Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   WJ Issues (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/wj-issues-24708/)

HarryS 02-12-2005 03:15 PM

Re: WJ Issues
 
Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked his
WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I guess
that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
jacking points to be on the tubes.

HarryS

"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:cqsPd.8502$Ps.8075@okepread06...
> claudel did pass the time by typing:
>> DougW wrote:

>
>>> DC used thin wall tubes and only pressed them into the pumpkin with
>>> half assed plug welds to keep the tube from rotating. Jacking from
>>> the diff can bend the axle assembly taking the bearings and seals out
>>> of alignment just enough to cause excessive wear. Older thick wall
>>> steel (welded) axles didn't have that weakness.

>>
>> Which diffs are susceptible to this?

>
> For the most part they all are. Car makers have cut weight where
> they can and that has created weaknesses in what used to be your basic
> hunk of iron. Now diffs are aluminum and the tubes are thinner.
>
> It's just not a good idea to ever jack from the pumpkin. They make
> trusses to strengthen axles for larger tires and off road bumps.
> Some bolt, some weld.
>
> homemade one
> http://www.greatcj8.com/mytruss.jpg
>
> commercial unit
> http://www.mosesludel.com/news/index...tid=4&blogid=1
> down in product reviews.
>
> --
> DougW
>




L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 02-12-2005 04:32 PM

Re: WJ Issues
 
They switched back to an cast iron rear housing and Real wheel
bearing for the WJ, at least by '02.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

HarryS wrote:
>
> Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked his
> WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
> newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I guess
> that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
> damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
> jacking points to be on the tubes.
>
> HarryS


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 02-12-2005 04:32 PM

Re: WJ Issues
 
They switched back to an cast iron rear housing and Real wheel
bearing for the WJ, at least by '02.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

HarryS wrote:
>
> Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked his
> WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
> newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I guess
> that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
> damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
> jacking points to be on the tubes.
>
> HarryS


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 02-12-2005 04:32 PM

Re: WJ Issues
 
They switched back to an cast iron rear housing and Real wheel
bearing for the WJ, at least by '02.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

HarryS wrote:
>
> Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked his
> WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
> newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I guess
> that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
> damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
> jacking points to be on the tubes.
>
> HarryS


DougW 02-12-2005 10:50 PM

Re: WJ Issues
 
HarryS did pass the time by typing:
> Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked his
> WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
> newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I guess
> that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
> damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
> jacking points to be on the tubes.


If I have to jack on the tubes it's usually directly under the shock mounts,
or as close as I can get, so as to put the most force directly up and on the
suspension.

Got to agree it was hard for me not to jack from the diff. Did it all the time
in my old chevy. It was a dealership mechanic that warned me of jacking under
the diff when I was in there for some warranty work.

My solution was to get a 3ton floor lift. Just using the frame points it can
bring the wheels a good 6" off the ground.

The only time I have jacked under the diff was to raise/lower the axle for
some suspension work. And then it was just the axles weight. The ZJ was up
on jack stands.

--
DougW



DougW 02-12-2005 10:50 PM

Re: WJ Issues
 
HarryS did pass the time by typing:
> Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked his
> WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
> newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I guess
> that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
> damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
> jacking points to be on the tubes.


If I have to jack on the tubes it's usually directly under the shock mounts,
or as close as I can get, so as to put the most force directly up and on the
suspension.

Got to agree it was hard for me not to jack from the diff. Did it all the time
in my old chevy. It was a dealership mechanic that warned me of jacking under
the diff when I was in there for some warranty work.

My solution was to get a 3ton floor lift. Just using the frame points it can
bring the wheels a good 6" off the ground.

The only time I have jacked under the diff was to raise/lower the axle for
some suspension work. And then it was just the axles weight. The ZJ was up
on jack stands.

--
DougW



DougW 02-12-2005 10:50 PM

Re: WJ Issues
 
HarryS did pass the time by typing:
> Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked his
> WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
> newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I guess
> that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
> damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
> jacking points to be on the tubes.


