Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote ... > >>Incorrect. You won't find the vacuum disconnect axle on a 1994 Cherokee. >>Last model year for that was 1991 for XJ/MJ and 1995 for YJ. The hubs on >>a 94 Cherokee are permanently connected straight through the axles to >>the differential. > > Just like the TJ? > > I thought the Cherokee in '94 would have the same system as the YJ of the > same year. Yup, they ditched the problematic disconnect in '92 in the XJ coil link suspensions. They didn't bother investing the same change for the YJ's leaf-sprung Dana 30 knowing it was a dead duck soon to be replaced by the XJ coil link Dana 30 in the TJ. Steve http://xjeep.dyndns.org |
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote ... > >>Incorrect. You won't find the vacuum disconnect axle on a 1994 Cherokee. >>Last model year for that was 1991 for XJ/MJ and 1995 for YJ. The hubs on >>a 94 Cherokee are permanently connected straight through the axles to >>the differential. > > Just like the TJ? > > I thought the Cherokee in '94 would have the same system as the YJ of the > same year. Yup, they ditched the problematic disconnect in '92 in the XJ coil link suspensions. They didn't bother investing the same change for the YJ's leaf-sprung Dana 30 knowing it was a dead duck soon to be replaced by the XJ coil link Dana 30 in the TJ. Steve http://xjeep.dyndns.org |
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
That still has absolutely 'nothing' to do with unlocking the front
hubs!!!! That is the t-case binding up. It happens on my dana set up too because of the high traction muds I run. I thought the real bad set was the 410/411 splits on some of them. Mike "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote: > > Our Transfer cases are likely to bind coming out of four wheel > drive on good traction, because your AMC 20 and My nine inch do not > exactly match ratios with our front ends. Something Mike doesn't > experience having both front and rear Danas. > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Jeff Strickland wrote: > > > > But Mike, he was told to go in reverse to allow the mechanism to unlock. I > > was thinking he has the system like that in the YJ. It turns out he has the > > system that is like the TJ. > > > > This is not entirely true. Well, it is true in theory. That is there is no > > requirement, but we all know that the YJ's front axle can balk at unlocking > > when the tcase lever is moved back to 2WD, the work-around for this > > balkiness is to back up a few yards. |
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
That still has absolutely 'nothing' to do with unlocking the front
hubs!!!! That is the t-case binding up. It happens on my dana set up too because of the high traction muds I run. I thought the real bad set was the 410/411 splits on some of them. Mike "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote: > > Our Transfer cases are likely to bind coming out of four wheel > drive on good traction, because your AMC 20 and My nine inch do not > exactly match ratios with our front ends. Something Mike doesn't > experience having both front and rear Danas. > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Jeff Strickland wrote: > > > > But Mike, he was told to go in reverse to allow the mechanism to unlock. I > > was thinking he has the system like that in the YJ. It turns out he has the > > system that is like the TJ. > > > > This is not entirely true. Well, it is true in theory. That is there is no > > requirement, but we all know that the YJ's front axle can balk at unlocking > > when the tcase lever is moved back to 2WD, the work-around for this > > balkiness is to back up a few yards. |
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
That still has absolutely 'nothing' to do with unlocking the front
hubs!!!! That is the t-case binding up. It happens on my dana set up too because of the high traction muds I run. I thought the real bad set was the 410/411 splits on some of them. Mike "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote: > > Our Transfer cases are likely to bind coming out of four wheel > drive on good traction, because your AMC 20 and My nine inch do not > exactly match ratios with our front ends. Something Mike doesn't > experience having both front and rear Danas. > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Jeff Strickland wrote: > > > > But Mike, he was told to go in reverse to allow the mechanism to unlock. I > > was thinking he has the system like that in the YJ. It turns out he has the > > system that is like the TJ. > > > > This is not entirely true. Well, it is true in theory. That is there is no > > requirement, but we all know that the YJ's front axle can balk at unlocking > > when the tcase lever is moved back to 2WD, the work-around for this > > balkiness is to back up a few yards. |
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:421F6844.BCC3559B@sympatico.ca... > > > There is no such thing as having to go into reverse to 'unlock' front > > hubs or axles period! That cannot happen on "ANY" Jeep! > > > > This is not entirely true. Well, it is true in theory. That is there is no > requirement, but we all know that the YJ's front axle can balk at unlocking > when the tcase lever is moved back to 2WD, the work-around for this > balkiness is to back up a few yards. The best work around it to hit 3000 rpm and let off the gas for maximum vacuum. Going in reverse has 0 effect except at the idle point when the vacuum comes up because the transfer case is already in 2 wheel drive so the driveshaft is loose already. Mike |
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:421F6844.BCC3559B@sympatico.ca... > > > There is no such thing as having to go into reverse to 'unlock' front > > hubs or axles period! That cannot happen on "ANY" Jeep! > > > > This is not entirely true. Well, it is true in theory. That is there is no > requirement, but we all know that the YJ's front axle can balk at unlocking > when the tcase lever is moved back to 2WD, the work-around for this > balkiness is to back up a few yards. The best work around it to hit 3000 rpm and let off the gas for maximum vacuum. Going in reverse has 0 effect except at the idle point when the vacuum comes up because the transfer case is already in 2 wheel drive so the driveshaft is loose already. Mike |
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:421F6844.BCC3559B@sympatico.ca... > > > There is no such thing as having to go into reverse to 'unlock' front > > hubs or axles period! That cannot happen on "ANY" Jeep! > > > > This is not entirely true. Well, it is true in theory. That is there is no > requirement, but we all know that the YJ's front axle can balk at unlocking > when the tcase lever is moved back to 2WD, the work-around for this > balkiness is to back up a few yards. The best work around it to hit 3000 rpm and let off the gas for maximum vacuum. Going in reverse has 0 effect except at the idle point when the vacuum comes up because the transfer case is already in 2 wheel drive so the driveshaft is loose already. Mike |
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Yup, that's it and that's enough not to be able to release four
drive in just a couple of feet after getting up on the road. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Mike Romain wrote: > > That still has absolutely 'nothing' to do with unlocking the front > hubs!!!! > > That is the t-case binding up. It happens on my dana set up too because > of the high traction muds I run. > > I thought the real bad set was the 410/411 splits on some of them. > > Mike |
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Yup, that's it and that's enough not to be able to release four
drive in just a couple of feet after getting up on the road. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Mike Romain wrote: > > That still has absolutely 'nothing' to do with unlocking the front > hubs!!!! > > That is the t-case binding up. It happens on my dana set up too because > of the high traction muds I run. > > I thought the real bad set was the 410/411 splits on some of them. > > Mike |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands