134a Refrigerant
#2491
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
(sigh)
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42CC67EA.59D6C2E9@***.net...
> Sorry Matt, I didn't see the fake name's dates. Looks like it be gone
> the September anyway. And look again:
> http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/ Mickeysoft's not fake,
> along with yours with their own Real servers IPs. You mean you really
> can't tell the difference? Maybe if print out your Domain registry and
> compare it with your fake liberal student body run site at
> fakecheck.org.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> What part of
>>
>> >> Created On:29-Sep-2003 18:02:43 UTC
>> >> Last Updated On:19-Jan-2005 21:20:06 UTC
>> >> Expiration Date:29-Sep-2005 18:02:43 UTC
>>
>> do you not understand?
>>
>> So is starwars.com a fake domain? Microsoft.com? How about sears.com?
>> dell.com? chrysler.com? google.com? how about townpeddler.com? None of
>> these
>> domains are registered through Network Solutions, I guess they are all
>> fake,
>> since you say if it isn't registered through netsol, it must be fake.
>> Which
>> of course is a red herring in the discussion about factcheck.org.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42CC67EA.59D6C2E9@***.net...
> Sorry Matt, I didn't see the fake name's dates. Looks like it be gone
> the September anyway. And look again:
> http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/ Mickeysoft's not fake,
> along with yours with their own Real servers IPs. You mean you really
> can't tell the difference? Maybe if print out your Domain registry and
> compare it with your fake liberal student body run site at
> fakecheck.org.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> What part of
>>
>> >> Created On:29-Sep-2003 18:02:43 UTC
>> >> Last Updated On:19-Jan-2005 21:20:06 UTC
>> >> Expiration Date:29-Sep-2005 18:02:43 UTC
>>
>> do you not understand?
>>
>> So is starwars.com a fake domain? Microsoft.com? How about sears.com?
>> dell.com? chrysler.com? google.com? how about townpeddler.com? None of
>> these
>> domains are registered through Network Solutions, I guess they are all
>> fake,
>> since you say if it isn't registered through netsol, it must be fake.
>> Which
>> of course is a red herring in the discussion about factcheck.org.
#2492
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
(sigh)
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42CC67EA.59D6C2E9@***.net...
> Sorry Matt, I didn't see the fake name's dates. Looks like it be gone
> the September anyway. And look again:
> http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/ Mickeysoft's not fake,
> along with yours with their own Real servers IPs. You mean you really
> can't tell the difference? Maybe if print out your Domain registry and
> compare it with your fake liberal student body run site at
> fakecheck.org.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> What part of
>>
>> >> Created On:29-Sep-2003 18:02:43 UTC
>> >> Last Updated On:19-Jan-2005 21:20:06 UTC
>> >> Expiration Date:29-Sep-2005 18:02:43 UTC
>>
>> do you not understand?
>>
>> So is starwars.com a fake domain? Microsoft.com? How about sears.com?
>> dell.com? chrysler.com? google.com? how about townpeddler.com? None of
>> these
>> domains are registered through Network Solutions, I guess they are all
>> fake,
>> since you say if it isn't registered through netsol, it must be fake.
>> Which
>> of course is a red herring in the discussion about factcheck.org.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42CC67EA.59D6C2E9@***.net...
> Sorry Matt, I didn't see the fake name's dates. Looks like it be gone
> the September anyway. And look again:
> http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/ Mickeysoft's not fake,
> along with yours with their own Real servers IPs. You mean you really
> can't tell the difference? Maybe if print out your Domain registry and
> compare it with your fake liberal student body run site at
> fakecheck.org.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> What part of
>>
>> >> Created On:29-Sep-2003 18:02:43 UTC
>> >> Last Updated On:19-Jan-2005 21:20:06 UTC
>> >> Expiration Date:29-Sep-2005 18:02:43 UTC
>>
>> do you not understand?
>>
>> So is starwars.com a fake domain? Microsoft.com? How about sears.com?
>> dell.com? chrysler.com? google.com? how about townpeddler.com? None of
>> these
>> domains are registered through Network Solutions, I guess they are all
>> fake,
>> since you say if it isn't registered through netsol, it must be fake.
>> Which
>> of course is a red herring in the discussion about factcheck.org.
#2493
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
(sigh)
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42CC67EA.59D6C2E9@***.net...
> Sorry Matt, I didn't see the fake name's dates. Looks like it be gone
> the September anyway. And look again:
> http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/ Mickeysoft's not fake,
> along with yours with their own Real servers IPs. You mean you really
> can't tell the difference? Maybe if print out your Domain registry and
> compare it with your fake liberal student body run site at
> fakecheck.org.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> What part of
>>
>> >> Created On:29-Sep-2003 18:02:43 UTC
>> >> Last Updated On:19-Jan-2005 21:20:06 UTC
>> >> Expiration Date:29-Sep-2005 18:02:43 UTC
>>
>> do you not understand?
>>
>> So is starwars.com a fake domain? Microsoft.com? How about sears.com?
>> dell.com? chrysler.com? google.com? how about townpeddler.com? None of
>> these
>> domains are registered through Network Solutions, I guess they are all
>> fake,
>> since you say if it isn't registered through netsol, it must be fake.
>> Which
>> of course is a red herring in the discussion about factcheck.org.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42CC67EA.59D6C2E9@***.net...
> Sorry Matt, I didn't see the fake name's dates. Looks like it be gone
> the September anyway. And look again:
> http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/ Mickeysoft's not fake,
> along with yours with their own Real servers IPs. You mean you really
> can't tell the difference? Maybe if print out your Domain registry and
> compare it with your fake liberal student body run site at
> fakecheck.org.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> What part of
>>
>> >> Created On:29-Sep-2003 18:02:43 UTC
>> >> Last Updated On:19-Jan-2005 21:20:06 UTC
>> >> Expiration Date:29-Sep-2005 18:02:43 UTC
>>
>> do you not understand?
>>
>> So is starwars.com a fake domain? Microsoft.com? How about sears.com?
>> dell.com? chrysler.com? google.com? how about townpeddler.com? None of
>> these
>> domains are registered through Network Solutions, I guess they are all
>> fake,
>> since you say if it isn't registered through netsol, it must be fake.
>> Which
>> of course is a red herring in the discussion about factcheck.org.
#2494
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Seriously OT: Re: 134a Refrigerant
"WMS" <mikecec@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:dagr39$r6i$1@mailhub227.itcs.purdue.edu...
....
> @Steve:
> Just give up and leave us alone, will ya? You can't score in this group.
> Find yourself one of these bleeding heart liberal groups and post your crap
> there. They sure will appreciate it.
NLNC!
> This group is about Jeeps. Not politics. If you don't know ---- about Jeeps,
> get the hell out of here and quit attacking regular posters who spend a lot
> of time answering technical questions.
What makes you think I don't know about Jeeps?
Google me in this forum! Then kiss my ***!
I've answered more tech questions than Nate has
since I've been here.... read it and weep.
> Bill and Nate and all the other master jeepers keep this group alive with
> their valuable knowledge. Now go and play with your little friends in the
> sandbox.
Bill and Nate spew RW hate garbage... you eat
that crap up, don't you? Well, guess what?
Not everybody does! Some of us want the
great outdoors to be there for our descendants...
if you like hard UV so much, get an arc lamp
and sit under it for a while!
> Oh, I forgot... Get some education as well.
I'm always getting education... learned about
the HeadMaster(tm) head pressure control
only yesterday! What did you learn yesterday?
__
Steve
..
#2495
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Seriously OT: Re: 134a Refrigerant
"WMS" <mikecec@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:dagr39$r6i$1@mailhub227.itcs.purdue.edu...
....
> @Steve:
> Just give up and leave us alone, will ya? You can't score in this group.
> Find yourself one of these bleeding heart liberal groups and post your crap
> there. They sure will appreciate it.
NLNC!
> This group is about Jeeps. Not politics. If you don't know ---- about Jeeps,
> get the hell out of here and quit attacking regular posters who spend a lot
> of time answering technical questions.
What makes you think I don't know about Jeeps?
Google me in this forum! Then kiss my ***!
I've answered more tech questions than Nate has
since I've been here.... read it and weep.
> Bill and Nate and all the other master jeepers keep this group alive with
> their valuable knowledge. Now go and play with your little friends in the
> sandbox.
Bill and Nate spew RW hate garbage... you eat
that crap up, don't you? Well, guess what?
Not everybody does! Some of us want the
great outdoors to be there for our descendants...
if you like hard UV so much, get an arc lamp
and sit under it for a while!
> Oh, I forgot... Get some education as well.
I'm always getting education... learned about
the HeadMaster(tm) head pressure control
only yesterday! What did you learn yesterday?
__
Steve
..
#2496
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Seriously OT: Re: 134a Refrigerant
"WMS" <mikecec@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:dagr39$r6i$1@mailhub227.itcs.purdue.edu...
....
> @Steve:
> Just give up and leave us alone, will ya? You can't score in this group.
> Find yourself one of these bleeding heart liberal groups and post your crap
> there. They sure will appreciate it.
NLNC!
> This group is about Jeeps. Not politics. If you don't know ---- about Jeeps,
> get the hell out of here and quit attacking regular posters who spend a lot
> of time answering technical questions.
What makes you think I don't know about Jeeps?
Google me in this forum! Then kiss my ***!
I've answered more tech questions than Nate has
since I've been here.... read it and weep.
> Bill and Nate and all the other master jeepers keep this group alive with
> their valuable knowledge. Now go and play with your little friends in the
> sandbox.
Bill and Nate spew RW hate garbage... you eat
that crap up, don't you? Well, guess what?
Not everybody does! Some of us want the
great outdoors to be there for our descendants...
if you like hard UV so much, get an arc lamp
and sit under it for a while!
> Oh, I forgot... Get some education as well.
I'm always getting education... learned about
the HeadMaster(tm) head pressure control
only yesterday! What did you learn yesterday?
__
Steve
..
#2497
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Seriously OT: Re: 134a Refrigerant
"WMS" <mikecec@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:dagr39$r6i$1@mailhub227.itcs.purdue.edu...
....
> @Steve:
> Just give up and leave us alone, will ya? You can't score in this group.
> Find yourself one of these bleeding heart liberal groups and post your crap
> there. They sure will appreciate it.
NLNC!
> This group is about Jeeps. Not politics. If you don't know ---- about Jeeps,
> get the hell out of here and quit attacking regular posters who spend a lot
> of time answering technical questions.
What makes you think I don't know about Jeeps?
Google me in this forum! Then kiss my ***!
I've answered more tech questions than Nate has
since I've been here.... read it and weep.
> Bill and Nate and all the other master jeepers keep this group alive with
> their valuable knowledge. Now go and play with your little friends in the
> sandbox.
Bill and Nate spew RW hate garbage... you eat
that crap up, don't you? Well, guess what?
Not everybody does! Some of us want the
great outdoors to be there for our descendants...
if you like hard UV so much, get an arc lamp
and sit under it for a while!
> Oh, I forgot... Get some education as well.
I'm always getting education... learned about
the HeadMaster(tm) head pressure control
only yesterday! What did you learn yesterday?
__
Steve
..
#2498
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmojcqc04a3e0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:4bJye.1269$Ae.943@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
> > is a component of
> > the atmosphere properly referred to as an
> > 'object'?
>
> i was referencing the atomic weight of the gas and you know it, now stop
> with the red herrings already and stay on topic.
As I stated, it gets to the heart of the matter... you treat
each component of the gas as an 'object'... they are not
available as 'objects', since they are mixed in suspension.
The atmosphere is continuously roiled by thermal effects...
the scenario you're describing is a closed system near
absolute zero... nothing like the Earth's atmosphere.
You still haven't told me why the whole world is wrong...
your vocabulary is improving, though.
> bottom line, a heavier
> object (or liquid, or gas) will settle below a lighter one at _any_ altitude
> and not just above a magical number as you stated earlier.
Then why does the atmosphere mix? Up to 100km,
amorphous!
__
Steve
..
#2499
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmojcqc04a3e0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:4bJye.1269$Ae.943@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
> > is a component of
> > the atmosphere properly referred to as an
> > 'object'?
>
> i was referencing the atomic weight of the gas and you know it, now stop
> with the red herrings already and stay on topic.
As I stated, it gets to the heart of the matter... you treat
each component of the gas as an 'object'... they are not
available as 'objects', since they are mixed in suspension.
The atmosphere is continuously roiled by thermal effects...
the scenario you're describing is a closed system near
absolute zero... nothing like the Earth's atmosphere.
You still haven't told me why the whole world is wrong...
your vocabulary is improving, though.
> bottom line, a heavier
> object (or liquid, or gas) will settle below a lighter one at _any_ altitude
> and not just above a magical number as you stated earlier.
Then why does the atmosphere mix? Up to 100km,
amorphous!
__
Steve
..
#2500
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmojcqc04a3e0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:4bJye.1269$Ae.943@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
> > is a component of
> > the atmosphere properly referred to as an
> > 'object'?
>
> i was referencing the atomic weight of the gas and you know it, now stop
> with the red herrings already and stay on topic.
As I stated, it gets to the heart of the matter... you treat
each component of the gas as an 'object'... they are not
available as 'objects', since they are mixed in suspension.
The atmosphere is continuously roiled by thermal effects...
the scenario you're describing is a closed system near
absolute zero... nothing like the Earth's atmosphere.
You still haven't told me why the whole world is wrong...
your vocabulary is improving, though.
> bottom line, a heavier
> object (or liquid, or gas) will settle below a lighter one at _any_ altitude
> and not just above a magical number as you stated earlier.
Then why does the atmosphere mix? Up to 100km,
amorphous!
__
Steve
..