--- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
06-08-2007, 01:23 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
And I suppose you enjoy having somebody Spam your inbox with their personal
problems
when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to
put up with what
Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup.
Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name
calling individuals to my
response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette?
<?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
> <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Cross Posters SUCK........
> >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
>
> Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
>
> ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
> >>
> >> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >> >
> >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
> >>
> >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> >> is a forgery.
> >>
> >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> >> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
> >>
> >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
> >>
> >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
> >>
> >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> >> +0500
> >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> >> 1.20);
> >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> >> mikeh@mordor.com,
> >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >> >Lines: 27
> >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
> >>
> >> 4247
> >>
> >
>
problems
when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to
put up with what
Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup.
Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name
calling individuals to my
response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette?
<?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
> <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Cross Posters SUCK........
> >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
>
> Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
>
> ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
> >>
> >> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >> >
> >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
> >>
> >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> >> is a forgery.
> >>
> >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> >> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
> >>
> >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
> >>
> >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
> >>
> >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> >> +0500
> >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> >> 1.20);
> >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> >> mikeh@mordor.com,
> >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >> >Lines: 27
> >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
> >>
> >> 4247
> >>
> >
>
06-08-2007, 01:23 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
And I suppose you enjoy having somebody Spam your inbox with their personal
problems
when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to
put up with what
Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup.
Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name
calling individuals to my
response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette?
<?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
> <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Cross Posters SUCK........
> >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
>
> Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
>
> ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
> >>
> >> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >> >
> >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
> >>
> >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> >> is a forgery.
> >>
> >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> >> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
> >>
> >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
> >>
> >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
> >>
> >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> >> +0500
> >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> >> 1.20);
> >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> >> mikeh@mordor.com,
> >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >> >Lines: 27
> >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
> >>
> >> 4247
> >>
> >
>
problems
when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to
put up with what
Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup.
Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name
calling individuals to my
response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette?
<?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
> <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Cross Posters SUCK........
> >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
>
> Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
>
> ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
> >>
> >> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >> >
> >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
> >>
> >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> >> is a forgery.
> >>
> >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> >> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
> >>
> >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
> >>
> >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
> >>
> >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> >> +0500
> >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> >> 1.20);
> >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> >> mikeh@mordor.com,
> >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >> >Lines: 27
> >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
> >>
> >> 4247
> >>
> >
>
06-08-2007, 01:23 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
And I suppose you enjoy having somebody Spam your inbox with their personal
problems
when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to
put up with what
Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup.
Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name
calling individuals to my
response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette?
<?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
> <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Cross Posters SUCK........
> >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
>
> Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
>
> ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
> >>
> >> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >> >
> >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
> >>
> >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> >> is a forgery.
> >>
> >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> >> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
> >>
> >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
> >>
> >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
> >>
> >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> >> +0500
> >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> >> 1.20);
> >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> >> mikeh@mordor.com,
> >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >> >Lines: 27
> >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
> >>
> >> 4247
> >>
> >
>
problems
when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to
put up with what
Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup.
Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name
calling individuals to my
response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette?
<?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
> <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Cross Posters SUCK........
> >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
>
> Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
>
> ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
> >>
> >> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >> >
> >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
> >>
> >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> >> is a forgery.
> >>
> >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> >> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
> >>
> >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
> >>
> >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
> >>
> >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> >> +0500
> >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> >> 1.20);
> >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> >> mikeh@mordor.com,
> >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >> >Lines: 27
> >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
> >>
> >> 4247
> >>
> >
>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk
Jeep Mailing List
0
08-20-2007 01:07 PM
MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk
Jeep Mailing List
0
08-20-2007 10:00 AM
MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk
Jeep Mailing List
0
06-22-2007 10:10 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)