{OT} -- Computer Problem
#191
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
Really!?
I do not use Google as my Home Page, but it occurs to me that my b-in-law
might have. I prefer Yahoo as my Home page, and I keep Google as a Favorite.
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45b057cc$0$8914$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> If the machine has Google Desktop on it you might try removing it. It's
> nice to have but sometimes it goes nuts and slows the system to a crawl.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
I do not use Google as my Home Page, but it occurs to me that my b-in-law
might have. I prefer Yahoo as my Home page, and I keep Google as a Favorite.
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45b057cc$0$8914$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> If the machine has Google Desktop on it you might try removing it. It's
> nice to have but sometimes it goes nuts and slows the system to a crawl.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
#192
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
Really!?
I do not use Google as my Home Page, but it occurs to me that my b-in-law
might have. I prefer Yahoo as my Home page, and I keep Google as a Favorite.
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45b057cc$0$8914$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> If the machine has Google Desktop on it you might try removing it. It's
> nice to have but sometimes it goes nuts and slows the system to a crawl.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
I do not use Google as my Home Page, but it occurs to me that my b-in-law
might have. I prefer Yahoo as my Home page, and I keep Google as a Favorite.
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45b057cc$0$8914$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> If the machine has Google Desktop on it you might try removing it. It's
> nice to have but sometimes it goes nuts and slows the system to a crawl.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
#193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
Really!?
I do not use Google as my Home Page, but it occurs to me that my b-in-law
might have. I prefer Yahoo as my Home page, and I keep Google as a Favorite.
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45b057cc$0$8914$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> If the machine has Google Desktop on it you might try removing it. It's
> nice to have but sometimes it goes nuts and slows the system to a crawl.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
I do not use Google as my Home Page, but it occurs to me that my b-in-law
might have. I prefer Yahoo as my Home page, and I keep Google as a Favorite.
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45b057cc$0$8914$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> If the machine has Google Desktop on it you might try removing it. It's
> nice to have but sometimes it goes nuts and slows the system to a crawl.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
#194
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
If your system is running poorly you have a real problem participating in
the newsgroup.
While this is not strictly on topic and occasional foray into computer
problems does not bother or offend me.
"Curtis Geiger" <cngeiger@filertel.com> wrote in message
news:12r06dre5geh399@corp.supernews.com...
> And what the hell does this all have to do with jeeps?
> "ufatbastehd" <ufatbasted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1169166973.286378.175460@m58g2000cwm.googlegr oups.com...
>> Yes more ram is better. I wouldn't run less than 1 gig.
>>
>> But Microsoft says
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314865
>>
>>
>> James wrote:
>>> With Windows XP, you are a bit underpowered on ram. Many folks
>>> believe
>>> that 512 mb is minimum, and more is better.
>>>
>>> Good luck !!
>>>
>>> --james--
>>
>
>
the newsgroup.
While this is not strictly on topic and occasional foray into computer
problems does not bother or offend me.
"Curtis Geiger" <cngeiger@filertel.com> wrote in message
news:12r06dre5geh399@corp.supernews.com...
> And what the hell does this all have to do with jeeps?
> "ufatbastehd" <ufatbasted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1169166973.286378.175460@m58g2000cwm.googlegr oups.com...
>> Yes more ram is better. I wouldn't run less than 1 gig.
>>
>> But Microsoft says
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314865
>>
>>
>> James wrote:
>>> With Windows XP, you are a bit underpowered on ram. Many folks
>>> believe
>>> that 512 mb is minimum, and more is better.
>>>
>>> Good luck !!
>>>
>>> --james--
>>
>
>
#195
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
If your system is running poorly you have a real problem participating in
the newsgroup.
While this is not strictly on topic and occasional foray into computer
problems does not bother or offend me.
"Curtis Geiger" <cngeiger@filertel.com> wrote in message
news:12r06dre5geh399@corp.supernews.com...
> And what the hell does this all have to do with jeeps?
> "ufatbastehd" <ufatbasted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1169166973.286378.175460@m58g2000cwm.googlegr oups.com...
>> Yes more ram is better. I wouldn't run less than 1 gig.
>>
>> But Microsoft says
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314865
>>
>>
>> James wrote:
>>> With Windows XP, you are a bit underpowered on ram. Many folks
>>> believe
>>> that 512 mb is minimum, and more is better.
>>>
>>> Good luck !!
>>>
>>> --james--
>>
>
>
the newsgroup.
While this is not strictly on topic and occasional foray into computer
problems does not bother or offend me.
"Curtis Geiger" <cngeiger@filertel.com> wrote in message
news:12r06dre5geh399@corp.supernews.com...
> And what the hell does this all have to do with jeeps?
> "ufatbastehd" <ufatbasted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1169166973.286378.175460@m58g2000cwm.googlegr oups.com...
>> Yes more ram is better. I wouldn't run less than 1 gig.
>>
>> But Microsoft says
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314865
>>
>>
>> James wrote:
>>> With Windows XP, you are a bit underpowered on ram. Many folks
>>> believe
>>> that 512 mb is minimum, and more is better.
>>>
>>> Good luck !!
>>>
>>> --james--
>>
>
>
#196
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
If your system is running poorly you have a real problem participating in
the newsgroup.
