Re: Willys Questions..
>From: "John D"
>Went to look at the Willys today. It is a 1961 CJ3B, Has a PTO on it. >There are 4 shifters on the floor. It is a 3 speed. It has a fiberglass >top, no roll bar. It is an orange color. 70k original miles. >I think I am going to hold out for a better looking CJ5 I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.) In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase) with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44 front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess you might call the end result a CJ-6B.) Robert Bills KG6LMV Orange County CA '83 CJ-7 '46 Bantam BT3C '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm |
Re: Willys Questions..
Hi John,
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as my COX server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch I think it's worth $1500. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > John D wrote: > > > > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group... > > enjoy |
Re: Willys Questions..
Hi John,
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as my COX server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch I think it's worth $1500. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > John D wrote: > > > > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group... > > enjoy |
Re: Willys Questions..
Hi John,
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as my COX server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch I think it's worth $1500. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > John D wrote: > > > > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group... > > enjoy |
Re: Willys Questions..
Hi John,
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as my COX server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch I think it's worth $1500. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > John D wrote: > > > > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group... > > enjoy |
Re: Willys Questions..
I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Robert Bills wrote: > > I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B > being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs > necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the > classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I > have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.) > > In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase) > with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44 > front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess > you might call the end result a CJ-6B.) > > > Robert Bills > KG6LMV > Orange County CA > > '83 CJ-7 > '46 Bantam BT3C > '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm |
Re: Willys Questions..
I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Robert Bills wrote: > > I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B > being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs > necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the > classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I > have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.) > > In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase) > with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44 > front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess > you might call the end result a CJ-6B.) > > > Robert Bills > KG6LMV > Orange County CA > > '83 CJ-7 > '46 Bantam BT3C > '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm |
Re: Willys Questions..
I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Robert Bills wrote: > > I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B > being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs > necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the > classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I > have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.) > > In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase) > with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44 > front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess > you might call the end result a CJ-6B.) > > > Robert Bills > KG6LMV > Orange County CA > > '83 CJ-7 > '46 Bantam BT3C > '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm |
Re: Willys Questions..
I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Robert Bills wrote: > > I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B > being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs > necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the > classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I > have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.) > > In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase) > with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44 > front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess > you might call the end result a CJ-6B.) > > > Robert Bills > KG6LMV > Orange County CA > > '83 CJ-7 > '46 Bantam BT3C > '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm |
Re: Willys Questions..
>I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
>http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html Great site. Its been a resource for my Bantam trailer rehab. Robert Bills KG6LMV Orange County CA '83 CJ-7 '46 Bantam BT3C '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands