134a Refrigerant
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:D9GCe.142$LF.108@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.. .
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11dfim8sma1bea3@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
> >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> >popular use.
>
> .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it
> fits
> your argument. liar.
> Show the lie... or FOAD.
TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
you are a liar stephen.
> You don't have a clue about your limitations
TRANSLATION --> "im to insecure to admit to mine"
lol...i know stephen. youre such big liar youve even convinced yourself.
:-)
> because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.
No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop
LIAR! once again your lies will not cut it! i CLEARLY stated the ambient
was -14 otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the HMC.
> You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
> in another condition! I must be right!
what a filthy little LIAR you are! trying to "weasel in a condition"? see
news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com where i CLEARLY said a -30 degree
day.
liar.
> >ohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.
TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
.....im sure it does, liar.
> mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
> defines it as:
>
> "A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
> fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
> refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."
>
> it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything
> else.
> im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.
>
> liar.
> Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!
TRANSLATION --> "youre right, i have no response"
suck it up buttercup. :-) freon is a brand name. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:D9GCe.142$LF.108@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.. .
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11dfim8sma1bea3@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
> >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> >popular use.
>
> .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it
> fits
> your argument. liar.
> Show the lie... or FOAD.
TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
you are a liar stephen.
> You don't have a clue about your limitations
TRANSLATION --> "im to insecure to admit to mine"
lol...i know stephen. youre such big liar youve even convinced yourself.
:-)
> because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.
No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop
LIAR! once again your lies will not cut it! i CLEARLY stated the ambient
was -14 otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the HMC.
> You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
> in another condition! I must be right!
what a filthy little LIAR you are! trying to "weasel in a condition"? see
news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com where i CLEARLY said a -30 degree
day.
liar.
> >ohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.
TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
.....im sure it does, liar.
> mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
> defines it as:
>
> "A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
> fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
> refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."
>
> it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything
> else.
> im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.
>
> liar.
> Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!
TRANSLATION --> "youre right, i have no response"
suck it up buttercup. :-) freon is a brand name. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sure. I think you should go back to seventh grade science, and
Algebra.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
> Recall the beforeposts:
> Bill:
> Me:
> >Bill's new science... volume = density!
> >That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> >explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> >his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> >they *are* impressive!
>
> I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> How's that for complex?
> __
> Steve
> .
Algebra.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
> Recall the beforeposts:
> Bill:
> Me:
> >Bill's new science... volume = density!
> >That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> >explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> >his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> >they *are* impressive!
>
> I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> How's that for complex?
> __
> Steve
> .
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sure. I think you should go back to seventh grade science, and
Algebra.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
> Recall the beforeposts:
> Bill:
> Me:
> >Bill's new science... volume = density!
> >That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> >explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> >his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> >they *are* impressive!
>
> I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> How's that for complex?
> __
> Steve
> .
Algebra.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
> Recall the beforeposts:
> Bill:
> Me:
> >Bill's new science... volume = density!
> >That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> >explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> >his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> >they *are* impressive!
>
> I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> How's that for complex?
> __
> Steve
> .
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sure. I think you should go back to seventh grade science, and
Algebra.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
> Recall the beforeposts:
> Bill:
> Me:
> >Bill's new science... volume = density!
> >That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> >explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> >his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> >they *are* impressive!
>
> I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> How's that for complex?
> __
> Steve
> .
Algebra.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
> Recall the beforeposts:
> Bill:
> Me:
> >Bill's new science... volume = density!
> >That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> >explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> >his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> >they *are* impressive!
>
> I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> How's that for complex?
> __
> Steve
> .
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sure. I think you should go back to seventh grade science, and
Algebra.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
> Recall the beforeposts:
> Bill:
> Me:
> >Bill's new science... volume = density!
> >That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> >explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> >his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> >they *are* impressive!
>
> I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> How's that for complex?
> __
> Steve
> .
Algebra.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
> Recall the beforeposts:
> Bill:
> Me:
> >Bill's new science... volume = density!
> >That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> >explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> >his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> >they *are* impressive!
>
> I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> How's that for complex?
> __
> Steve
> .
Guest
Posts: n/a
An excellent example of "praeteritio", for the grammarians amongs us :-)
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
Guest
Posts: n/a
An excellent example of "praeteritio", for the grammarians amongs us :-)
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
Guest
Posts: n/a
An excellent example of "praeteritio", for the grammarians amongs us :-)
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
Guest
Posts: n/a
An excellent example of "praeteritio", for the grammarians amongs us :-)
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Do grammarians go to Mass also?
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:0JKCe.72108$G8.35670@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> An excellent example of "praeteritio", for the grammarians amongs us :-)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
>
> "Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
>> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
>> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
>
>
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:0JKCe.72108$G8.35670@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> An excellent example of "praeteritio", for the grammarians amongs us :-)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
>
> "Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:41c3b$42db3992$4831337f$19805@FUSE.NET...
>> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
>> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.
>
>


