[OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
#231
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C6A09B12602xomicron@0.0.0.1 on
4/9/04 12:47 PM:
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> news:BC9C4044.4800B%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
>> 4/9/04 11:56 AM:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in
>>>>>> Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into
>>>>>>>> binding, lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue
>>>>>>>> to have our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your
>>>>>>>> promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for wanting to commit to
>>>>>>>> monogamy."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did
>>>> so), what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has
>>>> a loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary
>>>> instead of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your
>>>> marriage, assuming you are married?
>>>
>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you
>>> liberals have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>
>> Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an
>> important reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage.
>
> The "modern" view of marriage doesn't benefit anyone.
My wife and I both benefit from it, both socially and legally. Your
assertion is simply not correct.
> I don't understand how people in my grandparents' generation can get married
> hardly knowing each other but stay together a lifetime, yet now people get
> married after getting to know each other very well and then they end up
> getting divorced.
It is called freedom. There are downsides to it, you know...
4/9/04 12:47 PM:
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> news:BC9C4044.4800B%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
>> 4/9/04 11:56 AM:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in
>>>>>> Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into
>>>>>>>> binding, lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue
>>>>>>>> to have our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your
>>>>>>>> promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for wanting to commit to
>>>>>>>> monogamy."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did
>>>> so), what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has
>>>> a loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary
>>>> instead of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your
>>>> marriage, assuming you are married?
>>>
>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you
>>> liberals have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>
>> Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an
>> important reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage.
>
> The "modern" view of marriage doesn't benefit anyone.
My wife and I both benefit from it, both socially and legally. Your
assertion is simply not correct.
> I don't understand how people in my grandparents' generation can get married
> hardly knowing each other but stay together a lifetime, yet now people get
> married after getting to know each other very well and then they end up
> getting divorced.
It is called freedom. There are downsides to it, you know...
#232
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C6A09B12602xomicron@0.0.0.1 on
4/9/04 12:47 PM:
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> news:BC9C4044.4800B%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
>> 4/9/04 11:56 AM:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in
>>>>>> Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into
>>>>>>>> binding, lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue
>>>>>>>> to have our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your
>>>>>>>> promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for wanting to commit to
>>>>>>>> monogamy."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did
>>>> so), what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has
>>>> a loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary
>>>> instead of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your
>>>> marriage, assuming you are married?
>>>
>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you
>>> liberals have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>
>> Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an
>> important reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage.
>
> The "modern" view of marriage doesn't benefit anyone.
My wife and I both benefit from it, both socially and legally. Your
assertion is simply not correct.
> I don't understand how people in my grandparents' generation can get married
> hardly knowing each other but stay together a lifetime, yet now people get
> married after getting to know each other very well and then they end up
> getting divorced.
It is called freedom. There are downsides to it, you know...
4/9/04 12:47 PM:
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> news:BC9C4044.4800B%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
>> 4/9/04 11:56 AM:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in
>>>>>> Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into
>>>>>>>> binding, lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue
>>>>>>>> to have our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your
>>>>>>>> promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for wanting to commit to
>>>>>>>> monogamy."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did
>>>> so), what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has
>>>> a loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary
>>>> instead of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your
>>>> marriage, assuming you are married?
>>>
>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you
>>> liberals have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>
>> Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an
>> important reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage.
>
> The "modern" view of marriage doesn't benefit anyone.
My wife and I both benefit from it, both socially and legally. Your
assertion is simply not correct.
> I don't understand how people in my grandparents' generation can get married
> hardly knowing each other but stay together a lifetime, yet now people get
> married after getting to know each other very well and then they end up
> getting divorced.
It is called freedom. There are downsides to it, you know...
#233
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C6A09B12602xomicron@0.0.0.1 on
4/9/04 12:47 PM:
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> news:BC9C4044.4800B%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
>> 4/9/04 11:56 AM:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in
>>>>>> Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into
>>>>>>>> binding, lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue
>>>>>>>> to have our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your
>>>>>>>> promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for wanting to commit to
>>>>>>>> monogamy."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did
>>>> so), what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has
>>>> a loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary
>>>> instead of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your
>>>> marriage, assuming you are married?
>>>
>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you
>>> liberals have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>
>> Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an
>> important reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage.
>
> The "modern" view of marriage doesn't benefit anyone.
My wife and I both benefit from it, both socially and legally. Your
assertion is simply not correct.
> I don't understand how people in my grandparents' generation can get married
> hardly knowing each other but stay together a lifetime, yet now people get
> married after getting to know each other very well and then they end up
> getting divorced.
It is called freedom. There are downsides to it, you know...
4/9/04 12:47 PM:
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> news:BC9C4044.4800B%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
>> 4/9/04 11:56 AM:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in
>>>>>> Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into
>>>>>>>> binding, lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue
>>>>>>>> to have our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your
>>>>>>>> promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for wanting to commit to
>>>>>>>> monogamy."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did
>>>> so), what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has
>>>> a loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary
>>>> instead of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your
>>>> marriage, assuming you are married?
>>>
>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you
>>> liberals have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>
>> Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an
>> important reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage.
>
> The "modern" view of marriage doesn't benefit anyone.
My wife and I both benefit from it, both socially and legally. Your
assertion is simply not correct.
> I don't understand how people in my grandparents' generation can get married
> hardly knowing each other but stay together a lifetime, yet now people get
> married after getting to know each other very well and then they end up
> getting divorced.
It is called freedom. There are downsides to it, you know...
#234
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-3A8713.11175809042004@orngc...3.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 2:17 PM:
> In article <BC9C41BE.4800F%snit@nospam-cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> "David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>>>> assuming you are married?
>>>>
>>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>>>> have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>>
>>> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
>>> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
>>> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
>>> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?
>>
>> Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
>> allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)
>
> I realize you were trying to make a joke, Snit, but I found your comment
> to be in poor taste and unfunny in the extreme.
My sincere apologies. Right after I hit send I regretted it... please do
take any my apology as sincere.
dfritzin-3A8713.11175809042004@orngc...3.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 2:17 PM:
> In article <BC9C41BE.4800F%snit@nospam-cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> "David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>>>> assuming you are married?
>>>>
>>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>>>> have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>>
>>> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
>>> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
>>> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
>>> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?
>>
>> Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
>> allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)
>
> I realize you were trying to make a joke, Snit, but I found your comment
> to be in poor taste and unfunny in the extreme.
My sincere apologies. Right after I hit send I regretted it... please do
take any my apology as sincere.
#235
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-3A8713.11175809042004@orngc...3.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 2:17 PM:
> In article <BC9C41BE.4800F%snit@nospam-cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> "David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>>>> assuming you are married?
>>>>
>>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>>>> have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>>
>>> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
>>> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
>>> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
>>> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?
>>
>> Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
>> allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)
>
> I realize you were trying to make a joke, Snit, but I found your comment
> to be in poor taste and unfunny in the extreme.
My sincere apologies. Right after I hit send I regretted it... please do
take any my apology as sincere.
dfritzin-3A8713.11175809042004@orngc...3.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 2:17 PM:
> In article <BC9C41BE.4800F%snit@nospam-cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> "David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>>>> assuming you are married?
>>>>
>>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>>>> have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>>
>>> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
>>> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
>>> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
>>> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?
>>
>> Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
>> allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)
>
> I realize you were trying to make a joke, Snit, but I found your comment
> to be in poor taste and unfunny in the extreme.
My sincere apologies. Right after I hit send I regretted it... please do
take any my apology as sincere.
#236
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-3A8713.11175809042004@orngc...3.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 2:17 PM:
> In article <BC9C41BE.4800F%snit@nospam-cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> "David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>>>> assuming you are married?
>>>>
>>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>>>> have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>>
>>> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
>>> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
>>> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
>>> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?
>>
>> Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
>> allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)
>
> I realize you were trying to make a joke, Snit, but I found your comment
> to be in poor taste and unfunny in the extreme.
My sincere apologies. Right after I hit send I regretted it... please do
take any my apology as sincere.
dfritzin-3A8713.11175809042004@orngc...3.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 2:17 PM:
> In article <BC9C41BE.4800F%snit@nospam-cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> "David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>>>> assuming you are married?
>>>>
>>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>>>> have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>>
>>> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
>>> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
>>> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
>>> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?
>>
>> Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
>> allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)
>
> I realize you were trying to make a joke, Snit, but I found your comment
> to be in poor taste and unfunny in the extreme.
My sincere apologies. Right after I hit send I regretted it... please do
take any my apology as sincere.
#237
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-3A8713.11175809042004@orngc...3.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 2:17 PM:
> In article <BC9C41BE.4800F%snit@nospam-cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> "David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>>>> assuming you are married?
>>>>
>>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>>>> have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>>
>>> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
>>> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
>>> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
>>> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?
>>
>> Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
>> allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)
>
> I realize you were trying to make a joke, Snit, but I found your comment
> to be in poor taste and unfunny in the extreme.
My sincere apologies. Right after I hit send I regretted it... please do
take any my apology as sincere.
dfritzin-3A8713.11175809042004@orngc...3.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 2:17 PM:
> In article <BC9C41BE.4800F%snit@nospam-cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> "David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>>>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>>>> assuming you are married?
>>>>
>>>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>>>> have such a shallow view of marriage.
>>>
>>> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
>>> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
>>> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
>>> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?
>>
>> Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
>> allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)
>
> I realize you were trying to make a joke, Snit, but I found your comment
> to be in poor taste and unfunny in the extreme.
My sincere apologies. Right after I hit send I regretted it... please do
take any my apology as sincere.
#238
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Dennis" <Howdy Doody@howdydoody.net> wrote in
107e5injp4cgtdd@corp.supernews.com on 4/9/04 2:32 PM:
> In article <BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net>, snit@nospam-cableone.net
> says...
>>
>>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>
>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>
>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>
>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>
>> Just not to the person they want to. Are you advocating making a sham of
>> the whole concept of marriage? I hold marriage, at least in a modern
>> society, to a higher standard.
>>
>
> If the institution of marriage is so sacred as certain people would like us to
> believe, then why do half of the marriages end in divorce? The whole concept
> of marriage is somewhat of a fiction, because of the divorce rate(at least in
> the US). Let's get real.I would bet that those who oppose marriage of gays, do
> so not to preserve the so called "concept of marriage", but really oppose
> homosexulality. Homosexuality has always been with us, and always will be.
> The homophobes need to deal with thier own inner fears.
I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
107e5injp4cgtdd@corp.supernews.com on 4/9/04 2:32 PM:
> In article <BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net>, snit@nospam-cableone.net
> says...
>>
>>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>
>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>
>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>
>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>
>> Just not to the person they want to. Are you advocating making a sham of
>> the whole concept of marriage? I hold marriage, at least in a modern
>> society, to a higher standard.
>>
>
> If the institution of marriage is so sacred as certain people would like us to
> believe, then why do half of the marriages end in divorce? The whole concept
> of marriage is somewhat of a fiction, because of the divorce rate(at least in
> the US). Let's get real.I would bet that those who oppose marriage of gays, do
> so not to preserve the so called "concept of marriage", but really oppose
> homosexulality. Homosexuality has always been with us, and always will be.
> The homophobes need to deal with thier own inner fears.
I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
#239
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Dennis" <Howdy Doody@howdydoody.net> wrote in
107e5injp4cgtdd@corp.supernews.com on 4/9/04 2:32 PM:
> In article <BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net>, snit@nospam-cableone.net
> says...
>>
>>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>
>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>
>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>
>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>
>> Just not to the person they want to. Are you advocating making a sham of
>> the whole concept of marriage? I hold marriage, at least in a modern
>> society, to a higher standard.
>>
>
> If the institution of marriage is so sacred as certain people would like us to
> believe, then why do half of the marriages end in divorce? The whole concept
> of marriage is somewhat of a fiction, because of the divorce rate(at least in
> the US). Let's get real.I would bet that those who oppose marriage of gays, do
> so not to preserve the so called "concept of marriage", but really oppose
> homosexulality. Homosexuality has always been with us, and always will be.
> The homophobes need to deal with thier own inner fears.
I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
107e5injp4cgtdd@corp.supernews.com on 4/9/04 2:32 PM:
> In article <BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net>, snit@nospam-cableone.net
> says...
>>
>>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>
>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>
>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>
>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>
>> Just not to the person they want to. Are you advocating making a sham of
>> the whole concept of marriage? I hold marriage, at least in a modern
>> society, to a higher standard.
>>
>
> If the institution of marriage is so sacred as certain people would like us to
> believe, then why do half of the marriages end in divorce? The whole concept
> of marriage is somewhat of a fiction, because of the divorce rate(at least in
> the US). Let's get real.I would bet that those who oppose marriage of gays, do
> so not to preserve the so called "concept of marriage", but really oppose
> homosexulality. Homosexuality has always been with us, and always will be.
> The homophobes need to deal with thier own inner fears.
I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
#240
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Dennis" <Howdy Doody@howdydoody.net> wrote in
107e5injp4cgtdd@corp.supernews.com on 4/9/04 2:32 PM:
> In article <BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net>, snit@nospam-cableone.net
> says...
>>
>>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>
>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>
>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>
>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>
>> Just not to the person they want to. Are you advocating making a sham of
>> the whole concept of marriage? I hold marriage, at least in a modern
>> society, to a higher standard.
>>
>
> If the institution of marriage is so sacred as certain people would like us to
> believe, then why do half of the marriages end in divorce? The whole concept
> of marriage is somewhat of a fiction, because of the divorce rate(at least in
> the US). Let's get real.I would bet that those who oppose marriage of gays, do
> so not to preserve the so called "concept of marriage", but really oppose
> homosexulality. Homosexuality has always been with us, and always will be.
> The homophobes need to deal with thier own inner fears.
I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.
107e5injp4cgtdd@corp.supernews.com on 4/9/04 2:32 PM:
> In article <BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net>, snit@nospam-cableone.net
> says...
>>
>>
>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>
>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>
>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>
>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>
>> Just not to the person they want to. Are you advocating making a sham of
>> the whole concept of marriage? I hold marriage, at least in a modern
>> society, to a higher standard.
>>
>
> If the institution of marriage is so sacred as certain people would like us to
> believe, then why do half of the marriages end in divorce? The whole concept
> of marriage is somewhat of a fiction, because of the divorce rate(at least in
> the US). Let's get real.I would bet that those who oppose marriage of gays, do
> so not to preserve the so called "concept of marriage", but really oppose
> homosexulality. Homosexuality has always been with us, and always will be.
> The homophobes need to deal with thier own inner fears.
I have yet to see a reasoned explanation of why homosexual marriage is bad
that does not rely on homophobia or other forms of bigotry. There have been
a couple of trolls who have claimed that they have other reasons, but they
give themselves away by claiming gays are parasites or other such nonsense.