Re: Yep, its time to move on.
"Bertie the Bunyip" <Sn@rt.1> wrote in message news:Xns99EC6A678E8ECpissupropeeh@207.14.116.130.. . > "DougW" <I.only.read.usenet@invalid.address> wrote in news:p9T%i.25383 > $L15.18689@newsfe08.phx: > >> John wrote: >>> DougW, >>> you are right. We need a new group. Bill and the ones who incite >>> him are ruining this group. I can only hope Bill and his gang wont >>> follow us to the new group. >> >> They can't if it is moderated. Problem is that takes time for those >> that do the moderation/aproval of posts. I need to check on what >> robomoderation software is out there. With a constant-on connection >> it would be fairly easy for me to provide root moderation. >> > > Well, you don't need it and besies that moderated groups are crap. this is > what I'd call a really useful group and all you have to do is learn to use > a killfile. If you're reading this then you aren't doing it and you should > be! > Killfiling has a lot of advantages over moderation, not the least of which > is you can still have a few squabbles going on that spin out some good > info > which you won't get in a moderated group. Most improtantly, moderated > groups are BORING! > By the time a person slog's through all the crap in this ng they leave before they bother with a kf. You folks had a decent group in the past. Actually that's why I wandered into it, as I'd been here before and now was looking for info in a cj. But you have one ------- here and he's totally out of control, why sombody hasn't gone to his house and smacked him is beyond me. Then again most won't bother with a kf, so why bother going to his house, just move to another group. Which is what most of those with expertise and info to offer have done. Screwing with the coward is mildly entertaining for a bit but.... > Bertie |
Re: Yep, its time to move on.
nospam@zero.com (Peter Parker) wrote in news:47403a90_2@nntp2.nac.net:
> In article <Xns99EC6A678E8ECpissupropeeh@207.14.116.130>, > Bertie the Bunyip <Sn@rt.1> wrote: >>"DougW" <I.only.read.usenet@invalid.address> wrote in news:p9T%i.25383 >>$L15.18689@newsfe08.phx: >> >>> John wrote: >>>> DougW, >>>> you are right. We need a new group. Bill and the ones who incite >>>> him are ruining this group. I can only hope Bill and his gang wont >>>> follow us to the new group. >>> >>> They can't if it is moderated. Problem is that takes time for those >>> that do the moderation/aproval of posts. I need to check on what >>> robomoderation software is out there. With a constant-on connection >>> it would be fairly easy for me to provide root moderation. >>> >> >>Well, you don't need it and besies that moderated groups are crap. >>this is what I'd call a really useful group and all you have to do is >>learn to use a killfile. If you're reading this then you aren't doing >>it and you should be! >>Killfiling has a lot of advantages over moderation, not the least of >>which is you can still have a few squabbles going on that spin out >>some good info which you won't get in a moderated group. Most >>improtantly, moderated groups are BORING! >> >> >>Bertie > > I would have to agree with you there. Moderation has always been less > appealing to me. Killfiles are okay except now with mass produced fake > from lines and subject generators, it's hard to keep up. It would be > nice to see another level of blocking that can be done by a super user > at times but then again, it becomes moderated. Nah, Billy isn;'t brigth enough to frog and it's al centered around him. Eleminate his ---- and all of us around him and about 95% of your problem, if not more, is gone. Bertie > |
Re: Yep, its time to move on.
nospam@zero.com (Peter Parker) wrote in news:47403a90_2@nntp2.nac.net:
> In article <Xns99EC6A678E8ECpissupropeeh@207.14.116.130>, > Bertie the Bunyip <Sn@rt.1> wrote: >>"DougW" <I.only.read.usenet@invalid.address> wrote in news:p9T%i.25383 >>$L15.18689@newsfe08.phx: >> >>> John wrote: >>>> DougW, >>>> you are right. We need a new group. Bill and the ones who incite >>>> him are ruining this group. I can only hope Bill and his gang wont >>>> follow us to the new group. >>> >>> They can't if it is moderated. Problem is that takes time for those >>> that do the moderation/aproval of posts. I need to check on what >>> robomoderation software is out there. With a constant-on connection >>> it would be fairly easy for me to provide root moderation. >>> >> >>Well, you don't need it and besies that moderated groups are crap. >>this is what I'd call a really useful group and all you have to do is >>learn to use a killfile. If you're reading this then you aren't doing >>it and you should be! >>Killfiling has a lot of advantages over moderation, not the least of >>which is you can still have a few squabbles going on that spin out >>some good info which you won't get in a moderated group. Most >>improtantly, moderated groups are BORING! >> >> >>Bertie > > I would have to agree with you there. Moderation has always been less > appealing to me. Killfiles are okay except now with mass produced fake > from lines and subject generators, it's hard to keep up. It would be > nice to see another level of blocking that can be done by a super user > at times but then again, it becomes moderated. Nah, Billy isn;'t brigth enough to frog and it's al centered around him. Eleminate his ---- and all of us around him and about 95% of your problem, if not more, is gone. Bertie > |
Re: Yep, its time to move on.