While this is not strictly on topic and occasional foray into computer
problems does not bother or offend me.
"Curtis Geiger" <cngeiger@filertel.com> wrote in message
news:12r06dre5geh399@corp.supernews.com...
> And what the hell does this all have to do with jeeps?
> "ufatbastehd" <ufatbasted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1169166973.286378.175460@m58g2000cwm.googlegr oups.com...
>> Yes more ram is better. I wouldn't run less than 1 gig.
>>
>> But Microsoft says
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314865
>>
>>
>> James wrote:
>>> With Windows XP, you are a bit underpowered on ram. Many folks
>>> believe
>>> that 512 mb is minimum, and more is better.
>>>
>>> Good luck !!
>>>
>>> --james--
>>
>
>
the newsgroup.
While this is not strictly on topic and occasional foray into computer
problems does not bother or offend me.
"Curtis Geiger" <cngeiger@filertel.com> wrote in message
news:12r06dre5geh399@corp.supernews.com...
> And what the hell does this all have to do with jeeps?
> "ufatbastehd" <ufatbasted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1169166973.286378.175460@m58g2000cwm.googlegr oups.com...
>> Yes more ram is better. I wouldn't run less than 1 gig.
>>
>> But Microsoft says
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314865
>>
>>
>> James wrote:
>>> With Windows XP, you are a bit underpowered on ram. Many folks
>>> believe
>>> that 512 mb is minimum, and more is better.
>>>
>>> Good luck !!
>>>
>>> --james--
>>
>
>
#197
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
If your system is running poorly you have a real problem participating in
the newsgroup.
While this is not strictly on topic and occasional foray into computer
problems does not bother or offend me.
"Curtis Geiger" <cngeiger@filertel.com> wrote in message
news:12r06dre5geh399@corp.supernews.com...
> And what the hell does this all have to do with jeeps?
> "ufatbastehd" <ufatbasted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1169166973.286378.175460@m58g2000cwm.googlegr oups.com...
>> Yes more ram is better. I wouldn't run less than 1 gig.
>>
>> But Microsoft says
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314865
>>
>>
>> James wrote:
>>> With Windows XP, you are a bit underpowered on ram. Many folks
>>> believe
>>> that 512 mb is minimum, and more is better.
>>>
>>> Good luck !!
>>>
>>> --james--
>>
>
>
the newsgroup.
While this is not strictly on topic and occasional foray into computer
problems does not bother or offend me.
"Curtis Geiger" <cngeiger@filertel.com> wrote in message
news:12r06dre5geh399@corp.supernews.com...
> And what the hell does this all have to do with jeeps?
> "ufatbastehd" <ufatbasted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1169166973.286378.175460@m58g2000cwm.googlegr oups.com...
>> Yes more ram is better. I wouldn't run less than 1 gig.
>>
>> But Microsoft says
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314865
>>
>>
>> James wrote:
>>> With Windows XP, you are a bit underpowered on ram. Many folks
>>> believe
>>> that 512 mb is minimum, and more is better.
>>>
>>> Good luck !!
>>>
>>> --james--
>>
>
>
#198
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:19:19 GMT, "Jeff Strickland"
<crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>Nothing, that's why the Subject line says {OT}, which signifies Off Topic.
>
>I asked the question here because I happen to know that many of the gear
>heads here are also computer geeks.
>
>
Not sure if it's been asked already, but, has this computer *always*
run slowly, or was it a recent *change* in it's normal behavior??
....
<crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>Nothing, that's why the Subject line says {OT}, which signifies Off Topic.
>
>I asked the question here because I happen to know that many of the gear
>heads here are also computer geeks.
>
>
Not sure if it's been asked already, but, has this computer *always*
run slowly, or was it a recent *change* in it's normal behavior??
....
#199
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:19:19 GMT, "Jeff Strickland"
<crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>Nothing, that's why the Subject line says {OT}, which signifies Off Topic.
>
>I asked the question here because I happen to know that many of the gear
>heads here are also computer geeks.
>
>
Not sure if it's been asked already, but, has this computer *always*
run slowly, or was it a recent *change* in it's normal behavior??
....
<crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>Nothing, that's why the Subject line says {OT}, which signifies Off Topic.
>
>I asked the question here because I happen to know that many of the gear
>heads here are also computer geeks.
>
>
Not sure if it's been asked already, but, has this computer *always*
run slowly, or was it a recent *change* in it's normal behavior??
....
#200
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: {OT} -- Computer Problem
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:19:19 GMT, "Jeff Strickland"
<crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>Nothing, that's why the Subject line says {OT}, which signifies Off Topic.
>
>I asked the question here because I happen to know that many of the gear
>heads here are also computer geeks.
>
>
Not sure if it's been asked already, but, has this computer *always*
run slowly, or was it a recent *change* in it's normal behavior??
....
<crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>Nothing, that's why the Subject line says {OT}, which signifies Off Topic.
>
>I asked the question here because I happen to know that many of the gear
>heads here are also computer geeks.
>
>
Not sure if it's been asked already, but, has this computer *always*
run slowly, or was it a recent *change* in it's normal behavior??
....