Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/%5Bot%5D-no-fresh-meat-florida-faggots-12861/)

Snit 04-09-2004 02:57 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
4/9/04 11:56 AM:

> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>
>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>
>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>
>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>
>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>
>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>
>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>
>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.

>>
>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>> assuming you are married?

>
> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
> have such a shallow view of marriage.


Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an important
reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage. Are you claiming
love is not an important aspect in a marriage?


Snit 04-09-2004 02:57 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
4/9/04 11:56 AM:

> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>
>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>
>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>
>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>
>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>
>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>
>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>
>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.

>>
>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>> assuming you are married?

>
> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
> have such a shallow view of marriage.


Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an important
reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage. Are you claiming
love is not an important aspect in a marriage?


Snit 04-09-2004 02:57 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
4/9/04 11:56 AM:

> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>
>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>
>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>
>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>
>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>
>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>
>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>
>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.

>>
>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>> assuming you are married?

>
> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
> have such a shallow view of marriage.


Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an important
reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage. Are you claiming
love is not an important aspect in a marriage?


David Fritzinger 04-09-2004 03:00 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>
> > In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> >> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
> >>
> >> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
> >> > on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
> >> >
> >> >> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
> >> >> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
> >> >>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
> >> >>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
> >> >>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
> >> >>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
> >> >>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
> >> >>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
> >> >>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
> >> >>
> >> >> Homosexuals can already get married.
> >> >
> >> > Just not to the person they want to.
> >>
> >> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
> >>
> >> > Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
> >>
> >> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.

> >
> > Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> > what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> > loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> > of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> > assuming you are married?

>
> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
> have such a shallow view of marriage.


So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?

--
Dave Fritzinger

David Fritzinger 04-09-2004 03:00 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>
> > In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> >> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
> >>
> >> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
> >> > on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
> >> >
> >> >> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
> >> >> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
> >> >>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
> >> >>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
> >> >>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
> >> >>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
> >> >>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
> >> >>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
> >> >>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
> >> >>
> >> >> Homosexuals can already get married.
> >> >
> >> > Just not to the person they want to.
> >>
> >> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
> >>
> >> > Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
> >>
> >> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.

> >
> > Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> > what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> > loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> > of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> > assuming you are married?

>
> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
> have such a shallow view of marriage.


So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?

--
Dave Fritzinger

David Fritzinger 04-09-2004 03:00 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>
> > In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> >> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
> >>
> >> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
> >> > on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
> >> >
> >> >> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
> >> >> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
> >> >>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
> >> >>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
> >> >>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
> >> >>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
> >> >>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
> >> >>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
> >> >>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
> >> >>
> >> >> Homosexuals can already get married.
> >> >
> >> > Just not to the person they want to.
> >>
> >> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
> >>
> >> > Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
> >>
> >> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.

> >
> > Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> > what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> > loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> > of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> > assuming you are married?

>
> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
> have such a shallow view of marriage.


So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?

--
Dave Fritzinger

David Fritzinger 04-09-2004 03:00 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>
> > In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> >> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
> >>
> >> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
> >> > on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
> >> >
> >> >> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
> >> >> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
> >> >>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
> >> >>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
> >> >>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
> >> >>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
> >> >>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
> >> >>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
> >> >>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
> >> >>
> >> >> Homosexuals can already get married.
> >> >
> >> > Just not to the person they want to.
> >>
> >> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
> >>
> >> > Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
> >>
> >> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.

> >
> > Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> > what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> > loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> > of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> > assuming you are married?

>
> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
> have such a shallow view of marriage.


So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?

--
Dave Fritzinger

Snit 04-09-2004 03:04 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
PM:

> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>
>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>
>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>
>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>
>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>
>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>
>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>> assuming you are married?

>>
>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>> have such a shallow view of marriage.

>
> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?


Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)


Snit 04-09-2004 03:04 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
PM:

> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>
>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>
>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>
>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>
>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>
>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>
>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>> assuming you are married?

>>
>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>> have such a shallow view of marriage.

>
> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?


Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)


Snit 04-09-2004 03:04 PM

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 
"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-DE107F.09004809042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 12:00
PM:

> In article <Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
>> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>>
>>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>>
>>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>>
>>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>>
>>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>>
>>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>>
>>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>>> assuming you are married?

>>
>> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
>> have such a shallow view of marriage.

>
> So, what *is* the reason for marriage? Is it just to produce children?
> If so, many people shouldn't be married, including my (now deceased)
> father and step-mother, since he was in his 60s and she in her late 40s
> when they married. Who should be allowed to marry, oh great Snubis?


Well, here I am going to jump in. Your now deceased father should not be
allowed to marry, as I doubt he could give consent. :)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.07503 seconds with 3 queries