2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
Joseph P did pass the time by typing:
> Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> the mall the other day....
Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
went digital.
--
DougW
> Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> the mall the other day....
Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
went digital.
--
DougW
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
Joseph P did pass the time by typing:
> Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> the mall the other day....
Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
went digital.
--
DougW
> Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> the mall the other day....
Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
went digital.
--
DougW
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
Joseph P did pass the time by typing:
> Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> the mall the other day....
Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
went digital.
--
DougW
> Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> the mall the other day....
Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
went digital.
--
DougW
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:L%adc.153$fS6.112@okepread01...
> Joseph P did pass the time by typing:
> > Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> > the mall the other day....
>
> Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
>
> No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
> went digital.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
You are right, missing gauges too!
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:L%adc.153$fS6.112@okepread01...
> Joseph P did pass the time by typing:
> > Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> > the mall the other day....
>
> Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
>
> No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
> went digital.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
You are right, missing gauges too!
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:L%adc.153$fS6.112@okepread01...
> Joseph P did pass the time by typing:
> > Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> > the mall the other day....
>
> Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
>
> No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
> went digital.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
You are right, missing gauges too!
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:L%adc.153$fS6.112@okepread01...
> Joseph P did pass the time by typing:
> > Yup, looks terrible...very much like that Volvo SUV thingy I saw at
> > the mall the other day....
>
> Get this.. Finally looked at all the pictures.
>
> No water temp or oil pressure gauge. Unless they
> went digital.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
You are right, missing gauges too!
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
Chad Fraker did pass the time by typing:
> I guess the thing that disappointed me was the IFS.
> http://tinyurl.com/373dn
Mixed emotions on that.
On one hand that means a less rugged front axle, but
on the other, no deathwobble.
--
DougW
> I guess the thing that disappointed me was the IFS.
> http://tinyurl.com/373dn
Mixed emotions on that.
On one hand that means a less rugged front axle, but
on the other, no deathwobble.
--
DougW
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
Chad Fraker did pass the time by typing:
> I guess the thing that disappointed me was the IFS.
> http://tinyurl.com/373dn
Mixed emotions on that.
On one hand that means a less rugged front axle, but
on the other, no deathwobble.
--
DougW
> I guess the thing that disappointed me was the IFS.
> http://tinyurl.com/373dn
Mixed emotions on that.
On one hand that means a less rugged front axle, but
on the other, no deathwobble.
--
DougW
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Grand Cherokee Opinion
Chad Fraker did pass the time by typing:
> I guess the thing that disappointed me was the IFS.
> http://tinyurl.com/373dn
Mixed emotions on that.
On one hand that means a less rugged front axle, but
on the other, no deathwobble.
--
DougW
> I guess the thing that disappointed me was the IFS.
> http://tinyurl.com/373dn
Mixed emotions on that.
On one hand that means a less rugged front axle, but
on the other, no deathwobble.
--
DougW