"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42AE182E.453EDAEC@***.net...
> I going to have the Republican party send you a thank you note for
> my donation. People like you have got to be stopped from ------ing
> untruths. Your insinuating my use of a rattle can painting a part in the
> fifties somehow crossed hemispheres to contribute to destruction of the
> ozone in the southern hemisphere is preposterous! And traitorous as
> those thoughts lead to off shore production by companies not strangled
> by our SMOG laws.

Ah, the 'bottom line'.... and I completely understand,
ever since spray paint was made illegal it's been hard.
Next they'll outlaw the brush! You'll have to daub it
on with a stick... all in the name of some ----- scientists
and their ----- theories.

BTW, I don't hear the Republican party advocating
repeal of the EPA act.... Nixon did it, after all!

Oh, btw, Freon is in the ocean water, too... and is detectable
in well water. It's now a reliable test for telling the age
of the water you're drinking...

http://water.usgs.gov/lab/cfc/background/Chapter.html

<>
CFCs provide excellent tracers and dating tools of young water (50 year time scale). CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113 concentrations in water can be determined to a detection limit of about 0.3 picograms per kg of water (pg/kg-1) using purge and trap, gas chromatographic techniques with electron-capture detector (GC-ECD; Bullister, 1984; Bullister and Weiss, 1988; Busenberg and Plummer, 1992). This means that by measuring concentrations of CFC-12, CFC-11 and CFC-113, it is possible to identify groundwater recharged since approximately 1941, 1947, and 1955, respectively. Groundwater dating with CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113 is possible because (1) the atmospheric mixing ratios of these compounds are known and/or have been reconstructed over the past 50 years, (2) the Henry's law solubilities in water are known, and (3) concentrations in air and young water are relatively high and can be measured.
</>

You'd be better off stonewalling like Nate...
__
Steve
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42AD28A3.238DBF3F@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Bill... does the air one foot north of the
> > equator mix with the air one foot south
> > of the equator?

> I'm sure you could carry your hot air across. But it's not going to
> be pushed there via the jet stream.

OK... I'll take that as a yes. Now, does the air *two* feet
north of the equator mix with the air *one* foot north
of the equator? And vis a vis the south example, same?
__
Steve
reductio ad absurdum
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42AD28A3.238DBF3F@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Bill... does the air one foot north of the
> > equator mix with the air one foot south
> > of the equator?

> I'm sure you could carry your hot air across. But it's not going to
> be pushed there via the jet stream.

OK... I'll take that as a yes. Now, does the air *two* feet
north of the equator mix with the air *one* foot north
of the equator? And vis a vis the south example, same?
__
Steve
reductio ad absurdum
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42AD28A3.238DBF3F@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Bill... does the air one foot north of the
> > equator mix with the air one foot south
> > of the equator?

> I'm sure you could carry your hot air across. But it's not going to
> be pushed there via the jet stream.

OK... I'll take that as a yes. Now, does the air *two* feet
north of the equator mix with the air *one* foot north
of the equator? And vis a vis the south example, same?
__
Steve
reductio ad absurdum
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42AD28A3.238DBF3F@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Bill... does the air one foot north of the
> > equator mix with the air one foot south
> > of the equator?

> I'm sure you could carry your hot air across. But it's not going to
> be pushed there via the jet stream.

OK... I'll take that as a yes. Now, does the air *two* feet
north of the equator mix with the air *one* foot north
of the equator? And vis a vis the south example, same?
__
Steve
reductio ad absurdum
..

 

> It's now a reliable test for telling the age of the water you're drinking

serious question, arguments aside......isnt our drinking water the _same_
water the dinosaurs drank? recycled many times certainly, but i was unaware
of "new" water. where does it come from?

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

> It's now a reliable test for telling the age of the water you're drinking

serious question, arguments aside......isnt our drinking water the _same_
water the dinosaurs drank? recycled many times certainly, but i was unaware
of "new" water. where does it come from?

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

> It's now a reliable test for telling the age of the water you're drinking

serious question, arguments aside......isnt our drinking water the _same_
water the dinosaurs drank? recycled many times certainly, but i was unaware
of "new" water. where does it come from?

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

> It's now a reliable test for telling the age of the water you're drinking

serious question, arguments aside......isnt our drinking water the _same_
water the dinosaurs drank? recycled many times certainly, but i was unaware
of "new" water. where does it come from?

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

I would hope so..... Chlorine occurs naturally in our oceans:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
><snip BS rhetoric>
>
> Oh, btw, Freon is in the ocean water, too... and is detectable
> in well water. It's now a reliable test for telling the age
> of the water you're drinking...
> __
> Steve
> .