Stephen Cowell

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c970t2datol78@corp.supernews.com...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
> >
<>
Heterosphere
Below an altitude of about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere has a more-or-less uniform composition (apart from water vapor) as described above. However, above about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere begins to have a composition which varies with altitude. This is essentially because, in the absence of mixing, the density of a gas falls off exponentially with increasing altitude, but at a rate which depends on the molecular mass. Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more quickly than lighter constituents such as helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. Thus there is a layer, called the heterosphere, in which the earth's atmosphere has varying composition. As the altitude increases, the atmosphere is dominated successively by helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. The precise altitude of the heterosphere and the layers it contains varies significantly with temperature.[2]
</>
>
> thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. :-)

Above 100km altitude... that's pretty high up there.. in fact, it's
above a major portion of the ozone layer, as evidenced by the
second link. This means that part of the ozone layer lies below the
Heterosphere, which means that the atmospheric mixing can
carry CFC up to those heights. I told you you wouldn't
want to understand... we all realize this. It's no longer
important what you say... just keep posting, and I'll
keep making you look like a fool.
__
Steve
..

Stephen Cowell

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c970t2datol78@corp.supernews.com...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
> >
<>
Heterosphere
Below an altitude of about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere has a more-or-less uniform composition (apart from water vapor) as described above. However, above about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere begins to have a composition which varies with altitude. This is essentially because, in the absence of mixing, the density of a gas falls off exponentially with increasing altitude, but at a rate which depends on the molecular mass. Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more quickly than lighter constituents such as helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. Thus there is a layer, called the heterosphere, in which the earth's atmosphere has varying composition. As the altitude increases, the atmosphere is dominated successively by helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. The precise altitude of the heterosphere and the layers it contains varies significantly with temperature.[2]
</>
>
> thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. :-)

Above 100km altitude... that's pretty high up there.. in fact, it's
above a major portion of the ozone layer, as evidenced by the
second link. This means that part of the ozone layer lies below the
Heterosphere, which means that the atmospheric mixing can
carry CFC up to those heights. I told you you wouldn't
want to understand... we all realize this. It's no longer
important what you say... just keep posting, and I'll
keep making you look like a fool.
__
Steve
..

Stephen Cowell

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c970t2datol78@corp.supernews.com...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
> >
<>
Heterosphere
Below an altitude of about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere has a more-or-less uniform composition (apart from water vapor) as described above. However, above about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere begins to have a composition which varies with altitude. This is essentially because, in the absence of mixing, the density of a gas falls off exponentially with increasing altitude, but at a rate which depends on the molecular mass. Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more quickly than lighter constituents such as helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. Thus there is a layer, called the heterosphere, in which the earth's atmosphere has varying composition. As the altitude increases, the atmosphere is dominated successively by helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. The precise altitude of the heterosphere and the layers it contains varies significantly with temperature.[2]
</>
>
> thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. :-)

Above 100km altitude... that's pretty high up there.. in fact, it's
above a major portion of the ozone layer, as evidenced by the
second link. This means that part of the ozone layer lies below the
Heterosphere, which means that the atmospheric mixing can
carry CFC up to those heights. I told you you wouldn't
want to understand... we all realize this. It's no longer
important what you say... just keep posting, and I'll
keep making you look like a fool.
__
Steve
..

Nathan W. Collier

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:7m5xe.1451$U61.961@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...

> Above 100km altitude... that's pretty high up there

lol.....so youre suggesting that heavier only falls when its above 100km?
BUWHAHA!

you made my point for me liberal. thanks. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

Nathan W. Collier

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:7m5xe.1451$U61.961@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...

> Above 100km altitude... that's pretty high up there

lol.....so youre suggesting that heavier only falls when its above 100km?
BUWHAHA!

you made my point for me liberal. thanks. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

Nathan W. Collier

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:7m5xe.1451$U61.961@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...

> Above 100km altitude... that's pretty high up there

lol.....so youre suggesting that heavier only falls when its above 100km?
BUWHAHA!

you made my point for me liberal. thanks. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

Nathan W. Collier

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:7m5xe.1451$U61.961@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...

> Above 100km altitude... that's pretty high up there

lol.....so youre suggesting that heavier only falls when its above 100km?
BUWHAHA!

you made my point for me liberal. thanks. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

Stephen Cowell

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c97bo1qq95peb@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:XzSwe.1211$U61.971@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>>Funny how I'm crumbling with my foot on your
>>neck... yeah, I always crumble that way. What
>>was it Newt said? Oh yeah... "Go negative early,
>>don't give up". He's my mentor!
>
> put the crack pipe down. :-)
>
> ...too ignorant to debate logic and fact,

??

> to foolish to know when to shut
> up,

???

>and to stupid to think that you can actually fool anybody by declaring
> victory which youve done at least a dozen times. lol

Haven't I won? Haven't I posted information debunking
every assertion you've made?
__
Steve
..

Stephen Cowell

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c97bo1qq95peb@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:XzSwe.1211$U61.971@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>>Funny how I'm crumbling with my foot on your
>>neck... yeah, I always crumble that way. What
>>was it Newt said? Oh yeah... "Go negative early,
>>don't give up". He's my mentor!
>
> put the crack pipe down. :-)
>
> ...too ignorant to debate logic and fact,

??

> to foolish to know when to shut
> up,

???

>and to stupid to think that you can actually fool anybody by declaring
> victory which youve done at least a dozen times. lol

Haven't I won? Haven't I posted information debunking
every assertion you've made?
__
Steve
..

Stephen Cowell

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c97bo1qq95peb@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:XzSwe.1211$U61.971@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>>Funny how I'm crumbling with my foot on your
>>neck... yeah, I always crumble that way. What
>>was it Newt said? Oh yeah... "Go negative early,
>>don't give up". He's my mentor!
>
> put the crack pipe down. :-)
>
> ...too ignorant to debate logic and fact,

??

> to foolish to know when to shut
> up,

???

>and to stupid to think that you can actually fool anybody by declaring
> victory which youve done at least a dozen times. lol

Haven't I won? Haven't I posted information debunking
every assertion you've made?
__
Steve
..