2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
04-13-2004, 10:24 PM
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
group for a long time know this.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
group for a long time know this.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
04-13-2004, 10:35 PM
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
While I'm not saying there is no intended trolling on Bill's part
regarding this topic, he hasn't altered DC's design direction. That _IS_
their concept and suggested replacement for the TJ, sad and undesireable
as it may be. Highly unlikey it will be a 2005...so stock up on TJs
while you can!
Brian wrote:
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
> group for a long time know this.
>
> B
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
regarding this topic, he hasn't altered DC's design direction. That _IS_
their concept and suggested replacement for the TJ, sad and undesireable
as it may be. Highly unlikey it will be a 2005...so stock up on TJs
while you can!
Brian wrote:
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
> group for a long time know this.
>
> B
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
04-13-2004, 10:35 PM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
While I'm not saying there is no intended trolling on Bill's part
regarding this topic, he hasn't altered DC's design direction. That _IS_
their concept and suggested replacement for the TJ, sad and undesireable
as it may be. Highly unlikey it will be a 2005...so stock up on TJs
while you can!
Brian wrote:
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
> group for a long time know this.
>
> B
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
regarding this topic, he hasn't altered DC's design direction. That _IS_
their concept and suggested replacement for the TJ, sad and undesireable
as it may be. Highly unlikey it will be a 2005...so stock up on TJs
while you can!
Brian wrote:
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
> group for a long time know this.
>
> B
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
04-13-2004, 10:35 PM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
While I'm not saying there is no intended trolling on Bill's part
regarding this topic, he hasn't altered DC's design direction. That _IS_
their concept and suggested replacement for the TJ, sad and undesireable
as it may be. Highly unlikey it will be a 2005...so stock up on TJs
while you can!
Brian wrote:
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
> group for a long time know this.
>
> B
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
regarding this topic, he hasn't altered DC's design direction. That _IS_
their concept and suggested replacement for the TJ, sad and undesireable
as it may be. Highly unlikey it will be a 2005...so stock up on TJs
while you can!
Brian wrote:
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
> group for a long time know this.
>
> B
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
04-13-2004, 10:35 PM
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
While I'm not saying there is no intended trolling on Bill's part
regarding this topic, he hasn't altered DC's design direction. That _IS_
their concept and suggested replacement for the TJ, sad and undesireable
as it may be. Highly unlikey it will be a 2005...so stock up on TJs
while you can!
Brian wrote:
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
> group for a long time know this.
>
> B
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
regarding this topic, he hasn't altered DC's design direction. That _IS_
their concept and suggested replacement for the TJ, sad and undesireable
as it may be. Highly unlikey it will be a 2005...so stock up on TJs
while you can!
Brian wrote:
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll. Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction. Those who have frequented this
> group for a long time know this.
>
> B
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
04-13-2004, 10:36 PM
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-6E1E22.22345113042004@news.verizon.net...
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll.
look at the icon. http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/icon.html
look at the ****** http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/******.html
surely you dont think these were designed to be sold along side the
wrangler? both are the most recent concepts as viable replacements for the
SWB jeep. both have IFS. both have IRS. both clearly show the direction
that daimler chrysler intends to head.
> Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction.
you may disagree with what bill says......you may not like it.....but to
accuse him of trolling is just wrong and very misguided. right or wrong,
bill is an original hardcore jeeper who speaks with conviction for his
beliefs and i _respect_ that. bill is the antithesis of a troll.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:b_heller-6E1E22.22345113042004@news.verizon.net...
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll.
look at the icon. http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/icon.html
look at the ****** http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/******.html
surely you dont think these were designed to be sold along side the
wrangler? both are the most recent concepts as viable replacements for the
SWB jeep. both have IFS. both have IRS. both clearly show the direction
that daimler chrysler intends to head.
> Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction.
you may disagree with what bill says......you may not like it.....but to
accuse him of trolling is just wrong and very misguided. right or wrong,
bill is an original hardcore jeeper who speaks with conviction for his
beliefs and i _respect_ that. bill is the antithesis of a troll.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
04-13-2004, 10:36 PM
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-6E1E22.22345113042004@news.verizon.net...
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll.
look at the icon. http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/icon.html
look at the ****** http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/******.html
surely you dont think these were designed to be sold along side the
wrangler? both are the most recent concepts as viable replacements for the
SWB jeep. both have IFS. both have IRS. both clearly show the direction
that daimler chrysler intends to head.
> Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction.
you may disagree with what bill says......you may not like it.....but to
accuse him of trolling is just wrong and very misguided. right or wrong,
bill is an original hardcore jeeper who speaks with conviction for his
beliefs and i _respect_ that. bill is the antithesis of a troll.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:b_heller-6E1E22.22345113042004@news.verizon.net...
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll.
look at the icon. http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/icon.html
look at the ****** http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/******.html
surely you dont think these were designed to be sold along side the
wrangler? both are the most recent concepts as viable replacements for the
SWB jeep. both have IFS. both have IRS. both clearly show the direction
that daimler chrysler intends to head.
> Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction.
you may disagree with what bill says......you may not like it.....but to
accuse him of trolling is just wrong and very misguided. right or wrong,
bill is an original hardcore jeeper who speaks with conviction for his
beliefs and i _respect_ that. bill is the antithesis of a troll.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
04-13-2004, 10:36 PM
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-6E1E22.22345113042004@news.verizon.net...
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll.
look at the icon. http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/icon.html
look at the ****** http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/******.html
surely you dont think these were designed to be sold along side the
wrangler? both are the most recent concepts as viable replacements for the
SWB jeep. both have IFS. both have IRS. both clearly show the direction
that daimler chrysler intends to head.
> Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction.
you may disagree with what bill says......you may not like it.....but to
accuse him of trolling is just wrong and very misguided. right or wrong,
bill is an original hardcore jeeper who speaks with conviction for his
beliefs and i _respect_ that. bill is the antithesis of a troll.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:b_heller-6E1E22.22345113042004@news.verizon.net...
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll.
look at the icon. http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/icon.html
look at the ****** http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/******.html
surely you dont think these were designed to be sold along side the
wrangler? both are the most recent concepts as viable replacements for the
SWB jeep. both have IFS. both have IRS. both clearly show the direction
that daimler chrysler intends to head.
> Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction.
you may disagree with what bill says......you may not like it.....but to
accuse him of trolling is just wrong and very misguided. right or wrong,
bill is an original hardcore jeeper who speaks with conviction for his
beliefs and i _respect_ that. bill is the antithesis of a troll.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
04-13-2004, 10:36 PM
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-6E1E22.22345113042004@news.verizon.net...
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll.
look at the icon. http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/icon.html
look at the ****** http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/******.html
surely you dont think these were designed to be sold along side the
wrangler? both are the most recent concepts as viable replacements for the
SWB jeep. both have IFS. both have IRS. both clearly show the direction
that daimler chrysler intends to head.
> Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction.
you may disagree with what bill says......you may not like it.....but to
accuse him of trolling is just wrong and very misguided. right or wrong,
bill is an original hardcore jeeper who speaks with conviction for his
beliefs and i _respect_ that. bill is the antithesis of a troll.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:b_heller-6E1E22.22345113042004@news.verizon.net...
> Considering that we don't really know what 2005 has in store for
> Wrangler (aside from the stretched model), the picture that Bill keeps
> posting is nothing other than a troll.
look at the icon. http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/icon.html
look at the ****** http://7slotgrille.com/gbu/******.html
surely you dont think these were designed to be sold along side the
wrangler? both are the most recent concepts as viable replacements for the
SWB jeep. both have IFS. both have IRS. both clearly show the direction
that daimler chrysler intends to head.
> Bill is a troll, at least as far
> as discussing Daimler's design direction.
you may disagree with what bill says......you may not like it.....but to
accuse him of trolling is just wrong and very misguided. right or wrong,
bill is an original hardcore jeeper who speaks with conviction for his
beliefs and i _respect_ that. bill is the antithesis of a troll.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
04-13-2004, 11:16 PM
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2004 vs 2005 [Rubicon]
The YJ is called a Wrangler.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> I didn't notice Jeep's name changing to Le Jeep when it was owned by the
> French when the YJ was designed.
>
> Jerry
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> To email, remove 'me' from my email address
> N6TAY, PP-ASEL
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> I didn't notice Jeep's name changing to Le Jeep when it was owned by the
> French when the YJ was designed.
>
> Jerry
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> To email, remove 'me' from my email address
> N6TAY, PP-ASEL
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/