1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
09-15-2006, 07:20 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
We too have a '98 ZJ 5.9 Limited. Gas prices were higher when we bought it
than they are now. It is a 'weekend and trip' vehicle for us, not a daily
driver. Both of our daily beaters are Hondas.
It seems that middle grade gas might be OK but since our use of the beast is
limited we don't mind paying for premium.
FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower octane gas.
If you experiment with the different grades of gas I would appreciate
hearing your experiences.
Since I'm asking for your opinion, I would like to know about your shock
absorbers. I asked here about a month ago about what to put on my beast. I
went with the Edelbrock Performer IAS's. I am happy with them but only have
the originals to compare with. What shocks are on your ZJ? Do you like them?
Why / Why not?
Thanks,
dj
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns983F996ED713Exs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Ed" <dorlyed@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:1158322821.028781.232450@i3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com:
>
>>
>> bllsht wrote:
>>> In message
>>> <1158268539.893721.123660@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Ed"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >A few days ago I bought a '98 Grand Cherokee with 8Cyl 5.9 and
>>> >now I see that it might be necessary to use premium gas. Bad
>>> >news but is it true?
>>>
>>> The 5.9 came programmed to run premium, but can be reprogrammed
>>> to run on regular.
>>
>> Thanks to all who responded. I will use regular and see what
>> happens and the mention about reprogramming will take care of any
>> problem.
>
> The need for premium is determined by combustion chamber
> design and compression ratio, it would be more accurate to say it's
> designed rather than programmed. If you run regular the engine will
> knock, you won't know it because the knock sensors will retard the
> spark which will reduce gas mileage and performance. If you
> reprogram the computer to limit the spark advance (and there's no
> need to do so, that's exactly what the knock sensor will do for you)
> you'll accomplish the same thing, a loss of power and a reduction in
> gas mileage.
>
> Read Mike Romain's post where he says, "I run a tank of regular and
> see what happens. In my CJ7's case the sucker won't go over 65 mph,
> rattles like crap and only gets 250 miles per 76 liter tank on
> regular. When I switch to premium, 3rd gear will do 70+ mph, 4th
> buries the speedo and I don't have any urge to see what 5th will
> do. I then get 350 miles easy to a tank full."
>
> That may be a little more extreme that the results you'll have but
> you get the idea, you should run premium.
>
>
>
>
than they are now. It is a 'weekend and trip' vehicle for us, not a daily
driver. Both of our daily beaters are Hondas.
It seems that middle grade gas might be OK but since our use of the beast is
limited we don't mind paying for premium.
FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower octane gas.
If you experiment with the different grades of gas I would appreciate
hearing your experiences.
Since I'm asking for your opinion, I would like to know about your shock
absorbers. I asked here about a month ago about what to put on my beast. I
went with the Edelbrock Performer IAS's. I am happy with them but only have
the originals to compare with. What shocks are on your ZJ? Do you like them?
Why / Why not?
Thanks,
dj
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns983F996ED713Exs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Ed" <dorlyed@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:1158322821.028781.232450@i3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com:
>
>>
>> bllsht wrote:
>>> In message
>>> <1158268539.893721.123660@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Ed"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >A few days ago I bought a '98 Grand Cherokee with 8Cyl 5.9 and
>>> >now I see that it might be necessary to use premium gas. Bad
>>> >news but is it true?
>>>
>>> The 5.9 came programmed to run premium, but can be reprogrammed
>>> to run on regular.
>>
>> Thanks to all who responded. I will use regular and see what
>> happens and the mention about reprogramming will take care of any
>> problem.
>
> The need for premium is determined by combustion chamber
> design and compression ratio, it would be more accurate to say it's
> designed rather than programmed. If you run regular the engine will
> knock, you won't know it because the knock sensors will retard the
> spark which will reduce gas mileage and performance. If you
> reprogram the computer to limit the spark advance (and there's no
> need to do so, that's exactly what the knock sensor will do for you)
> you'll accomplish the same thing, a loss of power and a reduction in
> gas mileage.
>
> Read Mike Romain's post where he says, "I run a tank of regular and
> see what happens. In my CJ7's case the sucker won't go over 65 mph,
> rattles like crap and only gets 250 miles per 76 liter tank on
> regular. When I switch to premium, 3rd gear will do 70+ mph, 4th
> buries the speedo and I don't have any urge to see what 5th will
> do. I then get 350 miles easy to a tank full."
>
> That may be a little more extreme that the results you'll have but
> you get the idea, you should run premium.
>
>
>
>
09-15-2006, 07:20 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
We too have a '98 ZJ 5.9 Limited. Gas prices were higher when we bought it
than they are now. It is a 'weekend and trip' vehicle for us, not a daily
driver. Both of our daily beaters are Hondas.
It seems that middle grade gas might be OK but since our use of the beast is
limited we don't mind paying for premium.
FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower octane gas.
If you experiment with the different grades of gas I would appreciate
hearing your experiences.
Since I'm asking for your opinion, I would like to know about your shock
absorbers. I asked here about a month ago about what to put on my beast. I
went with the Edelbrock Performer IAS's. I am happy with them but only have
the originals to compare with. What shocks are on your ZJ? Do you like them?
Why / Why not?
Thanks,
dj
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns983F996ED713Exs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Ed" <dorlyed@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:1158322821.028781.232450@i3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com:
>
>>
>> bllsht wrote:
>>> In message
>>> <1158268539.893721.123660@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Ed"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >A few days ago I bought a '98 Grand Cherokee with 8Cyl 5.9 and
>>> >now I see that it might be necessary to use premium gas. Bad
>>> >news but is it true?
>>>
>>> The 5.9 came programmed to run premium, but can be reprogrammed
>>> to run on regular.
>>
>> Thanks to all who responded. I will use regular and see what
>> happens and the mention about reprogramming will take care of any
>> problem.
>
> The need for premium is determined by combustion chamber
> design and compression ratio, it would be more accurate to say it's
> designed rather than programmed. If you run regular the engine will
> knock, you won't know it because the knock sensors will retard the
> spark which will reduce gas mileage and performance. If you
> reprogram the computer to limit the spark advance (and there's no
> need to do so, that's exactly what the knock sensor will do for you)
> you'll accomplish the same thing, a loss of power and a reduction in
> gas mileage.
>
> Read Mike Romain's post where he says, "I run a tank of regular and
> see what happens. In my CJ7's case the sucker won't go over 65 mph,
> rattles like crap and only gets 250 miles per 76 liter tank on
> regular. When I switch to premium, 3rd gear will do 70+ mph, 4th
> buries the speedo and I don't have any urge to see what 5th will
> do. I then get 350 miles easy to a tank full."
>
> That may be a little more extreme that the results you'll have but
> you get the idea, you should run premium.
>
>
>
>
than they are now. It is a 'weekend and trip' vehicle for us, not a daily
driver. Both of our daily beaters are Hondas.
It seems that middle grade gas might be OK but since our use of the beast is
limited we don't mind paying for premium.
FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower octane gas.
If you experiment with the different grades of gas I would appreciate
hearing your experiences.
Since I'm asking for your opinion, I would like to know about your shock
absorbers. I asked here about a month ago about what to put on my beast. I
went with the Edelbrock Performer IAS's. I am happy with them but only have
the originals to compare with. What shocks are on your ZJ? Do you like them?
Why / Why not?
Thanks,
dj
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns983F996ED713Exs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Ed" <dorlyed@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:1158322821.028781.232450@i3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com:
>
>>
>> bllsht wrote:
>>> In message
>>> <1158268539.893721.123660@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Ed"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >A few days ago I bought a '98 Grand Cherokee with 8Cyl 5.9 and
>>> >now I see that it might be necessary to use premium gas. Bad
>>> >news but is it true?
>>>
>>> The 5.9 came programmed to run premium, but can be reprogrammed
>>> to run on regular.
>>
>> Thanks to all who responded. I will use regular and see what
>> happens and the mention about reprogramming will take care of any
>> problem.
>
> The need for premium is determined by combustion chamber
> design and compression ratio, it would be more accurate to say it's
> designed rather than programmed. If you run regular the engine will
> knock, you won't know it because the knock sensors will retard the
> spark which will reduce gas mileage and performance. If you
> reprogram the computer to limit the spark advance (and there's no
> need to do so, that's exactly what the knock sensor will do for you)
> you'll accomplish the same thing, a loss of power and a reduction in
> gas mileage.
>
> Read Mike Romain's post where he says, "I run a tank of regular and
> see what happens. In my CJ7's case the sucker won't go over 65 mph,
> rattles like crap and only gets 250 miles per 76 liter tank on
> regular. When I switch to premium, 3rd gear will do 70+ mph, 4th
> buries the speedo and I don't have any urge to see what 5th will
> do. I then get 350 miles easy to a tank full."
>
> That may be a little more extreme that the results you'll have but
> you get the idea, you should run premium.
>
>
>
>
09-16-2006, 11:43 AM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
"Doug" <nono@nono.com> wrote in
news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
> octane gas.
Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
It's probably cheaper to run premium.
Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
much less than the other means of lowering compression...
Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
runs on regular.
As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
> octane gas.
Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
It's probably cheaper to run premium.
Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
much less than the other means of lowering compression...
Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
runs on regular.
As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
09-16-2006, 11:43 AM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
"Doug" <nono@nono.com> wrote in
news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
> octane gas.
Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
It's probably cheaper to run premium.
Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
much less than the other means of lowering compression...
Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
runs on regular.
As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
> octane gas.
Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
It's probably cheaper to run premium.
Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
much less than the other means of lowering compression...
Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
runs on regular.
As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
09-16-2006, 11:43 AM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
"Doug" <nono@nono.com> wrote in
news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
> octane gas.
Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
It's probably cheaper to run premium.
Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
much less than the other means of lowering compression...
Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
runs on regular.
As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
> octane gas.
Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
It's probably cheaper to run premium.
Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
much less than the other means of lowering compression...
Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
runs on regular.
As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
09-16-2006, 01:18 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
My dad has one of those 'go-karts', and it is difficult for my mom and
sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
What lift do you have?
Wish you'd gotten something else?
Thoughts/comments?
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns984058AE91C8Fxs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Doug" <nono@nono.com> wrote in
> news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
>> octane gas.
>
> Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
> sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
> the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
>
> It's probably cheaper to run premium.
>
> Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
> the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
> different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
> to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
> head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
> much less than the other means of lowering compression...
>
> Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
> runs on regular.
>
> As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
> mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
> very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
>
>
>
sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
What lift do you have?
Wish you'd gotten something else?
Thoughts/comments?
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns984058AE91C8Fxs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Doug" <nono@nono.com> wrote in
> news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
>> octane gas.
>
> Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
> sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
> the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
>
> It's probably cheaper to run premium.
>
> Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
> the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
> different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
> to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
> head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
> much less than the other means of lowering compression...
>
> Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
> runs on regular.
>
> As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
> mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
> very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
>
>
>
09-16-2006, 01:18 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
My dad has one of those 'go-karts', and it is difficult for my mom and
sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
What lift do you have?
Wish you'd gotten something else?
Thoughts/comments?
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns984058AE91C8Fxs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Doug" <nono@nono.com> wrote in
> news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
>> octane gas.
>
> Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
> sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
> the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
>
> It's probably cheaper to run premium.
>
> Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
> the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
> different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
> to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
> head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
> much less than the other means of lowering compression...
>
> Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
> runs on regular.
>
> As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
> mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
> very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
>
>
>
sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
What lift do you have?
Wish you'd gotten something else?
Thoughts/comments?
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns984058AE91C8Fxs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Doug" <nono@nono.com> wrote in
> news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
>> octane gas.
>
> Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
> sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
> the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
>
> It's probably cheaper to run premium.
>
> Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
> the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
> different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
> to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
> head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
> much less than the other means of lowering compression...
>
> Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
> runs on regular.
>
> As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
> mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
> very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
>
>
>
09-16-2006, 01:18 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
My dad has one of those 'go-karts', and it is difficult for my mom and
sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
What lift do you have?
Wish you'd gotten something else?
Thoughts/comments?
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns984058AE91C8Fxs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Doug" <nono@nono.com> wrote in
> news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
>> octane gas.
>
> Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
> sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
> the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
>
> It's probably cheaper to run premium.
>
> Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
> the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
> different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
> to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
> head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
> much less than the other means of lowering compression...
>
> Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
> runs on regular.
>
> As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
> mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
> very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
>
>
>
sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
What lift do you have?
Wish you'd gotten something else?
Thoughts/comments?
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns984058AE91C8Fxs11eyahoocom@70.168.83.30...
> "Doug" <nono@nono.com> wrote in
> news:AfmdnVf8_57eqJbYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>> FWIW I was told that the computer can be programmed for lower
>> octane gas.
>
> Correct, but as I said, it's a waste of time and money. The knock
> sensor will do exactly the same thing, retard the spark with exactly
> the same results, less performance and less gas mileage.
>
> It's probably cheaper to run premium.
>
> Some engines have low compression kits available for them, I'm not sure
> the 5.9 is one of them. They may consist of low compression pistons or
> different cylinder heads which are VERY costly and it would take years
> to make up the cost in savings on gas price or there may be thicker
> head gaskets available, still costly because of the labor involved but
> much less than the other means of lowering compression...
>
> Again, it's cheaper to run premium and make sure your *next* vehicle
> runs on regular.
>
> As for shocks, I have a lift mounted on the back of my Jeep to carry a
> mobility scooter so I needed to get air adjustable rear shocks, that
> very much limited my choice, I just got what was cheap.
>
>
>
09-16-2006, 01:54 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lift, was: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in
news:6b73f$450c32d1$422afc51$31650@FUSE.NET:
> My dad has one of those 'go-karts', and it is difficult for my mom
> and sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
I know, I tried that for some time, finally gave up as my arthritis got
worse and got the lift.
> What lift do you have?
I bought mine used and added the swing away option (it also was second
hand).
http://www.worldwide-mobility.com/
Mine is the same as the current Ultra model but does not have the
automatic tilt feature, that's not a problem because there's more than
enough clearance.
> Wish you'd gotten something else?
No, I'm pretty happy with it and I've compared it to others that I
don't like as well because of cheaper construction, less convenience,
etc. Note, these are personal opinions.
> Thoughts/comments?
Thought: I'd like some potato chips to go with watching football on TV,
you got any?
Comment: There's lots of ways to carry a scooter, the outside lift such
as mine is far and away the easiest to use for the least money. It
also creates problems, the vehicle sticks way farther in back when the
scooter is loaded and is harder to backup, many vehicles will require
air adjustable shocks (lift weighs about 100lbs, scooters can weigh as
much as 225lbs although most are under 200lbs.
Another comment: Where's those potato chips?
news:6b73f$450c32d1$422afc51$31650@FUSE.NET:
> My dad has one of those 'go-karts', and it is difficult for my mom
> and sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
I know, I tried that for some time, finally gave up as my arthritis got
worse and got the lift.
> What lift do you have?
I bought mine used and added the swing away option (it also was second
hand).
http://www.worldwide-mobility.com/
Mine is the same as the current Ultra model but does not have the
automatic tilt feature, that's not a problem because there's more than
enough clearance.
> Wish you'd gotten something else?
No, I'm pretty happy with it and I've compared it to others that I
don't like as well because of cheaper construction, less convenience,
etc. Note, these are personal opinions.
> Thoughts/comments?
Thought: I'd like some potato chips to go with watching football on TV,
you got any?
Comment: There's lots of ways to carry a scooter, the outside lift such
as mine is far and away the easiest to use for the least money. It
also creates problems, the vehicle sticks way farther in back when the
scooter is loaded and is harder to backup, many vehicles will require
air adjustable shocks (lift weighs about 100lbs, scooters can weigh as
much as 225lbs although most are under 200lbs.
Another comment: Where's those potato chips?
09-16-2006, 01:54 PM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lift, was: 1998 Grand 8 cyl 5.9
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in
news:6b73f$450c32d1$422afc51$31650@FUSE.NET:
> My dad has one of those 'go-karts', and it is difficult for my mom
> and sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
I know, I tried that for some time, finally gave up as my arthritis got
worse and got the lift.
> What lift do you have?
I bought mine used and added the swing away option (it also was second
hand).
http://www.worldwide-mobility.com/
Mine is the same as the current Ultra model but does not have the
automatic tilt feature, that's not a problem because there's more than
enough clearance.
> Wish you'd gotten something else?
No, I'm pretty happy with it and I've compared it to others that I
don't like as well because of cheaper construction, less convenience,
etc. Note, these are personal opinions.
> Thoughts/comments?
Thought: I'd like some potato chips to go with watching football on TV,
you got any?
Comment: There's lots of ways to carry a scooter, the outside lift such
as mine is far and away the easiest to use for the least money. It
also creates problems, the vehicle sticks way farther in back when the
scooter is loaded and is harder to backup, many vehicles will require
air adjustable shocks (lift weighs about 100lbs, scooters can weigh as
much as 225lbs although most are under 200lbs.
Another comment: Where's those potato chips?
news:6b73f$450c32d1$422afc51$31650@FUSE.NET:
> My dad has one of those 'go-karts', and it is difficult for my mom
> and sister to disassemble it when they go on a trip.
I know, I tried that for some time, finally gave up as my arthritis got
worse and got the lift.
> What lift do you have?
I bought mine used and added the swing away option (it also was second
hand).
http://www.worldwide-mobility.com/
Mine is the same as the current Ultra model but does not have the
automatic tilt feature, that's not a problem because there's more than
enough clearance.
> Wish you'd gotten something else?
No, I'm pretty happy with it and I've compared it to others that I
don't like as well because of cheaper construction, less convenience,
etc. Note, these are personal opinions.
> Thoughts/comments?
Thought: I'd like some potato chips to go with watching football on TV,
you got any?
Comment: There's lots of ways to carry a scooter, the outside lift such
as mine is far and away the easiest to use for the least money. It
also creates problems, the vehicle sticks way farther in back when the
scooter is loaded and is harder to backup, many vehicles will require
air adjustable shocks (lift weighs about 100lbs, scooters can weigh as
much as 225lbs although most are under 200lbs.
Another comment: Where's those potato chips?