"John" <here@there.com> wrote in
news:474042de$0$8650$4c368faf@roadrunner.com: > Peter, > > forgive my ignorance but how do you killfile someone? I see lots of > people talking about killfile, but I have no idea how to do it. It > would be nice to be able to filter out Bill and his gang and only see > legitimate Jeep messages. Also, I see where Bertie says it makes a > difference if you report someone to the abuse email. How do you > report abuse and does it make a difference? If it did, it would seem > to me that Bill would be blocked from the group. Bill, don't worry, > I'm not going to report you. I figure you've been reported enough. > Yet, you are still here. > > Reporting abuse is easy. there;s an e-mail addie in the headers telling you who to send it to . in any case it'd be abuse@whatever.com First, stop using Outlok express and get a free copy of x-news off the net. Much asier to use in every way once you get used to it. It has an excellent killfile option that I never use myself (well what would be the point?) Bertie |
Re: Yep, its time to move on.
"John" <here@there.com> wrote in
news:474042de$0$8650$4c368faf@roadrunner.com: > Peter, > > forgive my ignorance but how do you killfile someone? I see lots of > people talking about killfile, but I have no idea how to do it. It > would be nice to be able to filter out Bill and his gang and only see > legitimate Jeep messages. Also, I see where Bertie says it makes a > difference if you report someone to the abuse email. How do you > report abuse and does it make a difference? If it did, it would seem > to me that Bill would be blocked from the group. Bill, don't worry, > I'm not going to report you. I figure you've been reported enough. > Yet, you are still here. > > Reporting abuse is easy. there;s an e-mail addie in the headers telling you who to send it to . in any case it'd be abuse@whatever.com First, stop using Outlok express and get a free copy of x-news off the net. Much asier to use in every way once you get used to it. It has an excellent killfile option that I never use myself (well what would be the point?) Bertie |
Re: Yep, its time to move on.
Bill sees himself as King Canute, sweeping back the sea of morons.
Dave "Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message news:473f9ef2_2@nntp2.nac.net... > What the hell is going on with this group? I'm gone for a couple of years and > look what happens... |
Re: Yep, its time to move on.
Bill sees himself as King Canute, sweeping back the sea of morons.
Dave "Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message news:473f9ef2_2@nntp2.nac.net... > What the hell is going on with this group? I'm gone for a couple of years and > look what happens... |
Re: Yep, its time to move on.
In article <474042de$0$8650$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
John <here@there.com> wrote: >Peter, > >forgive my ignorance but how do you killfile someone? I see lots of people >talking about killfile, but I have no idea how to do it. It would be nice >to be able to filter out Bill and his gang and only see legitimate Jeep >messages. Also, I see where Bertie says it makes a difference if you report >someone to the abuse email. How do you report abuse and does it make a >difference? If it did, it would seem to me that Bill would be blocked from >the group. Bill, don't worry, I'm not going to report you. I figure you've >been reported enough. Yet, you are still here. > > > >Thanks > >John Hi John- Kill files are used in news readers. I checked your headers and you seem to be using Outlook. I don't use outlook but I am sure outlook has a command that allows you to place either the addressor or the subject line into a filter so you don't see those posts when it scans. It's just like emails going into a junk or bulk file. The problem with kill files is that almost all abuse posts are faked or generated so they are unique every time they post. This is how they get through the filtering. -- Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice... |
Re: Yep, its time to move on.
In article <474042de$0$8650$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
John <here@there.com> wrote: >Peter, > >forgive my ignorance but how do you killfile someone? I see lots of people >talking about killfile, but I have no idea how to do it. It would be nice >to be able to filter out Bill and his gang and only see legitimate Jeep >messages. Also, I see where Bertie says it makes a difference if you report >someone to the abuse email. How do you report abuse and does it make a >difference? If it did, it would seem to me that Bill would be blocked from >the group. Bill, don't worry, I'm not going to report you. I figure you've >been reported enough. Yet, you are still here. > > > >Thanks > >John Hi John- Kill files are used in news readers. I checked your headers and you seem to be using Outlook. I don't use outlook but I am sure outlook has a command that allows you to place either the addressor or the subject line into a filter so you don't see those posts when it scans. It's just like emails going into a junk or bulk file. The problem with kill files is that almost all abuse posts are faked or generated so they are unique every time they post. This is how they get through the filtering. -- Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice... |
Re: Yep, its time to move on.
In article <95Y%i.133629$vI1.70275@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> ,
Dave Milne <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote: >Bill sees himself as King Canute, sweeping back the sea of morons. > >Dave ROFLMAO!!!! Bill has always been stubborn. ;) The goat posting guy has been on his ass for a few years now. I've checked my kill file and sure enough the goat shyte is in there. > >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message >news:473f9ef2_2@nntp2.nac.net... >> What the hell is going on with this group? I'm gone for a couple of years >and >> look what happens... > > -- Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands