Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>
> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
> > 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
> >
> >> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
> >> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
> >>
> >>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
> >>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
> >>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
> >>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
> >>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
> >>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
> >>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
> >>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
> >>
> >> Homosexuals can already get married.
> >
> > Just not to the person they want to.
>
> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>
> > Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>
> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.

Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
assuming you are married? It certainly doesn't weaken my marriage. And,
I don't see how it hurts society. So, answer the question, Snubis, how
does homosexual marriage hurt heterosexual marriage, or weaken the bonds
between a man and wife?

--
Dave Fritzinger

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 11:50
AM:

> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>
>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>
>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>
>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>
>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>
>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>
>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>
>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>
>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>
> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> assuming you are married? It certainly doesn't weaken my marriage. And,
> I don't see how it hurts society. So, answer the question, Snubis, how
> does homosexual marriage hurt heterosexual marriage, or weaken the bonds
> between a man and wife?

And more than that, why would encouraging sham marriages, as he seems to be
doing by commenting that gays can already marry, help anything.

Now it is possible I misinterpreted his statement - he may be in reference
to the places where gays can marry... in which case I can accept that my
comments are not accurate. Somehow, though, I doubt that is what was meant.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 11:50
AM:

> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>
>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>
>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>
>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>
>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>
>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>
>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>
>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>
>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>
> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> assuming you are married? It certainly doesn't weaken my marriage. And,
> I don't see how it hurts society. So, answer the question, Snubis, how
> does homosexual marriage hurt heterosexual marriage, or weaken the bonds
> between a man and wife?

And more than that, why would encouraging sham marriages, as he seems to be
doing by commenting that gays can already marry, help anything.

Now it is possible I misinterpreted his statement - he may be in reference
to the places where gays can marry... in which case I can accept that my
comments are not accurate. Somehow, though, I doubt that is what was meant.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 11:50
AM:

> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>
>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>
>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>
>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>
>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>
>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>
>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>
>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>
>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>
> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> assuming you are married? It certainly doesn't weaken my marriage. And,
> I don't see how it hurts society. So, answer the question, Snubis, how
> does homosexual marriage hurt heterosexual marriage, or weaken the bonds
> between a man and wife?

And more than that, why would encouraging sham marriages, as he seems to be
doing by commenting that gays can already marry, help anything.

Now it is possible I misinterpreted his statement - he may be in reference
to the places where gays can marry... in which case I can accept that my
comments are not accurate. Somehow, though, I doubt that is what was meant.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngc...4.socal.rr.com on 4/9/04 11:50
AM:

> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>
>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3 on
>>> 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>
>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>
>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT gay
>>>>> marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live among us
>>>>> without having to worry quite so much about being firebombed, but
>>>>> we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more subtle ways, like
>>>>> denying the respectability to enter into binding, lifelong personal
>>>>> committments. That way we can continue to have our cake and eat it
>>>>> too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and* bashing y'all for
>>>>> wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>
>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>
>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>
>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>
>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>
>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>
> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> assuming you are married? It certainly doesn't weaken my marriage. And,
> I don't see how it hurts society. So, answer the question, Snubis, how
> does homosexual marriage hurt heterosexual marriage, or weaken the bonds
> between a man and wife?

And more than that, why would encouraging sham marriages, as he seems to be
doing by commenting that gays can already marry, help anything.

Now it is possible I misinterpreted his statement - he may be in reference
to the places where gays can marry... in which case I can accept that my
comments are not accurate. Somehow, though, I doubt that is what was meant.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:

> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>
>> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>> > on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>> >
>> >> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>> >> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>> >>
>> >>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>> >>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>> >>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>> >>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>> >>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>> >>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>> >>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>> >>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>> >>
>> >> Homosexuals can already get married.
>> >
>> > Just not to the person they want to.
>>
>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>
>> > Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>
>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>
> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> assuming you are married?

You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
have such a shallow view of marriage.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:

> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>
>> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>> > on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>> >
>> >> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>> >> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>> >>
>> >>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>> >>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>> >>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>> >>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>> >>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>> >>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>> >>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>> >>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>> >>
>> >> Homosexuals can already get married.
>> >
>> > Just not to the person they want to.
>>
>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>
>> > Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>
>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>
> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> assuming you are married?

You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
have such a shallow view of marriage.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:

> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>
>> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>> > on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>> >
>> >> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>> >> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>> >>
>> >>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>> >>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>> >>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>> >>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>> >>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>> >>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>> >>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>> >>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>> >>
>> >> Homosexuals can already get married.
>> >
>> > Just not to the person they want to.
>>
>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>
>> > Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>
>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>
> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> assuming you are married?

You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
have such a shallow view of marriage.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:

> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>
>> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>> > on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>> >
>> >> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>> >> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>> >>
>> >>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>> >>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>> >>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>> >>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>> >>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>> >>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>> >>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>> >>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>> >>
>> >> Homosexuals can already get married.
>> >
>> > Just not to the person they want to.
>>
>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>
>> > Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>
>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>
> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
> assuming you are married?

You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
have such a shallow view of marriage.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C697EAF4AABxomicron@0.0.0.1 on
4/9/04 11:56 AM:

> David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote in
> news:dfritzin-C58307.08502609042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com:
>
>> In article <Xns94C6854973AA8xomicron@0.0.0.1>,
>> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> Snit <snit@nospam-cableone.net> wrote in
>>> news:BC9C1E8B.47E76%snit@nospam-cableone.net:
>>>
>>>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in Xns94C67C4B7FDB7xomicron@0.0.0.3
>>>> on 4/9/04 9:12 AM:
>>>>
>>>>> da_bender@hotmail.com (Dirk) wrote in
>>>>> news:f1e3e17f.0404090630.690d483b@posting.google.c om:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rather, it's almost exactly like the current fundie platform WRT
>>>>>> gay marriage--"Ok, we'll permit you damned-to-Hell queers to live
>>>>>> among us without having to worry quite so much about being
>>>>>> firebombed, but we'll reserve the right to slight y'all in more
>>>>>> subtle ways, like denying the respectability to enter into binding,
>>>>>> lifelong personal committments. That way we can continue to have
>>>>>> our cake and eat it too--bashing y'all for your promiscuity, *and*
>>>>>> bashing y'all for wanting to commit to monogamy."
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
>>>>
>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
>>>
>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
>>>
>>>> Are you advocating making a sham of the whole concept of marriage?
>>>
>>> Homosexuals are already trying to do that.
>>
>> Again, I have to ask (since you never answered the last time I did so),
>> what is so wrong with homosexual marriage? If the couple that has a
>> loving relationship next door happens to be, so Jo-anne and Mary instead
>> of John and Mary, how does this hurt you, or weaken your marriage,
>> assuming you are married?
>
> You think that love is the only reason for marriage? No wonder you liberals
> have such a shallow view of marriage.

Nobody has suggested it is the only reason, but to deny it as an important
reason does not fit with the modern view of marriage. Are you claiming
love is not an important aspect in a marriage?