If I have to jack on the tubes it's usually directly under the shock mounts,
or as close as I can get, so as to put the most force directly up and on the
suspension.

Got to agree it was hard for me not to jack from the diff. Did it all the time
in my old chevy. It was a dealership mechanic that warned me of jacking under
the diff when I was in there for some warranty work.

My solution was to get a 3ton floor lift. Just using the frame points it can
bring the wheels a good 6" off the ground.

The only time I have jacked under the diff was to raise/lower the axle for
some suspension work. And then it was just the axles weight. The ZJ was up
on jack stands.

--
DougW



HarryS 02-13-2005 06:55 AM

Re: WJ Issues
 
Good points I will pass it on.

HarryS


"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:88APd.8519$Ps.2958@okepread06...
> HarryS did pass the time by typing:
>> Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked
>> his
>> WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
>> newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I
>> guess
>> that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
>> damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
>> jacking points to be on the tubes.

>
> If I have to jack on the tubes it's usually directly under the shock
> mounts,
> or as close as I can get, so as to put the most force directly up and on
> the
> suspension.
>
> Got to agree it was hard for me not to jack from the diff. Did it all the
> time
> in my old chevy. It was a dealership mechanic that warned me of jacking
> under
> the diff when I was in there for some warranty work.
>
> My solution was to get a 3ton floor lift. Just using the frame points it
> can
> bring the wheels a good 6" off the ground.
>
> The only time I have jacked under the diff was to raise/lower the axle for
> some suspension work. And then it was just the axles weight. The ZJ was
> up
> on jack stands.
>
> --
> DougW
>




HarryS 02-13-2005 06:55 AM

Re: WJ Issues
 
Good points I will pass it on.

HarryS


"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:88APd.8519$Ps.2958@okepread06...
> HarryS did pass the time by typing:
>> Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked
>> his
>> WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
>> newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I
>> guess
>> that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
>> damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
>> jacking points to be on the tubes.

>
> If I have to jack on the tubes it's usually directly under the shock
> mounts,
> or as close as I can get, so as to put the most force directly up and on
> the
> suspension.
>
> Got to agree it was hard for me not to jack from the diff. Did it all the
> time
> in my old chevy. It was a dealership mechanic that warned me of jacking
> under
> the diff when I was in there for some warranty work.
>
> My solution was to get a 3ton floor lift. Just using the frame points it
> can
> bring the wheels a good 6" off the ground.
>
> The only time I have jacked under the diff was to raise/lower the axle for
> some suspension work. And then it was just the axles weight. The ZJ was
> up
> on jack stands.
>
> --
> DougW
>




HarryS 02-13-2005 06:55 AM

Re: WJ Issues
 
Good points I will pass it on.

HarryS


"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:88APd.8519$Ps.2958@okepread06...
> HarryS did pass the time by typing:
>> Well it does make sense I had talked to my friend and he said he jacked
>> his
>> WJ by the pumpkin all the time. I told him about the replays on the
>> newsgroup. He was kinda pissed that he may have caused the damage. I
>> guess
>> that is why jacking points are specified in the O&M. I was wondering if
>> damage can be done by jacking the tube near the wheel? The TJ shows the
>> jacking points to be on the tubes.

>
> If I have to jack on the tubes it's usually directly under the shock
> mounts,
> or as close as I can get, so as to put the most force directly up and on
> the
> suspension.
>
> Got to agree it was hard for me not to jack from the diff. Did it all the
> time
> in my old chevy. It was a dealership mechanic that warned me of jacking
> under
> the diff when I was in there for some warranty work.
>
> My solution was to get a 3ton floor lift. Just using the frame points it
> can
> bring the wheels a good 6" off the ground.
>
> The only time I have jacked under the diff was to raise/lower the axle for
> some suspension work. And then it was just the axles weight. The ZJ was
> up
> on jack stands.
>
> --
> DougW
>





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.06466 seconds with 5 queries