|
Re: Is 2000-2002 Cherokee relaible
In article <SpUxb.25204$Eq1.2115774@news20.bellglobal.com>,
Herb Wu <haizhong_email@yahoo.com> wrote: >I am gonna to buy a Cherokee (Not Grand Cherokee) for Canada's winter, just >love the classic style. I prefer a 2000 or later. Are they still as good as >91 or older model? I hope it is relaible and last longer. > >thanks > >Herb The 2000 and up Cherokee Sports are pretty nice. So nice they stopped making them because the Krauts where afraid that it would rob the Libby's market share. DumbA$$es... -- <html><form><input type crash></form></html> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail |
Re: Is 2000-2002 Cherokee relaible
In article <SpUxb.25204$Eq1.2115774@news20.bellglobal.com>,
Herb Wu <haizhong_email@yahoo.com> wrote: >I am gonna to buy a Cherokee (Not Grand Cherokee) for Canada's winter, just >love the classic style. I prefer a 2000 or later. Are they still as good as >91 or older model? I hope it is relaible and last longer. > >thanks > >Herb The 2000 and up Cherokee Sports are pretty nice. So nice they stopped making them because the Krauts where afraid that it would rob the Libby's market share. DumbA$$es... -- <html><form><input type crash></form></html> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail |
Re: Is 2000-2002 Cherokee relaible
In article <SpUxb.25204$Eq1.2115774@news20.bellglobal.com>,
Herb Wu <haizhong_email@yahoo.com> wrote: >I am gonna to buy a Cherokee (Not Grand Cherokee) for Canada's winter, just >love the classic style. I prefer a 2000 or later. Are they still as good as >91 or older model? I hope it is relaible and last longer. > >thanks > >Herb The 2000 and up Cherokee Sports are pretty nice. So nice they stopped making them because the Krauts where afraid that it would rob the Libby's market share. DumbA$$es... -- <html><form><input type crash></form></html> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail |
Is 2000-2002 Cherokee relaible
I am gonna to buy a Cherokee (Not Grand Cherokee) for Canada's winter, just
love the classic style. I prefer a 2000 or later. Are they still as good as 91 or older model? I hope it is relaible and last longer. thanks Herb |
Re: Is 2000-2002 Cherokee relaible
>I am gonna to buy a Cherokee (Not Grand Cherokee) for Canada's winter, just
>love the classic style. I prefer a 2000 or later. Are they still as good as >91 or older model? I hope it is relaible and last longer. > I think Daimler-Chrysler did a lot of cheapening over the years. We'll see whether that affects long term reliablity. The newer ones are certainly more refined ergonomically than the older ones. Whether that's a plus or minus is up to you. I like the look of my '93 better than the more car-like look of the newer ones, but on the other hand the climate controls are primitive and the window/lock controls are very hard to operate in the dark... -- Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>> Bloomington, MN to email, remove the "q" from my address |
Re: Is 2000-2002 Cherokee relaible
>I am gonna to buy a Cherokee (Not Grand Cherokee) for Canada's winter, just
>love the classic style. I prefer a 2000 or later. Are they still as good as >91 or older model? I hope it is relaible and last longer. > I think Daimler-Chrysler did a lot of cheapening over the years. We'll see whether that affects long term reliablity. The newer ones are certainly more refined ergonomically than the older ones. Whether that's a plus or minus is up to you. I like the look of my '93 better than the more car-like look of the newer ones, but on the other hand the climate controls are primitive and the window/lock controls are very hard to operate in the dark... -- Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>> Bloomington, MN to email, remove the "q" from my address |
Re: Is 2000-2002 Cherokee relaible
>I am gonna to buy a Cherokee (Not Grand Cherokee) for Canada's winter, just
>love the classic style. I prefer a 2000 or later. Are they still as good as >91 or older model? I hope it is relaible and last longer. > I think Daimler-Chrysler did a lot of cheapening over the years. We'll see whether that affects long term reliablity. The newer ones are certainly more refined ergonomically than the older ones. Whether that's a plus or minus is up to you. I like the look of my '93 better than the more car-like look of the newer ones, but on the other hand the climate controls are primitive and the window/lock controls are very hard to operate in the dark... -- Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>> Bloomington, MN to email, remove the "q" from my address |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands