134a Refrigerant
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11ee9mi87gagpac@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:0fEFe.1546$oY.339@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net. ..
> > Here's what I have to say:
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i have nothing to say".
>
> liar.
Welch.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11ee9v7gllik96b@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:nlEFe.1548$oY.626@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net. ..
> >> thats because youre an ignorant fool.
>
> >That's why you crapped yourself?
>
> no, its why you see yourself as a victor here. youve done nothing but
> disgrace yourself and all your liberal buddys by failing to acknowledge your
> mistakes. YOU overlooked the CLEARLY posted -30 degree condition and when
> call on it you didnt own up to it. instead you attempted to spin and LIE
> your way out of it. you have no integrity at all.
Welch. You are a welch.
> >Another one from the nether regions... deserving
> >of the source... (sound of commode flushing...).
>
> do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
> freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
> force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
> next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Does that mean it has the least thing to do
with your pronunciamento about the atmosphere?
> >And so what? It will eventually make its way
> >to the stratosphere... might take some time.
>
> BZZT! wrong. :-) YOU said that cfc's have been found at the bottom of the
> ocean. why? because their atomic weight is heavier than that of water so
> they settle at the bottom!
More stuff from your butt. You are not to
be trusted... not the sporting sort at all.
Welch.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11ee9v7gllik96b@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:nlEFe.1548$oY.626@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net. ..
> >> thats because youre an ignorant fool.
>
> >That's why you crapped yourself?
>
> no, its why you see yourself as a victor here. youve done nothing but
> disgrace yourself and all your liberal buddys by failing to acknowledge your
> mistakes. YOU overlooked the CLEARLY posted -30 degree condition and when
> call on it you didnt own up to it. instead you attempted to spin and LIE
> your way out of it. you have no integrity at all.
Welch. You are a welch.
> >Another one from the nether regions... deserving
> >of the source... (sound of commode flushing...).
>
> do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
> freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
> force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
> next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Does that mean it has the least thing to do
with your pronunciamento about the atmosphere?
> >And so what? It will eventually make its way
> >to the stratosphere... might take some time.
>
> BZZT! wrong. :-) YOU said that cfc's have been found at the bottom of the
> ocean. why? because their atomic weight is heavier than that of water so
> they settle at the bottom!
More stuff from your butt. You are not to
be trusted... not the sporting sort at all.
Welch.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11ee9v7gllik96b@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:nlEFe.1548$oY.626@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net. ..
> >> thats because youre an ignorant fool.
>
> >That's why you crapped yourself?
>
> no, its why you see yourself as a victor here. youve done nothing but
> disgrace yourself and all your liberal buddys by failing to acknowledge your
> mistakes. YOU overlooked the CLEARLY posted -30 degree condition and when
> call on it you didnt own up to it. instead you attempted to spin and LIE
> your way out of it. you have no integrity at all.
Welch. You are a welch.
> >Another one from the nether regions... deserving
> >of the source... (sound of commode flushing...).
>
> do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
> freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
> force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
> next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Does that mean it has the least thing to do
with your pronunciamento about the atmosphere?
> >And so what? It will eventually make its way
> >to the stratosphere... might take some time.
>
> BZZT! wrong. :-) YOU said that cfc's have been found at the bottom of the
> ocean. why? because their atomic weight is heavier than that of water so
> they settle at the bottom!
More stuff from your butt. You are not to
be trusted... not the sporting sort at all.
Welch.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11ee9v7gllik96b@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:nlEFe.1548$oY.626@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net. ..
> >> thats because youre an ignorant fool.
>
> >That's why you crapped yourself?
>
> no, its why you see yourself as a victor here. youve done nothing but
> disgrace yourself and all your liberal buddys by failing to acknowledge your
> mistakes. YOU overlooked the CLEARLY posted -30 degree condition and when
> call on it you didnt own up to it. instead you attempted to spin and LIE
> your way out of it. you have no integrity at all.
Welch. You are a welch.
> >Another one from the nether regions... deserving
> >of the source... (sound of commode flushing...).
>
> do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
> freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
> force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
> next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Does that mean it has the least thing to do
with your pronunciamento about the atmosphere?
> >And so what? It will eventually make its way
> >to the stratosphere... might take some time.
>
> BZZT! wrong. :-) YOU said that cfc's have been found at the bottom of the
> ocean. why? because their atomic weight is heavier than that of water so
> they settle at the bottom!
More stuff from your butt. You are not to
be trusted... not the sporting sort at all.
Welch.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
In message <11ee9v7gllik96b@corp.supernews.com>, "Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
>freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
>force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
>next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Please clarify. Does this mean the Navy only dumps Dupont refrigerant, or are
you also ignorant to the industry?
>do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
>freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
>force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
>next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Please clarify. Does this mean the Navy only dumps Dupont refrigerant, or are
you also ignorant to the industry?
Guest
Posts: n/a
In message <11ee9v7gllik96b@corp.supernews.com>, "Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
>freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
>force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
>next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Please clarify. Does this mean the Navy only dumps Dupont refrigerant, or are
you also ignorant to the industry?
>do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
>freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
>force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
>next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Please clarify. Does this mean the Navy only dumps Dupont refrigerant, or are
you also ignorant to the industry?
Guest
Posts: n/a
In message <11ee9v7gllik96b@corp.supernews.com>, "Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
>freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
>force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
>next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Please clarify. Does this mean the Navy only dumps Dupont refrigerant, or are
you also ignorant to the industry?
>do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
>freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
>force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
>next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Please clarify. Does this mean the Navy only dumps Dupont refrigerant, or are
you also ignorant to the industry?
Guest
Posts: n/a
In message <11ee9v7gllik96b@corp.supernews.com>, "Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
>freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
>force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
>next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Please clarify. Does this mean the Navy only dumps Dupont refrigerant, or are
you also ignorant to the industry?
>do you really think the navy would post links announcing that they dump
>freon into the ocean? are you really that ------- stupid? does the air
>force post links about dumping unused jet fuel mid-flight to ensure their
>next years allotment? does that mean that it doesnt happen?
Please clarify. Does this mean the Navy only dumps Dupont refrigerant, or are
you also ignorant to the industry?
Guest
Posts: n/a
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E716AA.29FE0804@***.net...
> There you go lying again, I never said or wrote: "volume = delta
> density". I've told you they are variables over and over and over again!
Bill... if you had half a brain, you wouldn't be the fool
you are. That's why I don't bother calling you a liar...
you don't know no better.
> Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
Hard to argue with that example, though... isn't it?
I mean, the way I read it... it says "volume = delta density",
if you read it scientifically. If you hadn't demonstrated
your lack of cranial capacity, I'd call you a damn liar
to your face right now.
__
Steve
..


