quin" <wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:h4nJb.50756$IF6.1071414@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> : Does anyone know how much turning radius I would lose putting 33x9.5 BFG
> ATs
> : on a stock set of Canyon (15x8) rims (without a wheelspacer) assuming a
> : proper height adjustment?
> :
> : In other words, will it end up turning like an aircraft carrier?
> :
> : Thanx in advance for any input into this...
> :
> : Warren Quin
> : wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com
> : (Remove the "nospam" to reply)
> : 2000 TJ - Stock DD under construction
> : 78 CJ7 - sold
> : 80 CJ7 - sold
> : 95 Dodge RAM 4x4 - sold
> :
> :
>
>
last CJ, I'm wanting to try something a little less pontoon like
(particularly when the tread got down to the last third)... For where I go
and what I do (not to mention the weather here in the lovely Saint John, NB
area) the tall and skinny will be a better choice...
Thanx
"Cherokee-LTD" <spammenot@home.com> wrote in message
news:FQsJb.94204$INs.4073@twister01.bloor.is.net.c able.rogers.com...
> Not sure about turning radius but mount one tire and have a look at it
> before you commit to 33x9.5 tires on an 8 inch rim. They look super skinny
> on a 7 inch rim, it might look really odd on the 8. (if that matters)
> -Brian
>
> "Warren Quin" <wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:h4nJb.50756$IF6.1071414@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> : Does anyone know how much turning radius I would lose putting 33x9.5 BFG
> ATs
> : on a stock set of Canyon (15x8) rims (without a wheelspacer) assuming a
> : proper height adjustment?
> :
> : In other words, will it end up turning like an aircraft carrier?
> :
> : Thanx in advance for any input into this...
> :
> : Warren Quin
> : wquin@bigfoot.nospam.com
> : (Remove the "nospam" to reply)
> : 2000 TJ - Stock DD under construction
> : 78 CJ7 - sold
> : 80 CJ7 - sold
> : 95 Dodge RAM 4x4 - sold
> :
> :
>
>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)