Re: 134a Refrigerant
No thanks, I've heard the rumor of what happens when you haven't
vacuumed the twelve out and go ahead and fill it with 134. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Chuck wrote: > > Shoot a little propane in the system and enjoy - |
Re: 134a Refrigerant
No thanks, I've heard the rumor of what happens when you haven't
vacuumed the twelve out and go ahead and fill it with 134. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Chuck wrote: > > Shoot a little propane in the system and enjoy - |
Re: 134a Refrigerant
No thanks, I've heard the rumor of what happens when you haven't
vacuumed the twelve out and go ahead and fill it with 134. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Chuck wrote: > > Shoot a little propane in the system and enjoy - |
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Chuck wrote:
> Shoot a little propane in the system and enjoy - > It's not perfect but it'll work. IIRC, the oil in a R12 system is correct for propane too.. It's been a while since I looked into it.. Oh, I remember, I think- the vapor pressure is too high, adding 30% isobutane brings it right into line. I've heard that isobutane can be found as high-altitude campstove gas. If you were to do it, which I believe is a federal crime, I think it would be better to use the small bottles for torches/lanterns as I don't think they have the stinky chemical in them.. that will contaminate the oil and shorten the life of the system. Propane is a direct replacement for R22- virtually identical pressure curves and, again, the oil is compatible. Anhydrous ammonia is another candidate. I am unaware of legal complications with anhydrous, as with all things bragging without proper learning is contraindicated. |
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Chuck wrote:
> Shoot a little propane in the system and enjoy - > It's not perfect but it'll work. IIRC, the oil in a R12 system is correct for propane too.. It's been a while since I looked into it.. Oh, I remember, I think- the vapor pressure is too high, adding 30% isobutane brings it right into line. I've heard that isobutane can be found as high-altitude campstove gas. If you were to do it, which I believe is a federal crime, I think it would be better to use the small bottles for torches/lanterns as I don't think they have the stinky chemical in them.. that will contaminate the oil and shorten the life of the system. Propane is a direct replacement for R22- virtually identical pressure curves and, again, the oil is compatible. Anhydrous ammonia is another candidate. I am unaware of legal complications with anhydrous, as with all things bragging without proper learning is contraindicated. |
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Chuck wrote:
> Shoot a little propane in the system and enjoy - > It's not perfect but it'll work. IIRC, the oil in a R12 system is correct for propane too.. It's been a while since I looked into it.. Oh, I remember, I think- the vapor pressure is too high, adding 30% isobutane brings it right into line. I've heard that isobutane can be found as high-altitude campstove gas. If you were to do it, which I believe is a federal crime, I think it would be better to use the small bottles for torches/lanterns as I don't think they have the stinky chemical in them.. that will contaminate the oil and shorten the life of the system. Propane is a direct replacement for R22- virtually identical pressure curves and, again, the oil is compatible. Anhydrous ammonia is another candidate. I am unaware of legal complications with anhydrous, as with all things bragging without proper learning is contraindicated. |
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Chuck wrote:
> Shoot a little propane in the system and enjoy - > It's not perfect but it'll work. IIRC, the oil in a R12 system is correct for propane too.. It's been a while since I looked into it.. Oh, I remember, I think- the vapor pressure is too high, adding 30% isobutane brings it right into line. I've heard that isobutane can be found as high-altitude campstove gas. If you were to do it, which I believe is a federal crime, I think it would be better to use the small bottles for torches/lanterns as I don't think they have the stinky chemical in them.. that will contaminate the oil and shorten the life of the system. Propane is a direct replacement for R22- virtually identical pressure curves and, again, the oil is compatible. Anhydrous ammonia is another candidate. I am unaware of legal complications with anhydrous, as with all things bragging without proper learning is contraindicated. |
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> I hadn't heard that there was any problem with making R134, and I am > surprised that anybody is reporting trouble finding it. > > And, I agree, going back to R12 isn't gonna happen. It's very expensive, > and there are seriouis compatibility issues that add to the cost. I > think one is going to spend the summer with the windows rolled down > before one goes back to R12. R12 is cheaper to produce than 134. It's pretty non-toxic too, which can't be said for 134. Political creatures have made 12 expensive. John |
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> I hadn't heard that there was any problem with making R134, and I am > surprised that anybody is reporting trouble finding it. > > And, I agree, going back to R12 isn't gonna happen. It's very expensive, > and there are seriouis compatibility issues that add to the cost. I > think one is going to spend the summer with the windows rolled down > before one goes back to R12. R12 is cheaper to produce than 134. It's pretty non-toxic too, which can't be said for 134. Political creatures have made 12 expensive. John |
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> I hadn't heard that there was any problem with making R134, and I am > surprised that anybody is reporting trouble finding it. > > And, I agree, going back to R12 isn't gonna happen. It's very expensive, > and there are seriouis compatibility issues that add to the cost. I > think one is going to spend the summer with the windows rolled down > before one goes back to R12. R12 is cheaper to produce than 134. It's pretty non-toxic too, which can't be said for 134. Political creatures have made 12 expensive. John |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands