#2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
02-28-2004, 04:55 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Yes, .010
"through the babit"?
How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
Thanks,
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
"through the babit"?
How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
Thanks,
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
02-28-2004, 04:55 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Yes, .010
"through the babit"?
How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
Thanks,
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
"through the babit"?
How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
Thanks,
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
02-28-2004, 04:55 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Yes, .010
"through the babit"?
How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
Thanks,
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
"through the babit"?
How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
Thanks,
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
> >
> > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
02-28-2004, 05:11 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Oh, I think I get it. The worn area on the loose bearing is copper? I
didn't pick that up right away.
Now, what if others are "through the copper", what do you suggest?
Thanks,
Bill
I have 3 more pics. Two of the piston without rings (both sides) and the
rings separate.
I left these at a higher resolution to show detail (about 200k each).
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2c.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2d.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je...s/rings_2a.jpg
"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c1r2r4$1l7og3$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> > It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> > long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> > same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > William Oliveri wrote:
> > >
> > > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
>
>
didn't pick that up right away.
Now, what if others are "through the copper", what do you suggest?
Thanks,
Bill
I have 3 more pics. Two of the piston without rings (both sides) and the
rings separate.
I left these at a higher resolution to show detail (about 200k each).
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2c.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2d.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je...s/rings_2a.jpg
"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c1r2r4$1l7og3$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> > It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> > long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> > same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > William Oliveri wrote:
> > >
> > > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
>
>
02-28-2004, 05:11 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Oh, I think I get it. The worn area on the loose bearing is copper? I
didn't pick that up right away.
Now, what if others are "through the copper", what do you suggest?
Thanks,
Bill
I have 3 more pics. Two of the piston without rings (both sides) and the
rings separate.
I left these at a higher resolution to show detail (about 200k each).
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2c.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2d.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je...s/rings_2a.jpg
"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c1r2r4$1l7og3$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> > It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> > long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> > same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > William Oliveri wrote:
> > >
> > > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
>
>
didn't pick that up right away.
Now, what if others are "through the copper", what do you suggest?
Thanks,
Bill
I have 3 more pics. Two of the piston without rings (both sides) and the
rings separate.
I left these at a higher resolution to show detail (about 200k each).
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2c.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2d.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je...s/rings_2a.jpg
"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c1r2r4$1l7og3$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> > It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> > long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> > same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > William Oliveri wrote:
> > >
> > > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
>
>
02-28-2004, 05:11 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Oh, I think I get it. The worn area on the loose bearing is copper? I
didn't pick that up right away.
Now, what if others are "through the copper", what do you suggest?
Thanks,
Bill
I have 3 more pics. Two of the piston without rings (both sides) and the
rings separate.
I left these at a higher resolution to show detail (about 200k each).
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2c.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2d.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je...s/rings_2a.jpg
"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c1r2r4$1l7og3$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> > It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> > long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> > same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > William Oliveri wrote:
> > >
> > > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
>
>
didn't pick that up right away.
Now, what if others are "through the copper", what do you suggest?
Thanks,
Bill
I have 3 more pics. Two of the piston without rings (both sides) and the
rings separate.
I left these at a higher resolution to show detail (about 200k each).
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2c.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je.../piston_2d.jpg
http://members.bigvalley.net/wuji/je...s/rings_2a.jpg
"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c1r2r4$1l7og3$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:40410D39.CD5857C7@***.net...
> > It's though the babit, at least two hundred thousand miles. But as
> > long as none of the others are through the copper, then just buy the
> > same size inserts, what do they say on the back, .010?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > William Oliveri wrote:
> > >
> > > what's the problem with the rod bearings? What looks bad about them?
>
>
02-28-2004, 05:53 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Hi Bill,
You are color blind. Babit is the soft gray stuff we may mark with
our finger nail, that is plated to the copper plated insert.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
> Thanks,
You are color blind. Babit is the soft gray stuff we may mark with
our finger nail, that is plated to the copper plated insert.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
> Thanks,
02-28-2004, 05:53 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Hi Bill,
You are color blind. Babit is the soft gray stuff we may mark with
our finger nail, that is plated to the copper plated insert.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
> Thanks,
You are color blind. Babit is the soft gray stuff we may mark with
our finger nail, that is plated to the copper plated insert.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
> Thanks,
02-28-2004, 05:53 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Hi Bill,
You are color blind. Babit is the soft gray stuff we may mark with
our finger nail, that is plated to the copper plated insert.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
> Thanks,
You are color blind. Babit is the soft gray stuff we may mark with
our finger nail, that is plated to the copper plated insert.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Yes, .010
>
> "through the babit"?
>
> How can you tell they look "babitized"? Is it the thickness, wear?
>
> Also, there is one that is loose and the other that's attached to the rod.
> The one attached to the rod comes off, correct?
>
> Thanks,
02-28-2004, 05:56 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: #2 Piston Pics - Got it out!!! Need feedback
Same suggestion I have suggested, you pull one piston and you ring
and put bearings in them all.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Oh, I think I get it. The worn area on the loose bearing is copper? I
> didn't pick that up right away.
>
> Now, what if others are "through the copper", what do you suggest?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
and put bearings in them all.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Oh, I think I get it. The worn area on the loose bearing is copper? I
> didn't pick that up right away.
>
> Now, what if others are "through the copper", what do you suggest?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
