[OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
04-09-2004, 07:51 PM
#241
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Dennis" <Howdy Doody@howdydoody.net> wrote in
107e5injp4cgtdd@corp.supernews.com on 4/9/04 2:32 PM:
> In article <BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net>, snit@nospam-cableone.net
> says...
>>
>>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>
>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>
>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>
>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>
>> Just not to the person they want to. Are you advocating making a sham of
>> the whole concept of marriage? I hold marriage, at least in a modern
>> society, to a higher standard.
>>
>
> If the institution of marriage is so sacred as certain people would like us to
> believe, then why do half of the marriages end in divorce? The whole concept
> of marriage is somewhat of a fiction, because of the divorce rate(at least in
> the US). Let's get real.I would bet that those who oppose marriage of gays, do
> so not to preserve the so called "concept of marriage", but really oppose
> homosexulality. Homosexuality has always been with us, and always will be.
> The homophobes need to deal with thier own inner fears.
I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
107e5injp4cgtdd@corp.supernews.com on 4/9/04 2:32 PM:
> In article <BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net>, snit@nospam-cableone.net
> says...
>>
>>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>
>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>
>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>
>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>
>> Just not to the person they want to. Are you advocating making a sham of
>> the whole concept of marriage? I hold marriage, at least in a modern
>> society, to a higher standard.
>>
>
> If the institution of marriage is so sacred as certain people would like us to
> believe, then why do half of the marriages end in divorce? The whole concept
> of marriage is somewhat of a fiction, because of the divorce rate(at least in
> the US). Let's get real.I would bet that those who oppose marriage of gays, do
> so not to preserve the so called "concept of marriage", but really oppose
> homosexulality. Homosexuality has always been with us, and always will be.
> The homophobes need to deal with thier own inner fears.
I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
04-09-2004, 08:00 PM
#242
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Shaggie wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage
>> is bad that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry.
>> There have been a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have
>> other reasons, but they give themselves away by claiming gays are
>> parasites or other such nonsense.
>
> You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
>
Is that a Back-door entry?
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage
>> is bad that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry.
>> There have been a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have
>> other reasons, but they give themselves away by claiming gays are
>> parasites or other such nonsense.
>
> You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
>
Is that a Back-door entry?
04-09-2004, 08:00 PM
#243
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Shaggie wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage
>> is bad that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry.
>> There have been a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have
>> other reasons, but they give themselves away by claiming gays are
>> parasites or other such nonsense.
>
> You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
>
Is that a Back-door entry?
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage
>> is bad that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry.
>> There have been a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have
>> other reasons, but they give themselves away by claiming gays are
>> parasites or other such nonsense.
>
> You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
>
Is that a Back-door entry?
04-09-2004, 08:00 PM
#244
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Shaggie wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage
>> is bad that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry.
>> There have been a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have
>> other reasons, but they give themselves away by claiming gays are
>> parasites or other such nonsense.
>
> You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
>
Is that a Back-door entry?
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage
>> is bad that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry.
>> There have been a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have
>> other reasons, but they give themselves away by claiming gays are
>> parasites or other such nonsense.
>
> You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
>
Is that a Back-door entry?
04-09-2004, 08:00 PM
#245
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Shaggie wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage
>> is bad that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry.
>> There have been a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have
>> other reasons, but they give themselves away by claiming gays are
>> parasites or other such nonsense.
>
> You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
>
Is that a Back-door entry?
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage
>> is bad that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry.
>> There have been a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have
>> other reasons, but they give themselves away by claiming gays are
>> parasites or other such nonsense.
>
> You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
>
Is that a Back-door entry?
04-09-2004, 08:04 PM
#246
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
wrote:
>I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
>that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
>a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
>give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
"I can hammer it back into shape later."
:wq!
wrote:
>I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
>that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
>a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
>give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
"I can hammer it back into shape later."
:wq!
04-09-2004, 08:04 PM
#247
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
wrote:
>I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
>that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
>a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
>give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
"I can hammer it back into shape later."
:wq!
wrote:
>I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
>that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
>a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
>give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
"I can hammer it back into shape later."
:wq!
04-09-2004, 08:04 PM
#248
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
wrote:
>I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
>that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
>a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
>give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
"I can hammer it back into shape later."
:wq!
wrote:
>I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
>that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
>a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
>give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
"I can hammer it back into shape later."
:wq!
04-09-2004, 08:04 PM
#249
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:51:44 -0700, Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net>
wrote:
>I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
>that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
>a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
>give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
"I can hammer it back into shape later."
:wq!
wrote:
>I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
>that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
>a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
>give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
You gay people and homophobes bore me. *plonk*
"I can hammer it back into shape later."
:wq!
04-09-2004, 08:39 PM
#250
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Lo, many moons past, on Fri, 9 Apr 2004 16:12:59 +0000 (UTC), a
stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told
this tale in alt.atheism
>da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google. com:
>
>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>
>Homosexuals can already get married.
And in 1966, in Virginai, blacks could get married to anyone they
wanted.. as long as they were black.
The Supreme Court struck that down. Not because of race, but because
of the violation of the 14th Amendment.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told
this tale in alt.atheism
>da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google. com:
>
>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>
>Homosexuals can already get married.
And in 1966, in Virginai, blacks could get married to anyone they
wanted.. as long as they were black.
The Supreme Court struck that down. Not because of race, but because
of the violation of the 14th Amendment.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
